#ansible-community: community_working_group_meeting

Meeting summary

1. 1. agenda https://github.com/ansible/community/issues/539 (felixfontein, 18:05:00)
   2. https://github.com/ansible/community/issues/539#issuecomment-643453336 https://github.com/ansible-community/antsibull/issues/94#issuecomment-643451914 (felixfontein, 18:07:37)
   
   
2. What version of ansible-base should ansible depend on? (https://github.com/ansible-community/antsibull/issues/94#issuecomment-643451914) (felixfontein, 18:07:57)
   1. Pro: changelog included in the latest ansible-2.10.x will be for the latest ansible-base (abadger1999, 18:25:06)
   2. Pro: most collections will test against the latest ansible-base-2.10.x (abadger1999, 18:25:49)
   3. Con: Prevents users from choosing to use the ansible packaged collections with an older version of ansible-base. (abadger1999, 18:26:27)
   4. ansible 2.10.x should depend on ansible-base >= 2.10.y with latest y that was around when ansible 2.10.x was built (4 yes, 1 no) (felixfontein, 18:44:04)
   
   
3. Should symlinks in c.g and c.n be removed for 1.0.0, or for later? https://github.com/ansible/community/issues/539#issuecomment-646027549 (felixfontein, 18:45:18)
   1. community.network and community.general will (try to) support ansible 2.9 at least for the 1.x.y releases (felixfontein, 18:59:58)
   
   
4. open floor (felixfontein, 19:06:47)

Action items

1. (none)

People present (lines said)

1. felixfontein (118)
2. cyberpear (43)
3. abadger1999 (40)
4. webknjaz (30)
5. zodbot (10)
6. samccann (9)
7. gundalow (7)
8. acozine (2)