15:00:20 <pwhalen> #startmeeting Fedora ARM and AArch64 Status Meeting 15:00:20 <zodbot> Meeting started Tue May 28 15:00:20 2019 UTC. 15:00:20 <zodbot> This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 15:00:20 <zodbot> The chair is pwhalen. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:20 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:00:20 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_arm_and_aarch64_status_meeting' 15:00:28 <pwhalen> good morning folks, who's here today? 15:01:25 * tdawson is here. 15:02:14 * jlinton waves 15:02:39 * pbrobinson o/ 15:03:34 <pwhalen> alright, lets start 15:03:38 <pwhalen> #topic 1) ==== Userspace Status ==== 15:04:01 <pwhalen> anyone seeing new issues? 15:04:31 <pwhalen> #info dnf.exceptions.Error: Incorrect or unknown "arch": armv7hcnl 15:04:38 <pwhalen> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691430 15:05:01 <pwhalen> PR was submitted to fix this 15:05:08 <pbrobinson> nothing of note from my side 15:05:59 <tdawson> nothing from me 15:06:46 <pwhalen> #topic 2) ==== Kernel Status ==== 15:07:05 <pwhalen> #info F30: kernel-5.1.5-300.fc30 15:07:05 <pwhalen> #link https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1270727 15:07:31 <jlinton> the dnf bug should probably match on arm[78]h.* 15:07:43 <pbrobinson> the 5.1 series seems in reasonable state in the rebase, I've not seen any issues, but please do raise them on irc/email etc if you find any 15:07:49 <jlinton> that way it doesn't happen again 15:08:15 <pwhalen> jlinton, could you leave a comment on the bz? 15:08:20 <jlinton> yes 15:08:25 <pwhalen> jlinton, thanks 15:09:12 <pbrobinson> jlinton: is 'h' assumed on v8, even 32 bit? 15:09:12 <pwhalen> pbrobinson, agreed 5.1 looks pretty good 15:09:50 <pbrobinson> dnf should just use the logic in librpm rather than duplicating it 15:10:23 <jlinton> pbrobinson: Yes I think the float is mandatory on v8 15:11:32 <pwhalen> #info F31: kernel-5.2.0-0.rc2.git0.1.fc31 15:11:32 <pwhalen> #link https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1271497 15:12:24 <pwhalen> #info Investigating serial console issue on ARMv7 with 5.2. 15:13:04 <pwhalen> any other kernel issues? news? 15:14:21 <pwhalen> #info Please test and report any issues to the list or #fedora-arm. 15:14:49 <pbrobinson> 5.2 is on my list for this week 15:15:20 <pwhalen> #topic 3) ==== Bootloader Status ==== 15:15:33 <pwhalen> I don't think anything has changed here 15:15:45 <pwhalen> #info No issues reported. 15:16:56 <pwhalen> #topic 4) ==== Fedora 31 ==== 15:18:26 <pwhalen> we've had a few successful composes recently, most recent being yesterday. Other than kernel issues is anyone seeing any problems? 15:20:52 <pwhalen> #info Fedora 31 Changes 15:20:58 <pwhalen> #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/31/ChangeSet 15:21:29 <pbrobinson> yes, I need to write some up 15:21:30 <pwhalen> Are there any changes that look concerning? 15:22:09 <pbrobinson> I'll take a look later 15:23:56 <pwhalen> Ok, sounds good. We can discuss it further next week. 15:24:51 <pwhalen> #topic 5) == Open Floor == 15:25:08 <nirik> any further news on my fav armv7 pause bug? ;) 15:25:36 <pbrobinson> nirik: we're slowly bisecting it 15:25:47 <nirik> I tried to get a f29 install with that exact kernel, but ran into weird issues. 15:25:48 <pbrobinson> it's not a fast process but it's active an ongoing 15:26:27 <pwhalen> nirik, what weird issues? 15:26:30 <nirik> cool. I'm not 100% sure it's kernel... 15:27:08 <nirik> well, our setup we do the install and then extract the vmlinuz/initramfs and use those externally to boot... 15:27:44 <nirik> so when I did a install with kernel X and installed kernel Y and it wouldn't boot right... perhaps cmdline isn't extracting right 15:29:03 <pwhalen> OK, maybe post in channel if you hit it again 15:29:17 <nirik> sure, can look later today 15:29:59 * satellit_ listening 15:30:02 <pwhalen> but I'd agree, same kernel works on f29 userspace and paused in f30 15:30:25 <nirik> so perhaps binutils or glibc or something. 15:30:31 <nirik> but no idea. ;( 15:31:33 <nirik> would it be worth asking glibc/tools folks to look? 15:32:13 <pwhalen> hrm, ..it also looks like the f30 builder with 4.20 GA has done a bunch of builds successfully and not paused. 15:33:06 <nirik> thats f30 GA with 4.20.0-1? 15:33:53 <pwhalen> f30 up to date, with 4.20 GA 15:34:04 <pwhalen> updated last week 15:34:20 <nirik> ok 15:34:56 <pwhalen> But I'll keep at it, seems its working better than I thought. Not sure why the first build paused it 15:35:28 <pwhalen> I think its still worth trying in production 15:36:23 <nirik> ok. I did a f30 install a few days ago... it has 5.0.17-300 on it right now... 15:38:44 <pwhalen> I didnt try that version, but 5.0.x paused, also 5.1.. 5.2 we have another issue on armhfp so not tested. 15:39:11 <nirik> I'll try and put 4.20.0-1 on this one. 15:39:27 <pwhalen> nirik, thank you. As always. 15:40:44 <pwhalen> anything else for today? 15:42:01 <pwhalen> #endmeeting