15:00:19 <jednorozec> #startmeeting RELENG (2021-06-15) 15:00:19 <zodbot> Meeting started Tue Jun 15 15:00:19 2021 UTC. 15:00:19 <zodbot> This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 15:00:19 <zodbot> The chair is jednorozec. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:19 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:00:19 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'releng_(2021-06-15)' 15:00:20 <jednorozec> #meetingname releng 15:00:20 <jednorozec> #chair nirik sharkcz pbrobinson pingou mboddu dustymabe ksinny jednorozec 15:00:20 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'releng' 15:00:20 <zodbot> Current chairs: dustymabe jednorozec ksinny mboddu nirik pbrobinson pingou sharkcz 15:00:20 <jednorozec> #topic init process 15:00:30 <nirik> morning 15:00:39 <sharkcz> hi all 15:00:47 <mboddu> Hello 15:00:59 <jednorozec> hello everyone 15:02:57 <jednorozec> soo there is a new issue with meeting tag 15:03:03 <jednorozec> .releng 10162 15:03:05 <zodbot> jednorozec: Issue #10162: Are repos in the container namespace also branched from rawhide? - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10162 15:04:07 <mboddu> So, should we branch or shouldn't we? 15:04:26 <nirik> I thought we didn't... but I am not sure why we decided that. 15:04:51 <nirik> we could ask for input on devel / ask fesco to weigh in? 15:05:31 <jednorozec> we should, I think there are number of ways one can use the container git repo. Not everyone will want to get branched 15:06:00 <mboddu> +1 to nirik's plan 15:06:32 <mboddu> Lets start with devel list and if we see more people wanting it, then we can file a FESCo ticket for approval 15:06:56 <nirik> cool. You want me to post it? or one of you wants to? 15:07:53 <jednorozec> I can do that 15:10:59 <jednorozec> so what is next 15:11:35 <nirik> thanks. 15:11:55 <nirik> next for the meeting? ;) 15:12:09 <jednorozec> so I have one question for mboddu 15:12:16 * nirik had something he was going to bring up, but now... I can't remember it. ;( 15:12:33 <mboddu> jednorozec: Shoot 15:12:33 <jednorozec> what key is used to sign butane? 15:12:36 <jednorozec> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10163 15:13:00 <mboddu> jednorozec: Right, the script has the key listed in it, all we need to do is run it on bodhi-backend01, that is all 15:13:16 <mboddu> And upload it to your humaton.fedorapeople.org and give them the link 15:13:35 <jednorozec> mboddu, ahh I was confused that KEYTOSIGNWITH='fedora-34' was just a placeholder 15:13:57 <mboddu> jednorozec: Nope, that is being used during the invocation of the script 15:14:20 <jednorozec> mboddu, ok thanks. 15:14:37 <mboddu> I generally create a temp dir and work in that temp dir and upload that dir to mohanboddu.fedorapeople.org 15:16:11 <jednorozec> .releng 10134 15:16:12 <zodbot> jednorozec: Issue #10134: Shorten side-tag merge window by tagging builds after being singed all of them - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10134 15:16:34 <jednorozec> so this just means to update docs to enable signing as with other tags? 15:17:10 <nirik> yeah, for any 'larger' tag 15:17:30 <jednorozec> meaning? 500+ packages? 15:18:15 <nirik> not sure where the cut off should be. I guess really we could just say any releng added side tag? since we don't get many now? 15:18:32 <jednorozec> +1 15:19:51 <jednorozec> I will update the doc 15:19:55 <mboddu> +1 to any releng created side tags 15:20:28 <mboddu> jednorozec: Its in the doc, we stopped following it since not many side tags were getting requested. Now, we just have to follow the SOP 15:22:01 * nirik cleans out monitor-gating side-tags while we are thinking about sidetags. 15:22:17 <jednorozec> mboddu, ack 15:22:41 <nirik> we should really fix that. either in bodhi or in monitor gating. ;( 15:23:21 <nirik> 110 side tags deleted. 