15:59:21 #startmeeting Network Working Group 15:59:21 Meeting started Wed Jul 19 15:59:21 2017 UTC. The chair is funzo. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:59:21 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:59:21 The meeting name has been set to 'network_working_group' 15:59:36 o/ 15:59:40 hello 16:00:28 #chair caphrim007 newswangerd 16:00:28 Current chairs: caphrim007 funzo newswangerd 16:00:31 o/ 16:00:39 #chair rcarrillocruz 16:00:39 Current chairs: caphrim007 funzo newswangerd rcarrillocruz 16:00:43 hi 16:00:49 #chair trishnag 16:00:50 Current chairs: caphrim007 funzo newswangerd rcarrillocruz trishnag 16:00:50 * ganeshrn waves 16:01:01 #chair ganeshrn 16:01:01 Current chairs: caphrim007 funzo ganeshrn newswangerd rcarrillocruz trishnag 16:01:33 We'll get started in just a couple min 16:01:38 #link https://github.com/ansible/community/issues/110 16:01:49 * Qalthos 🌊🌊 16:02:20 #chair Qalthos jmighion 16:02:20 Current chairs: Qalthos caphrim007 funzo ganeshrn jmighion newswangerd rcarrillocruz trishnag 16:02:47 We're going to start the meeting with comment #23 on the agenda 16:03:29 #topic #26842 "Adds refactored bigip_monitor_tcp" 16:03:38 yo 16:03:51 #link https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/26842 16:03:58 hi caphrim007 16:04:34 trusty networking 16:04:38 fml 16:05:00 :) 16:05:08 that PR is just the last part of the general tcp monitor changes 16:05:10 ok, did you want to discuss this PR with the group? 16:05:25 nah, it's ready to go. it just needs a merge 16:05:29 there are some sanity checks to fix up 16:05:36 still? 16:05:51 i might be reading it wrong 16:05:52 looks green at the bottom 16:05:58 oh it says all checks have passed 16:06:06 you're right 16:06:29 typically we have someone help out with a review 16:06:46 for your previous PRs have you been self reviewing and merging? 16:06:54 funzo: i work at f5, and we own all the f5 modules 16:07:02 gundalow usually merges them 16:07:07 caphrim007: understood, got it 16:07:37 merged :) 16:07:53 roger that 16:07:56 #topic #/27035 "Allow to run tests for f5.bigip_monitor_tcp_half_open when no f5-sdk" 16:08:20 that just came up this morning 16:08:28 looks like you've already reviewed it for fred 16:08:29 i made that fix in the aforementioned tcp pr you just merged 16:08:31 o/ 16:08:37 #chair akasurde 16:08:37 Current chairs: Qalthos akasurde caphrim007 funzo ganeshrn jmighion newswangerd rcarrillocruz trishnag 16:08:43 cool 16:08:50 yeah, thanks fred, wherever you are, for catching that 16:08:59 caphrim007: is his PR still applicable? 16:09:00 the shippable tests dont catch it 16:09:07 fred's PR is 16:09:12 it fixes _echo and _half_open 16:09:15 kk 16:09:21 i'll merge 16:10:04 Hi 16:10:09 o/ 16:10:13 #chair Salman 16:10:13 Current chairs: Qalthos Salman akasurde caphrim007 funzo ganeshrn jmighion newswangerd rcarrillocruz trishnag 16:10:17 dag: are you around? 16:10:38 Hey, I also want a chair :) < Tired of standing 16:10:42 There is a suggestion on the agenda to add technology domains 16:10:54 #chair FrederikSuijs 16:10:54 Current chairs: FrederikSuijs Qalthos Salman akasurde caphrim007 funzo ganeshrn jmighion newswangerd rcarrillocruz trishnag 16:10:57 my pleasure 16:11:38 caphrim007: did you want to discuss https://github.com/F5Networks/f5-ansible/issues/281 ? 16:12:02 umm 16:12:13 just saw it as a link in the agenda 16:12:20 Please do take some time out to discuss https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/26577 i 16:12:21 is there? 16:12:38 it was probably just referenced somewhere else 16:12:40 we can move on 16:12:56 ahh yeah it was just mentioned in that pr 16:13:00 it's not ready yet in any event 16:13:01 Salman: roger that, hang on to it and we'll come back to it 16:13:01 2.5 16:13:25 FrederikSuijs: you have added an agenda item 16:13:45 Yes, no really sure if this was the right format 16:13:56 #topic ios command prompt for confirmation 16:14:34 FrederikSuijs: it's all good 16:14:54 rcarrillocruz: did you catch FrederikSuijs' question on the agenda? 16:15:04 there was some talk of ios confirmations before, I think, but I can't remember what became of it 16:15:12 rcarrillocruz: do you recall? 16:15:20 #link https://github.com/ansible/community/issues/110 16:15:24 last comment ^ 16:15:25 Thanks, it looks like some people have encountered the same issues, but I couldn't find anything recent 16:15:33 FrederikSuijs: that link from groups google seems broken 16:15:36 mind pasting here? 16:16:01 rcarrillocruz: just updated the comment. 