2024-05-07 15:00:41 <@coremodule:fedora.im> !startmeeting Fedora ARM Working Group Meeting
2024-05-07 15:00:42 <@meetbot:fedora.im> Meeting started at 2024-05-07 15:00:41 UTC
2024-05-07 15:00:43 <@meetbot:fedora.im> The Meeting name is 'Fedora ARM Working Group Meeting'
2024-05-07 15:00:47 <@coremodule:fedora.im> !topic roll call
2024-05-07 15:01:01 <@coremodule:fedora.im> Hello all, who is around today for an ARM meeting?
2024-05-07 15:01:06 <@wcrobert:matrix.org> Hello
2024-05-07 15:01:07 <@nielsenb:fedora.im> !hi
2024-05-07 15:01:11 <@zodbot:fedora.im> Brandon Nielsen (nielsenb)
2024-05-07 15:01:19 <@linuxfriend01:fedora.im> hello
2024-05-07 15:01:26 <@jlinton:fedora.im> wcrobert: the advantage of this over irc is you can edit your messages.
2024-05-07 15:02:46 <@coremodule:fedora.im> Hello to all, let's get started!
2024-05-07 15:02:49 <@coremodule:fedora.im> !topic 1) ==== Previous Release ====
2024-05-07 15:02:54 <@coremodule:fedora.im> !info Fedora-39-20240507.0  
2024-05-07 15:02:59 <@coremodule:fedora.im> !link https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/overview?distri=fedora&version=39&build=Fedora-Cloud-39-20240507.0&groupid=5
2024-05-07 15:03:11 <@coremodule:fedora.im> Anything for F39? I have nothing.
2024-05-07 15:03:43 <@jlinton:fedora.im> Not from me.
2024-05-07 15:03:57 <@wcrobert:matrix.org> Nothing for F39
2024-05-07 15:04:15 <@coremodule:fedora.im> Okay! Moving on!
2024-05-07 15:04:21 <@coremodule:fedora.im> !info No new info for F39 reported.
2024-05-07 15:04:25 <@coremodule:fedora.im> !topic 2) ==== Current Release ====
2024-05-07 15:04:30 <@coremodule:fedora.im> !info Fedora-40-20240507.0  
2024-05-07 15:04:37 <@coremodule:fedora.im> !link https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/overview?distri=fedora&version=40&build=Fedora-Cloud-40-20240507.0&groupid=5
2024-05-07 15:05:14 <@coremodule:fedora.im> How about F40?
2024-05-07 15:06:14 <@jlinton:fedora.im> I've got a F40 install problem that doesn't manifest on F39 I'm chasing, no bugs yet though. Probably HW related.
2024-05-07 15:06:41 <@coremodule:fedora.im> Got it jlinton. Which hardware are you using?
2024-05-07 15:07:06 <@jlinton:fedora.im> The ISO image isn't detected on a MMC (its actually a virtual platform), which is why its probably a "HW" problem, but its really odd
2024-05-07 15:07:24 <@jlinton:fedora.im> since the ISO device/label/etc shows up.
2024-05-07 15:07:53 <@coremodule:fedora.im> Interesting. Okay, well when you get to the point of filing a bug, will you post it in the ARM channel?
2024-05-07 15:08:10 <@jlinton:fedora.im> The ISO _repo) image isn't detected on a MMC (its actually a virtual platform), which is why its probably a "HW" problem, but its really odd
2024-05-07 15:08:23 <@jlinton:fedora.im> The ISO \_repo\_ image isn't detected on a MMC (its actually a virtual platform), which is why its probably a "HW" problem, but its really odd
2024-05-07 15:09:18 <@coremodule:fedora.im> !topic 3) ==== Kernel Status ====
2024-05-07 15:09:22 <@coremodule:fedora.im> !info F40 kernel-6.8.9-300.fc40
2024-05-07 15:09:26 <@coremodule:fedora.im> !link https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2447547
2024-05-07 15:09:30 <@coremodule:fedora.im> !info Rawhide kernel-6.9.0-0.rc6.52.fc41
2024-05-07 15:09:33 <@coremodule:fedora.im> !link https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2449233
2024-05-07 15:10:42 <@coremodule:fedora.im> Hey jforbes, just wondering if you were around and could give us an update on these latest two kernels?
