19:05:44 <sdoran> #startmeeting Ansible Core Meeting
19:05:44 <zodbot> Meeting started Tue May 21 19:05:44 2019 UTC.
19:05:44 <zodbot> This meeting is logged and archived in a public location.
19:05:44 <zodbot> The chair is sdoran. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
19:05:44 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
19:05:44 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'ansible_core_meeting'
19:06:31 <felixfontein> hi!
19:06:55 <Sajna_Shetty> hi @felixfontein
19:07:14 <rajeevarakkal> hi felixfontein
19:07:45 <sdoran> #chair jillr felixfontein Sajna_Shetty rajeevarakkal
19:07:45 <zodbot> Current chairs: Sajna_Shetty felixfontein jillr rajeevarakkal sdoran
19:08:00 <sdoran> #topic https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/56345
19:08:02 <felixfontein> hi Sajna_Shetty and rajeevarakkal
19:08:09 <sdoran> sivel?
19:09:19 <sdoran> We'll come back to that one then.
19:09:23 <sdoran> #topic https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/53438
19:09:28 <sivel> nearly
19:09:40 <Sajna_Shetty> Hi
19:09:58 <Sajna_Shetty> "Our module utility -  module_utils/remote_management/dellemc/ome.py is only for meant dellemc modules, and our legal team insists GPLv3+" Shall we get an exception approval for this
19:11:36 <sivel> sdoran: I'm mostly here, finishing something up, but I
19:11:40 <sdoran> K.
19:11:44 <sivel> 'm mostly paying attention
19:11:51 <sdoran> I'm not the resident licensing expert.
19:12:34 <sivel> we're going to need a quorum for that, and I don't see us having one today
19:12:35 <Sajna_Shetty> we discussed with bcoca in devel meeting. He mentioned this needs team approval
19:12:50 <sivel> if it's just you and I, we're going to be at least 3 short
19:13:01 * alongchamps I really should set reminders for these meetings
19:13:04 <sivel> so we may have to delay until next meeting
19:13:06 <sdoran> jillr is here
19:13:20 <sdoran> Probably still need more, though.
19:13:31 <sivel> Ok, regardless we need a minimum of 5 core members for quorum
19:13:35 <jillr> given the narrow scope I'm not opposed, but we do need more of us
19:14:03 <Sajna_Shetty> okay
19:14:18 <sdoran> Sorry about that. We'll try again on Tuesday.
19:14:32 <sdoran> I'll try to get some folks to look at it before then if they have time.
19:14:36 <Sajna_Shetty> what about thursday meeting?
19:14:51 <sdoran> Oops. I have my days all mixed up. :)
19:14:55 <sdoran> I thought today was Thursday.
19:15:07 <sdoran> Yes, Thursday.
19:15:12 <felixfontein> thursday, tuesday, all the same... ;)
19:15:17 <sdoran> Exactly!
19:15:24 <jillr> I wont be here Thur, but sdoran you can put me down as no objections
19:15:33 <sdoran> 👍
19:15:47 <sdoran> #topic https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/56345
19:16:02 <sivel> need to punt this one too
19:16:10 <sdoran> 👍
19:16:18 <sdoran> #topic https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/56740
19:16:22 <sdoran> You're up felixfontein
19:16:40 <felixfontein> it's a PR making the module_utils licensing a bit more explicit, i.e. that it needs core team approval
19:16:59 <sivel> I think we can do this one today
19:17:04 <felixfontein> I don't know if you have plans to improve it otherwise, but I think this already makes it better to understand than the current version
19:17:19 <sivel> I am +1 for merging this
19:17:29 <jillr> +1
19:17:39 <sdoran> +1
19:17:58 <felixfontein> I'm also +1, but I guess I don't need to mention :)
19:20:07 <sdoran> Ok, I'll let the docs team know we're +1 to that change.
19:20:16 <sdoran> #topic Open floor
19:21:53 <felixfontein> sdoran: thanks!
19:22:00 <sdoran> Thank you.
19:23:20 <sdoran> I'll end the meeting in one minute if there are no further topics for discussion.
19:23:35 <Sajna_Shetty> @jillr thank you
19:23:58 <jillr> you're welcome Sajna_Shetty !
19:23:59 <rajeevarakkal> For PR : https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/53438 thanks sdoran, jillr, Felixfontien
19:24:53 <felixfontein> sdoran: the name 'module_util' without 's' is already used in the line above
19:25:40 <sdoran> We should change that too. :)
19:26:26 <sdoran> #endmeeting