16:16:35 oops, I might have made a typo in the link 16:16:52 interesting 16:16:52 thanks trishnag 16:17:02 mind opening a GH issue with a playbook to reproduce 16:17:04 ? 16:17:08 FrederikSuijs: so does peter's reply help you? 16:17:22 cos peter suggests there's a way to fix it, but i have to admit i've never used that response option 16:17:29 not really, is this documented ? 16:17:49 not sure 16:17:49 or some kind of hidden feature? I did try it, but couldn't get it working 16:17:51 let's do this 16:17:53 open an issue 16:17:58 with a playbook to reproduce 16:18:09 if the feature is there, and works, doc bug, i'll fix it 16:18:22 if it's a code bug, i'll fix and comment in the GH issue 16:18:37 ok, sounds like a plan! 16:18:43 #action FrederikSuijs to open issue with playbook example to reproduce 16:19:00 ok, next up... 16:19:21 Salman: you wanted to go over an issue? 16:19:34 Yes 16:19:39 https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/26577 16:19:44 #topic 26577 https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/26577 16:19:54 i have issues to setup a config to repro the problem 16:20:06 it seems the issue just appears when advertised routes are more than zero 16:20:16 Yes 16:20:26 Salman: can you provide an example to set up BGP in one or two routers 16:20:32 so the advertised-routes is more than 1 16:20:43 then once i have that set up i can repro the issue at ansible module level 16:20:52 i suspect it may be some terminal plugin regex problem 16:21:07 the fact rc is 0 or 1 depending on output leads me to think that 16:21:16 In the same thread I have given output of what exactly the bjp output looks like 16:21:32 bgp* 16:21:46 yeah, i see that, but i need a setup in the lab to get to that output 16:21:58 I can get details as in how to set it up in lab 16:22:05 i.e. setup bgp, with networks correct so they shouw up as advertised routed 16:22:14 Where shud I update that? In the agenda link? 16:22:22 k, thx, please paste that in the GH issue and then i'll move forward 16:22:27 Salman: the GH issue 16:22:37 Got it.. Will do in few hrs 16:22:40 Thanks 16:22:40 thx 16:22:45 rcarrillocruz: yup this seems a regex issue in terminal 16:23:19 #action Salman to update GH issue with bgp setup 16:23:32 Those are all the agenda items 16:23:35 ganeshrn: yah 16:23:40 https://github.com/ansible/ansible/blob/devel/lib/ansible/plugins/terminal/ios.py#L44 16:23:57 #topic open floor 16:26:12 This is not exactly network related but roughly how long do we have before 2.4 ships? 16:26:13 I just have to thanks Pete for his session today. It was great 16:26:50 mikewiebe: uncommitted timing of middle of sept given how everything comes together 16:27:28 the more feedback we get on the RC releases and reported issues earlier than later will help us get it out more quickly 16:27:54 mikewiebe: did I miss anything you put on the agenda for today? 16:28:06 funzo: are new module commits frozen atm though? 16:28:17 the previous date for that was the 15th 16:28:22 yes 16:28:24 k 16:28:28 funzo: Thanks for the info 16:28:33 you betcha 16:28:55 funzo: No you did not miss anything from the agenda. Just thought to ask now :) 16:29:06 mikewiebe: ok, great 16:29:35 I'll hang out here for a few minutes in case we have folks come up with an item for the open floor topic 16:30:37 funzo: https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/26769 16:30:49 it's functional, just battling shippable at the moment. needs a reviewer 16:32:15 jmighion: got anyone one in mind for a reviewer? 16:32:16 side question : is there a better way to restart/rerun a shippable build than closing and reopening a PR? 16:32:30 not unless you have a shippable login 16:32:51 funzo: not really. ganeshrn reviewed my last one, but it doesnt really matter to me who reviews it 16:33:06 ganeshrn: you up for reviewing it? 16:33:09 i can review this 16:33:32 #action ganeshrn to review https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/26769 16:33:52 thanks 16:33:52 just added you as reviewer on the PR 16:33:54 jmighion: there is , but you shippable account, we have a 'rebuild' button 16:34:15 you *need* i meant 16:34:28 oh yeah. i'd need merge permissions to ansible/ansible i think 16:34:34 got a shippable account 16:35:32 ah k 16:37:23 ok, last call for open floor items 16:37:51 Thank you everybody for your time today! 16:38:16 #endmeeting