16:02:29 #startmeeting Ansible Network Working Group 16:02:29 Meeting started Wed May 1 16:02:29 2019 UTC. 16:02:29 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 16:02:29 The chair is pabelanger. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:02:29 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 16:02:29 The meeting name has been set to 'ansible_network_working_group' 16:02:38 hello 16:02:43 hello 16:02:51 #chair dagrawal ganeshrn gundalow ikhan justjais nilashishc pabelanger privateip trishnag Qalthos 16:02:51 Current chairs: Qalthos dagrawal ganeshrn gundalow ikhan justjais nilashishc pabelanger privateip trishnag 16:03:25 lets jump right into it 16:03:27 #topic Core Updates 16:03:47 #info Ansible 2.8.0rc2 this week 16:04:06 from what I see, the core team is on track to tag that this week 16:04:46 So far, I don't see any big blockers, so I expect 2.8 is still on track to be release in the next few weeks 16:04:51 pycon/rh summit might 'distract' though 16:05:00 good point 16:05:55 on the ansible-network side of things, we are making good progress on adding network vendor images to zuul.ansible.com (https://dashboard.zuul.ansible.com/) 16:06:31 so far, we have a vyos-1.1.8 image online, and hopefully this week, we'll be adding vEOS-4.20.10M 16:07:31 #topic Meraki PRs 16:07:59 it looks like we have a request from mrproper to look at 2 PRs: https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/48820 and https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/49015 16:08:19 I do know we didn't have our weekly bug review this week because of holidays for some team members 16:08:35 I'm online. 16:09:08 I'd like a review of the PRs. We can take the discussion off the meeting if it's in depth as well. 16:09:25 looking at 48820 I think it is just a matter of getting some eyes on it, having tests there does help 16:10:02 Yeah, I think #48820 is probably fine, now that the version is updated 16:10:15 while 49015 does have tests it seems, it does look like some humans are doing reviews 16:10:58 Qalthos: thanks, I know you have your plate full, is that something you want to look into or should we wait until other teammates are back onlie 16:11:00 online* 16:13:31 I don't see anything obviously wrong with either. I rekicked tests for #49015 to get rid of stale_ci, and if that passes, I think they can get merged 16:13:47 okay great 16:14:04 mrproper: sounds like Qalthos will help out here 16:14:23 Excellent. Thanks Qalthos and team 16:14:39 #topic vrf option to static routes 16:14:50 this one actually is merged now: https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/55298 16:14:57 so I don't think we need to spend much time on it 16:15:01 twbowman: ^ 16:15:07 I just wanted to circle around to make sure all was followed. 16:15:14 seems like it was. thanks. 16:15:45 Yah, Qalthos seem to have done a review / merge just before this meeting 16:15:47 thanks Qalthos 16:15:51 moving on 16:15:55 thanks 16:16:09 #topic Open discussion 16:16:36 at this point, there wasn't anything lists on our meeting for this week 16:16:42 does anybody else have any items? 16:17:32 https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/54894 16:17:41 we would like to get attention to this pending PR 16:17:53 we have rebased it and modified it for 2.9 16:20:20 grastogi: yah, we should be able to triage that for next week 16:20:30 thanks 16:20:54 I can confirm with team after meeting also 16:21:10 #action pabelanger request for review on https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/54894 16:23:00 okay, if nothing else I'll close out the meeting in a few minutes, and we can get some of our day back 16:26:26 okay, thanks again everybody 16:26:31 #endmeeting