00:00:23 #startmeeting Ansible Azure Working Group 00:00:23 Meeting started Thu Feb 7 00:00:23 2019 UTC. 00:00:23 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 00:00:23 The chair is nitzmahone. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 00:00:23 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 00:00:23 The meeting name has been set to 'ansible_azure_working_group' 00:00:37 hey 00:00:39 #chair zikalino82 jborean93 00:00:39 Current chairs: jborean93 nitzmahone zikalino82 00:00:42 howdy 00:01:11 great! i thought nobody would be here. everybody in china on holidays :-) 00:01:52 We'll usually at least see if anyone's around rather than just canceling the meeting 00:02:50 yeah, i am on holidays too.... but a bit bored and have a couple of prs 00:02:55 Saw your note about a few of the updates 00:03:08 and one from our contributor: https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/42400 00:03:35 this one we discussed before, nitzmahone did you have a chance to think about these windows features? 00:03:59 Someone on the MS side was supposed to be asking around about those being the "right" way to do things vs using extensions 00:04:05 I think the winrm stuff was waiting on clarification on what's the proper way forward 00:04:10 yea 00:04:41 oh, so i think @yungezz 00:05:28 Yeah, if we can get a "ruling" on that (the docs are unclear to me), might be a few naming-related changes, but don't want to ask for those unless we're going to move forward with it 00:06:23 hehe, hopefully contributor won't get angry again ;-) 00:06:26 the cosmosdb account changes look ok 00:06:34 ok, i have a few modules.... 00:06:47 first of all, i fixed your comments cosmos db in https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/47181 00:07:04 oh, ok... that's merged, thanks! :-) 00:07:14 Yeah, just hit merge on that one. Bummer about the idempotent delete, but maybe the REST API will get better over time 00:08:05 then that vmss instance module, has one property right now, so it's really simple. i want to add stuff to this one very carefully, but there will be more in the future 00:08:32 your copypasta is showing ("Assert the state of the SQL Server" again ;) ) 00:08:56 oh, in the test of vmss :-( 00:09:07 module docs too 00:09:24 https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/51461/files#diff-07cf5c59dc7d08c97f4460ce6e654abaR51 00:10:15 ouch... can't see these things any more :-( 00:10:42 and then i have devtest labs modules to complete the scenario: https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/51462 00:10:43 is "apply latest model" a concept name from the docs somewhere? 00:12:21 jborean93: what do you think, does "azure_rm_devtestlabartifactsource" go too far with the "no underscores" thing? 00:12:39 it's definitely out there 00:12:57 I would say add `azure_rm_devtestlab_artifactsource` but not sure if we already have some devtestlab modules 00:13:02 I guess we've already set the precedence, so 🤷 00:13:12 I'm wondering whether we should start looking at removing the `_rm_` 00:13:39 we do, but just one from 2.8 that hasn't shipped yet, so we *could* I guess, but ... 00:13:57 well, azure_rm_devtestlab and azure_rm_devtestlabvirtualnetwork 00:14:34 *sigh* it's tough to be consistent on this stuff without turning into a_ridiculous_pile_of_snake_case 00:14:44 yeah, we still have some modules with underscores 00:15:03 we can always make an alias and deprecate the old name sometime in the future but best to get it right now 00:15:17 Yeah... I'm leaning toward leaving as-is for now 00:15:32 fine with me, we always have options in the future 00:17:31 i think there should be some way of aliasing module names 00:17:32 zikalino82: does devtestlab also suffer from the "async delete" problem? 00:17:46 We have a couple ways to do it already, but it's not ideal (for several reasons) 00:17:53 no, it has some other problems 00:18:15 (just looking at all the commented out tests) 00:18:26 but more related to tests.... it locks some subresources, but mattclay already did some changes in the ci to handle that 00:18:53 yea we fixed the backend to fix that issue last week 00:19:09 * jborean93 had about 200 resource groups built up by that point 00:19:32 OK, I'll give those both a quick once-over, but generally looks ok 00:19:49 zikalino82: anything else, or you gonna get back to your time off? ;) 00:20:05 i think i just commented out github related test, as we don't want to have github token stored anywhere 00:20:36 ah yeah, that could be a little tricky to do securely (and I suspect GH would not appreciate our CI making throwaway accounts ;) ) 00:21:22 yes, so i guess it's better to disable... 00:21:25 hrm, we could probably have a static value though- just wouldn't be able to test re-fetch 00:21:48 (ie, so long as the test is read-only) 00:21:54 i couldn't find that "Assert the state of the SQL Server" in vmss (fixed the doc already) 00:22:07 yeah, it was just the one this time 00:23:32 OK, anything else I should wait for on those before review? 00:24:30 i think that's all pr's i have right now, i have couple more small fixes, but can wait for Catherine, she will be back on monday 00:25:14 i think we should leave this github token test disabled for now.... 00:25:15 OK- I'll drop a comment on the winrm VM change PR reminding her that she was going to look 00:26:34 vmss doc is fixed now, just ci running 00:27:04 cool 00:27:14 OK, done for today then? 00:27:21 yes, i think so :-) 00:27:36 I'm good, unfortunately no holiday to get back to :( 00:27:51 Cool- enjoy the rest of your time off! Everyone's back for next week, right? 00:28:02 yes :-) 00:28:13 thanks a lot guys! :-) 00:29:00 Til next week! 00:29:02 #endmeeting