#fedora-meeting-2: F20 Beta Go/No-Go meeting
Meeting started by jreznik at 17:00:23 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- Roll Call (jreznik, 17:00:53)
- Purpose of this meeting (jreznik, 17:05:00)
- Purpose of this meeting is to see whether or
not F20 Beta is ready for shipment, according to the release
criteria. (jreznik,
17:05:37)
- This is determined in a few ways: (jreznik,
17:05:38)
- No remaining blocker bugs (jreznik,
17:05:40)
- Test matrices for Beta are fully
completed (jreznik,
17:05:41)
- http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/20/beta/buglist
(jreznik,
17:05:43)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_20_Beta_TC6_Install
(jreznik,
17:05:44)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_20_Beta_TC6_Base
(jreznik,
17:05:46)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_20_Beta_TC6_Desktop
(jreznik,
17:05:47)
- Current status (jreznik, 17:06:08)
- https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5787
(jreznik,
17:07:55)
- (1024144) SizeNotPositiveError: spec= param must be >=0 (tflink, 17:14:06)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024144
(tflink,
17:14:06)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink,
17:14:07)
- ACTION: cmurf and
adamw to continue the conversation of whether lvm thinp and btrfs
should be tech previews for F20 (tflink,
17:39:39)
- AGREED: 1024144 -
RejectedBlocker - This bug involves a disk layout which was modified
outside of the installer and thus, is too much of a corner case to
block the release of F20 beta. Please re-propose for final.
(tflink,
17:39:52)
- (967521) /var/log/journal breaks system startup (tflink, 17:40:04)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967521
(tflink,
17:40:04)
- Proposed Blocker, plymouth, MODIFIED
(tflink,
17:40:04)
- AGREED: 967521 -
RejectedBlocker RejectedFreezeException - Slow bootup is not a
blocker or FreezeException worthy issue, especially for an issue
that has been around as long as this one has. Please re-propose with
a better justification for why this bug should block release if
there is more going on than we understand. (tflink,
17:49:50)
- (1000891) DVD is oversized (larger than 4.7 GB) (tflink, 17:51:13)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000891
(tflink,
17:51:14)
- Accepted Blocker, distribution, MODIFIED
(tflink,
17:51:14)
- waiting on a workable fix for pungi in order to
be able to move forward on this (tflink,
17:56:19)
- ACTION: jreznik to
coordinate with dgilmore and dmach on getting a workable pungi
fix (tflink,
18:01:14)
- (1023767) shim update to 0.5 fails to boot (tflink, 18:02:58)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023767
(tflink,
18:02:59)
- Accepted Blocker, shim, NEW (tflink,
18:02:59)
- this will be addressed for TC7/RC1 by removing
shim-0.5-1 and thus, working around the release blocking
behavior (tflink,
18:03:59)
- once the releace blocking behavior has been
mitigated, this bug will no longer block release (tflink,
18:04:29)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010474
(tflink,
18:08:50)
- Go/No-Go decision (jreznik, 18:25:43)
- qa is no-go because of unaddressed
blockers (jreznik,
18:26:22)
- (983110) several autostart apps (e.g. polkit-kde, kmix) and logout/shutdown countdown fails (tflink, 18:44:07)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=983110
(tflink,
18:44:10)
- Proposed Blocker, kde-workspace, NEW
(tflink,
18:44:12)
- AGREED: 983110 -
RejectedBlocker - This bug has been around for a long time, has
reasonable workarounds and does not appear to be hitting with much
consistencty. (tflink,
18:51:33)
- Go/No-Go decision (tflink, 18:52:15)
- AGREED: full week
slip due to unresolved blocker bugs by the go/no-go meeting and
unavailability of QA resources for one day slip; propose shorter
"beta to final cycle" to FESCo due to potential clash with holidays
with early freeze date (jreznik,
19:23:50)
- ACTION: jreznik to
announce slip and propose shorter beta to final period to
FESCo (jreznik,
19:24:58)
- Open floor (jreznik, 19:25:10)
- https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/96
(dgilmore,
19:27:01)
Meeting ended at 19:31:41 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- cmurf and adamw to continue the conversation of whether lvm thinp and btrfs should be tech previews for F20
- jreznik to coordinate with dgilmore and dmach on getting a workable pungi fix
- jreznik to announce slip and propose shorter beta to final period to FESCo
Action items, by person
- cmurf
- cmurf and adamw to continue the conversation of whether lvm thinp and btrfs should be tech previews for F20
- dgilmore
- jreznik to coordinate with dgilmore and dmach on getting a workable pungi fix
- jreznik
- jreznik to coordinate with dgilmore and dmach on getting a workable pungi fix
- jreznik to announce slip and propose shorter beta to final period to FESCo
People present (lines said)
- cmurf (140)
- tflink (137)
- jreznik (113)
- nirik (29)
- dgilmore (29)
- pjones (21)
- roshi (15)
- jwb (13)
- zodbot (9)
- nangthang (4)
- jzb (3)
- robatino (3)
- pwhalen (1)
- satellit (1)
- shaiton (1)
- satellit_ (1)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.