15:00:21 <contyk> #startmeeting Modularity Team Meeting 15:00:21 <zodbot> Meeting started Tue Feb 11 15:00:21 2020 UTC. 15:00:21 <zodbot> This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 15:00:21 <zodbot> The chair is contyk. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:21 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:00:21 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'modularity_team_meeting' 15:00:22 <contyk> #meetingname modularity 15:00:23 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'modularity' 15:00:32 <contyk> Hello hello hello. 15:00:36 <contyk> #topic Roll Call 15:00:40 <contyk> .hello psabata 15:00:41 <zodbot> contyk: psabata 'Petr Šabata' <psabata@redhat.com> 15:02:32 <langdon> .hello2 15:02:33 <zodbot> langdon: langdon 'Langdon White' <langdon@redhat.com> 15:02:53 <contyk> #topic Agenda 15:03:01 <contyk> There is no agenda, as far as I know. 15:03:32 <contyk> Furthermore, we're all moving to different roles and this meeting is going to be managed by someone from the Sowftware Management group. 15:03:45 <contyk> I don't think they are around today but they will sort it out in the upcoming weeks. 15:03:59 <contyk> #info No agenda today. 15:04:04 <contyk> #topic Open Floor 15:04:14 <contyk> So I'll leave this open for the two of us, langdon. 15:04:23 <contyk> Do you have anything? :) 15:05:42 <contyk> Closing at :10. 15:07:56 <langdon> no not really 15:08:40 <contyk> I'd suggest we cancel this meeting unless there's a new objective, too. 15:08:47 <contyk> Or until, rather. 15:09:33 <langdon> i am concerned about treating the existing objective "complete" or "closed" 15:10:00 <contyk> But wasn't it formally closed? 15:10:18 <langdon> contyk: no.. not to my knowledge 15:10:33 <contyk> I saw a ticket about removing you from the Council so I assumed :) 15:10:33 <sgallagh> Sorry I'm late. 15:10:44 <sgallagh> I have a topic to raise, actually 15:10:51 <contyk> Go ahead. 15:10:57 <langdon> well.. i was supposed to be replaced as the lead.. see above, from you ;) 15:11:21 <contyk> Well, yes. 15:11:36 <sgallagh> I filed a PR against the modulemd v2 specification today in response to some problems that Pulp/Satellite is having. 15:11:45 <sgallagh> #link https://github.com/fedora-modularity/libmodulemd/pull/447 15:12:21 <sgallagh> Basically, the use of the word "optional" for the N:S:V:C:A components is causing confusion and some repos have been created with metadata lacking the `context` field 15:13:12 <contyk> I see. 15:13:17 <contyk> Lots of empty lines, too :) 15:13:20 <sgallagh> I'd like to make sure that my new assertions are valid. 15:13:25 <contyk> I'll go through the changes and ack it. 15:13:35 <contyk> So far it seems alright. 15:13:53 <contyk> Technically it is still optional for the format, yes. But it is expected by software management tooling. 15:13:56 <sgallagh> Specifically: do we want to treat all of NSVCA as mandatory for repo 15:14:19 <sgallagh> Or do we want to change DNF's handling to treat missing values as some sort of default 15:14:21 <sgallagh> ? 15:14:44 <contyk> I'd say DNF should consider such documents broken for its purposes and ignore them. 15:14:48 <contyk> That'd be my guidance. 15:15:34 <contyk> Defaults would lead to conflicting documents. 15:16:36 <sgallagh> Well DNF/Pulp. See the BZ linked in the PR description 15:17:20 <contyk> Well, yes, any software management tool that works with repos. 15:19:44 <sgallagh> That’s all I had, I think 15:22:15 <contyk> Okay; will review after the call I'm in. 15:22:30 <contyk> If there's nothing else... closing in a minute. 15:24:25 <contyk> #endmeeting