#ansible-community: Ansible Contributor Experience Working Group
Meeting started by gundalow at 19:00:08 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
-
- Agenda:
https://github.com/ansible/community/issues/390 (gundalow,
19:00:17)
- We define "contributor" as someone that does or
should interact with PRs (gundalow,
19:00:26)
- As discussed in Contributor Summit in Austin,
we'd setup this new group, which I'm working on full time. We are
(initially) focusing on PRs, though we are happy to fix other stuff
as we go along. It's also expected that some of this work will also
improve issues and general community stuff. (gundalow,
19:06:30)
- Where to start (gundalow, 19:06:58)
- There is loads to do, and just about anything
is "in scope", though based on discussing in Austin we will focus on
making things clearer for people, then work on adding more
contributors/maintainers/. Part of this group is about "oiling the
machine", parts is actually about sitting down and reviewing
PRs (gundalow,
19:08:37)
- Improving Docs: /community and /dev_guide (gundalow, 19:09:17)
- Plan for restructure of /community/ and
/dev_guide/
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nMevQ0W7MZgJA1tJrJbNHIhTiHYHYUlO3IHXBs_usGE/edit?ts=5be2cd87
(gundalow,
19:10:10)
- this would be replacement for
docs.ansible.com/ansible/devel/community/ (gundalow,
19:13:42)
- https://github.com/jctanner/molecule/blob/MAZER_COLLECTIONS_ANSIBLE_TEST/molecule/command/init/module.py
is a prototype of what i wanted to do with proposal 49 (jtanner,
19:20:39)
- ACTION: acozine
gundalow to think about changelog for docs, test infrastructure,
coding standards (gundalow,
19:26:55)
- AGREED: Writing/reviewing code is only one way to be a
contributor (gundalow,
19:35:09)
- How can we make it clear that if "all" someone
does is review PRs that's great (and in someways better than
contributing new_modules) (gundalow,
19:42:55)
- Can we do some diamond diagram to show
this? (gundalow,
19:43:25)
- ACTION: create issue
for tracking ideas on how to motivate reviewers. credit people in
changelog, points/badges/stars - watch out for people gaming the
system (gundalow,
19:44:40)
- Improving Docs: How to Review and test a PR (gundalow, 19:46:39)
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nMevQ0W7MZgJA1tJrJbNHIhTiHYHYUlO3IHXBs_usGE/edit?ts=5be2cd87#heading=h.kzxzqyez5fp5
(gundalow,
19:46:51)
- See the `[Docs] How to review & test a PR
#399` section (gundalow,
19:47:01)
- During Contributors Summit in Austin we
identified that we don't have any clear guidelines on how to do
local testing of a PR (gundalow,
19:49:06)
- ACTION: gundalow
needs to document his bigger picture plan (contributor workflow, why
we are starting with docs before adding people. Why we improve the
SIGs before adding people) (gundalow,
19:55:35)
- the high level plan (gundalow, 20:15:37)
- ACTION: gundalow to
do walkthough and document how to test a PR (gundalow,
20:26:00)
Meeting ended at 20:26:09 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- acozine gundalow to think about changelog for docs, test infrastructure, coding standards
- create issue for tracking ideas on how to motivate reviewers. credit people in changelog, points/badges/stars - watch out for people gaming the system
- gundalow needs to document his bigger picture plan (contributor workflow, why we are starting with docs before adding people. Why we improve the SIGs before adding people)
- gundalow to do walkthough and document how to test a PR
Action items, by person
- acozine
- acozine gundalow to think about changelog for docs, test infrastructure, coding standards
- gundalow
- acozine gundalow to think about changelog for docs, test infrastructure, coding standards
- gundalow needs to document his bigger picture plan (contributor workflow, why we are starting with docs before adding people. Why we improve the SIGs before adding people)
- gundalow to do walkthough and document how to test a PR
People present (lines said)
- gundalow (131)
- misc (43)
- acozine (30)
- felixfontein (28)
- decentral1se (25)
- jtanner (18)
- caphrim007 (14)
- zodbot (10)
- sdoran (5)
- dsoper2 (5)
- agaffney (1)
- akshay196 (1)
- bizonk (0)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.