2024-05-07 15:10:55 <@jforbes:fedora.im> Oh, sorry, in dual meetings.
2024-05-07 15:11:03 <@coremodule:fedora.im> No problem, I figured you were.
2024-05-07 15:11:19 <@jforbes:fedora.im> The 6.9 rc7 is likely the last rc, and 6.9.0 should be out next week
2024-05-07 15:11:53 <@jforbes:fedora.im> I haven't seen any specific aarch64 issues in the most recent kernels.  The memory leak is now fixed
2024-05-07 15:12:22 <@coremodule:fedora.im> !info The ARM kernel memory leak issue from last week has been addressed and is fixed now.
2024-05-07 15:12:31 <@coremodule:fedora.im> Thanks for this update jforbes.
2024-05-07 15:13:00 <@jforbes:fedora.im> NP
2024-05-07 15:13:51 <@coremodule:fedora.im> !topic 4) ==== Bootloader Status ====
2024-05-07 15:13:55 <@coremodule:fedora.im> !info uboot-tools-2024.04-1.fc40
2024-05-07 15:13:59 <@coremodule:fedora.im> !link https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2434853
2024-05-07 15:14:18 <@coremodule:fedora.im> No new uboot so we don't have much to discuss here.
2024-05-07 15:14:40 <@coremodule:fedora.im> !topic 5) ==== Fedora Rawhide status ===
2024-05-07 15:14:43 <@coremodule:fedora.im> !info Fedora-Rawhide-20240507.0
2024-05-07 15:14:47 <@coremodule:fedora.im> !link https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/overview?distri=fedora&version=Rawhide&build=Fedora-Rawhide-20240507.n.0&groupid=5
2024-05-07 15:15:06 <@coremodule:fedora.im> openQA testing on rawhide looks OK, especially for this stage. I feel OK with this. Anything for rawhide today?
2024-05-07 15:15:32 <@wcrobert:matrix.org> Where do I raise adding a package?
2024-05-07 15:16:06 <@coremodule:fedora.im> wcroberts, I'd do it at the open floor after this section.
2024-05-07 15:16:42 <@coremodule:fedora.im> Which we can move on to!
2024-05-07 15:16:44 <@coremodule:fedora.im> !topic 6) ==== Open Floor ====
2024-05-07 15:16:53 <@coremodule:fedora.im> The floor is yours Bill Roberts .
2024-05-07 15:16:57 <@wcrobert:matrix.org> I Would like to raise packing mbedtls version 3.6. There is a new LTS version available. I am considering a side-by-side install with everything “namespaces” to
The version number following the https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Conflicts.This would allow packages to move from mbedtls v 2.28 to package mbedtls3.6
As they can. v2.28 will be EOL soon (I forget the exact timeline). It’s important to note that the upstream project does not include ABI in 
The semantic version number, so 3.6 and 3.8 would not be ABI compatible. They also miss so version updates as well.
2024-05-07 15:18:10 <@coremodule:fedora.im> Bill Roberts: are you currently a Fedora packager?
2024-05-07 15:18:25 <@jlinton:fedora.im> This is like a @pbrobinson thing, no?
2024-05-07 15:18:28 <@wcrobert:matrix.org> Yes
2024-05-07 15:19:03 <@coremodule:fedora.im> I would make a review request and tag pbrobinson in it for the review there.
2024-05-07 15:19:33 <@coremodule:fedora.im> !link https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/New_Package_Process_for_New_Contributors/#create_your_review_request
2024-05-07 15:20:06 <@wcrobert:matrix.org> Thanks
2024-05-07 15:20:17 <@wcrobert:matrix.org> Thats what I was looking for
2024-05-07 15:20:34 <@coremodule:fedora.im> That should start the process and get the folks who need to be involved together to look at your proposal.
2024-05-07 15:21:32 <@coremodule:fedora.im> Good! Anything else today?
2024-05-07 15:22:26 <@coremodule:fedora.im> Thanks for attending today. See you next week.
2024-05-07 15:22:32 <@coremodule:fedora.im> !endmeeting