15:23:40 <jednorozec> nirik, so problem is that we dont cleanup any gating side-tags? 15:23:54 <jednorozec> or worse case we cleanup some of them? 15:24:18 <nirik> jednorozec: I'm not sure if it's 100% of them, or just some of them, but some just don't get cleaned up... there's a script to do so. 15:25:14 <nirik> looks like it might not be untagging right 15:25:14 <jednorozec> nirik, in releng repo? I can have a look at it this week 15:26:07 <nirik> no, it's a openshift app... monitor-gating (its the thing that makes random builds and makes updates and makes sure ci tests them, a end to end test) 15:26:18 <nirik> look for example at: f35-build-side-42237 15:26:36 <nirik> it looks like it's never untagging the builds from the side-tag... but perhaps bodhi should be doing that? 15:27:19 <nirik> ok, yeah, it's not happy. 15:27:20 <jednorozec> nirik, i will look into it. 15:27:26 <nirik> (and no one is watching it I guess?) 15:27:55 <jednorozec> there is a dashboard for gating 15:27:57 <jednorozec> https://monitor-dashboard-web-monitor-dashboard.app.os.fedoraproject.org/d/6q2qpcvGz/monitor-gating?orgId=1 15:28:37 <nirik> huh 15:28:56 <nirik> might be failing in a way that doesn't show failure. 15:28:59 <nirik> 14:17:21 - Update None created : https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/None 15:28:59 <nirik> [DONE] 15:29:06 <nirik> None? 15:29:10 <jednorozec> huh 15:29:21 <nirik> 14:17:21 - Update for dummy-test-package-crested-0-3739 not created within 15 minutes 15:29:21 <nirik> [FAILED] 15:29:41 <jednorozec> ok I will ask adam tomorrow about that 15:30:02 <jednorozec> And we will fix it 15:30:21 <nirik> ok, awesome. thanks. 15:31:10 <mboddu> I hope its not one of those `None` issues in bodhi db that happened last year or so 15:31:44 <nirik> I think if so there would have been others affected. 15:33:50 <nirik> mboddu: how's your mini-iniative? :) 15:34:05 <mboddu> nirik: Nope, not started on it yet :( 15:34:38 <mboddu> Last Fri we tackled some mass rebuild stuff in CS and couldn't find time to work on this :( 15:34:47 * mboddu feels bad now 15:36:27 <nirik> no worries. 15:37:49 <jednorozec> The good thing about work is that it does not run away ;) 15:40:58 <jednorozec> .releng 9240 15:40:59 <zodbot> jednorozec: Issue #9240: Update published Fedora 31 cloud images - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9240 15:41:16 <jednorozec> so can we close it now, that there are tracking tickets in the cloud sig? 15:42:07 <Southern_Gentlem> f31 sould be dead 15:42:28 <Southern_Gentlem> or are they meaning update to f34 15:42:36 <nirik> this has just been around that long. ;) 15:43:09 <mboddu> Haha :) 15:43:10 <nirik> I guess closing and saying 'let us know when you want us to do anything' would work... 15:43:21 <mboddu> And yes, we can close it... ^ 15:45:53 <jednorozec> so what can we do about this 15:45:56 <jednorozec> .releng 8579 15:46:00 <zodbot> jednorozec: Issue #8579: Clean out accidentally committed tarballs in rpms/tlog - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8579 15:46:40 <nirik> so, there was some clever thing I think churchyard did for another repo with this... 15:46:54 <nirik> basically moving the commit to a archive ref so it's still there, but never gets pulled. 15:47:07 <jednorozec> oh, I remember he posted something in one of the issues 15:47:23 <jednorozec> blender or something 15:48:00 <nirik> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7265 15:49:10 <jednorozec> thanks 15:49:19 <nirik> so, I guess do the same there? 15:49:26 <nirik> and write a sop? :) 15:49:27 <jednorozec> yup 15:50:25 * jednorozec writes sop for everything, not always up-to-date though 15:50:48 <jednorozec> #topic Open Floor 15:50:51 <mboddu> Thanks jednorozec 15:51:21 <jednorozec> I will start working on the issues we discussed tomorrow. 15:52:19 <nirik> cool. 15:53:10 <jednorozec> If there is nothing more, I would end this meeting. 15:53:24 <nirik> still can't think of what I was gonna bring up, but lets end... I can always go next week. ;) 15:53:35 <jednorozec> There is a LOT of hay that needs to be turned here. 15:54:20 <jednorozec> nirik, write it down or highlight me on standup I will read it back 15:54:32 <jednorozec> #endmeeting