15:59:50 #startmeeting Network Working Group 15:59:50 Meeting started Wed Jun 20 15:59:50 2018 UTC. 15:59:50 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 15:59:50 The chair is Qalthos. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:59:50 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:59:50 The meeting name has been set to 'network_working_group' 16:00:17 #chair ganeshrn gundalow privateip rcarrillocruz trishnag caphrim007 16:00:17 Current chairs: Qalthos caphrim007 ganeshrn gundalow privateip rcarrillocruz trishnag 16:00:56 o/ 16:01:04 #link https://github.com/ansible/community/issues/247 agenda 16:01:15 i can never remember if networking meetings happen here or in ansible-meeting 16:01:22 sometimes its one and other times the other 16:01:26 but...glad to be here 16:01:52 Network meetings are always in here 16:02:08 everybody else uses #ansible-meeting 16:02:16 #topic ipaddress for F5 16:02:36 i believe i've outlined my thoughts on this topic in the agenda 16:02:40 if people want to look 16:03:05 i don't see this as a long term thing with py3 becoming more and more deployed 16:03:18 but it would help to move my work off of our netaddr external dependency 16:03:33 caphrim007: I thought it was fairly well laid out 16:03:54 i looked for pre-existing work in ansible itself as part of my case 16:04:01 which is also linked in the topic 16:04:41 My main concern is that module_utils should all be *BSD* licensed... though there are many exceptions as we are not always careful to check 16:05:30 i understand. my argument was that, the language itself has this today 16:05:33 python that is 16:05:43 but it was not backported to older versions 16:05:53 and i cannot today say "everyone use py3 for f5 modules" 16:07:18 Oh I understand the need 16:07:38 well. anyway. i thought i would toss it out there instead of just going and merging it myself 16:08:16 and let it be known that it *will* be removed, as outlined in the topic 16:09:06 I just don't want to put in yet another non-BSD file in there without getting an okay from the core team, as we've had problems come up around that in the past 16:09:25 ok 16:09:44 should we call the core team in here? or should i wait until next core meeting to ask? 16:10:29 It would probably be much easier to wait until tomorrow's meeting and bring it up there 16:10:34 k 16:12:24 I think it's a fine idea, I'm just not 100% on the licensing, hopefully they can speak a bit more authoritatively about it 16:12:52 #topic Open Floor 16:13:27 Anyone else here who wants to bring something up? 16:13:59 Well, I have a minor query 16:14:03 sure 16:14:17 #cahir Anil 16:14:21 #chair Anil 16:14:21 Current chairs: Anil Qalthos caphrim007 ganeshrn gundalow privateip rcarrillocruz trishnag 16:14:38 Our GA for 2.6 is likely to happen on 2018-06-28? 16:15:28 Or will it get one week delayed ? 16:16:16 I'm not sure if we're still hitting that or not, rc3 came out yesterday, and there might be one more coming 16:17:12 Another query I have is that How can start on my plans on 2.7 now itself ? 16:17:39 I would like to change all modules in CNOS to persisistence connection in 2.7 16:18:55 I should raise PR only after 2.6 right ? 16:19:50 2.6 has been branched for a while, you can send PRs to devel right now if you want 16:20:33 ok.. got it.. 16:22:16 Thanks, thats all from my side, CNOS is changing to Cisco style CLI, so I have to factor in that changes as well taking care of backward compatibility as well 16:24:40 Anil: That sounds like... fun. Good luck with all that and let us know if you have trouble 16:24:50 Anyone else? 16:39:56 Right, have a good week, then 16:40:09 Thanks all for coming 16:40:13 #endmeeting