20:00:36 #startmeeting Ansible Windows Working Group 20:00:36 Meeting started Tue Apr 9 20:00:36 2019 UTC. 20:00:36 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 20:00:36 The chair is nitzmahone. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 20:00:36 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 20:00:36 The meeting name has been set to 'ansible_windows_working_group' 20:01:00 #chair jborean93 dag jhawkesworth 20:01:00 Current chairs: dag jborean93 jhawkesworth nitzmahone 20:01:03 hey 20:01:22 Hey 20:01:35 * jborean93 on a train so will be slow to respond 20:01:56 So the only item on the meeting agenda is what to do about the problems introduced to win_domain_membership from the Get-ADObject changes 20:02:42 Unless it’s an easy swap over to the .NET classes we should revert and try again for 2.9 20:02:43 * jhawkesworth re-reading the PR 20:02:52 That's what I'm leaning toward as well 20:02:55 iirc there's adsi 20:03:07 im not sure if itd work here though since i dont do much .net 20:03:08 That module needs to keep working reliably 20:03:22 The credentials bit is the hardest 20:03:32 I'm sure we can make it work, but I don't want it to be unstable for a couple releases of 2.8 while we figure it out 20:03:50 coworker says this works https://gist.github.com/smaslennikov/c0921fe7a26a8bd9cccf3b175955162b 20:03:51 Anybody have major objections to reverting for 2.8? 20:04:10 yes it would be better if it was in a 2.8.something release than borked, so no objection from me to reverting 20:04:22 Well, it'd be 2.9 20:04:28 sorry yeah 2.9 20:04:35 next major release 20:04:41 13th hour at the keyboard today so far, not at my best! 20:04:47 hehe likewise 20:04:57 #agreed revert https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/53542 20:05:02 +1 20:05:25 OK, sounds good 20:05:28 #topic open floor 20:05:59 2.8 "full freeze" is Wednesday night Pacific 20:06:14 cool 20:06:15 * chopraaa looks at the time 20:06:22 tonight :o 20:06:34 early testing so far has been pretty smooth 20:06:40 Anything we need to add to v2.8 still ? 20:06:41 It's been delayed a few times for various reasons, but looks like it's a go this time (~28 hours from now) 20:07:03 I think my win_xml refactor has missed the boat now 20:07:29 pleased to get improved win_nssm and win_format in though 20:07:29 wasnt that good to go last time? 20:07:50 still waiting on review from original module author 20:08:34 i was curious how that worked, because the author of the proxmox module is MIA is as well and it's broken as hell 20:09:29 If someone's willing to take over an abandoned thing and can show they have enough chops to keep it up, we'll usually let them 20:10:28 * chopraaa nudges jhawkesworth 20:10:39 I don't think win_xml is abandoned at this point 20:10:46 Oh, jhawkesworth, I hadn't seen you actually marked win_xml as good to go; I can review that and merge it assuming no blockers 20:11:13 or would you rather have all of 2.9 dev cycle to let it "soak"? (basically merge after we branch 2.8)- your call 20:11:23 thanks yeah sorry it was work-in-progress for a long time 20:11:32 yeah actually 2.9 much better idea 20:12:00 i changed it a lot and its possible there are xpaths out there that will now do things they didn't before 20:12:34 (cos it doesn't just pick first matching node/nodes any more, but processes list of nodes that the xpath matched 20:14:32 nothing else from me. Anyone else? 20:15:21 nothing here 20:15:46 OK, if nothing else, closing in 5.. 20:15:49 4.. 20:15:52 3.. 20:15:56 2.. 20:15:58 1.. 20:16:03 Thanks all- til next week! 20:16:05 #endmeeting