===================================== # #blocker-review:fedoraproject.org: F43-blocker-review ===================================== Meeting started by @adamwill:fedora.im at 2025-09-15 16:00:37 Meeting summary --------------- * TOPIC: Roll Call (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:00:40) * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:07:20) * INFO: Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:07:20) * TOPIC: Introduction (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:07:20) * INFO: We'll be following the process outlined at: (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:07:20) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:07:20) * INFO: The bugs up for review today are available at: (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:07:20) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_43_Final_Release_Criteria (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:07:20) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_43_Beta_Release_Criteria (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:07:20) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Basic_Release_Criteria (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:07:20) * INFO: The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:07:20) * INFO: for F43 Final, we have: (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:07:54) * INFO: 7 Accepted Blockers (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:07:55) * INFO: 8 Proposed Blockers (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:07:55) * INFO: lruzicka will secretarialize (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:10:07) * TOPIC: Proposed Final blockers (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:10:13) * INFO: Proposed Blocker, arm-image-installer, NEW (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:10:22) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2391231 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:10:22) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1923 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:10:22) * TOPIC: (2391231) Fails to create boot medium for Fedora Server on Radxa Rock Pi 4 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:10:22) * AGREED: 2391231 RejectedBlocker AcceptedFreezeException - this is rejected as it's specific to the Server aarch64 disk image and that image is not release-blocking, per https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/releases/f43/blocking/ . it's accepted as an FE as it's obviously a significant bug that cannot be fully resolved with a post-release update (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:35:49) * TOPIC: (2394950) No thumbnails for video, music, epub and pdf formats (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:35:58) * INFO: Ticket vote: FinalFreezeException (+1,0,-0) (+kparal) (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:35:58) * INFO: Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+2,0,-1) (+nielsenb, +derekenz, -kparal) (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:35:58) * INFO: Proposed Blocker, distribution, NEW, depends on other bugs (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:35:58) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1926 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:35:58) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2394950 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:35:58) * AGREED: 2394950 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - this is accepted as a violation of "the following applications must start successfully and withstand a basic functionality test" for the file manager. it's a close call, but we think thumbnails are sufficiently important that it'd create a very bad impression for them to be broken (@lruzicka:fedora.im, 16:58:48) * INFO: Proposed Blocker, dracut, ASSIGNED (@lruzicka:fedora.im, 17:02:26) * TOPIC: (2394213) default hostonly-mode "sloppy" results in significant increase in initramfs size (@lruzicka:fedora.im, 17:02:26) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2394213 (@lruzicka:fedora.im, 17:02:26) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1925 (@lruzicka:fedora.im, 17:02:26) * INFO: Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+2,0,-0) (+derekenz, +nielsenb) (@lruzicka:fedora.im, 17:02:26) * AGREED: 2394213 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - this is accepted as a violation of "Upgrade requirements" criterion because increasing the initramfs space makes the system unable to upgrade if the space on the boot partition is taken by bigger images. We think that this is serious enough to be addressed before the Final release. (@lruzicka:fedora.im, 17:28:42) * INFO: Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+0,0,-1) (-nielsenb) (@lruzicka:fedora.im, 17:29:32) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2391242 (@lruzicka:fedora.im, 17:29:32) * TOPIC: (2391242) Firefox slows down significantly when private mode invoked (@lruzicka:fedora.im, 17:29:32) * INFO: Proposed Blocker, firefox, NEW (@lruzicka:fedora.im, 17:29:32) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1896 (@lruzicka:fedora.im, 17:29:32) * AGREED: 2391242 - punt (delay decision) - we agreed to punt this one as the exact details of the problem are still not clear. we'll continue working with upstream(s) to clarify the issue for next week's meeting (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:53:20) * INFO: Proposed Blocker, glycin, ON_QA (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:53:31) * TOPIC: (2393593) Crashes in prefer_sve_ifuncs/__uname on SVE enabled machine due to seccomp filter (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:53:31) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2393593 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:53:31) * INFO: Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+2,0,-0) (+nielsenb, +derekenz) (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:53:31) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1917 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:53:31) * AGREED: 2393593 - punt (delay decision) - the call on whether this affects enough hardware to be a blocker is complex, and practically speaking, it should get closed relatively soon when the update goes stable anyway, so we can avoid spending time on it (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:10:50) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1927 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:10:59) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2372978 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:10:59) * TOPIC: (2372978) packagekitd runs in infinite loop consuming lot of CPU (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:10:59) * INFO: Proposed Blocker, PackageKit, NEW (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:10:59) * AGREED: 2372978 - punt (delay decision) - we weren't able to reproduce this on a clean f43 beta install in a quick test, so we want to punt to try and get more detail on when and why this issue happens (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:29:26) * TOPIC: (2394561) SELinux is preventing systemd from 'open' accesses on the file /tmp/webui-cockpit-ws.env. (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:29:35) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2394561 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:29:35) * INFO: Proposed Blocker, selinux-policy, ASSIGNED (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:29:35) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1922 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:29:35) * INFO: Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+4,0,-0) (+geraldosimiao, +derekenz, +nielsenb, +kparal) (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:29:35) * AGREED: 2394561 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - this is accepted as a violation of "There must be no SELinux denial notifications or crash notifications on boot of or during installation from a release-blocking live image..." (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:33:06) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1921 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:33:19) * INFO: Proposed Blocker, spice-vdagent, NEW (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:33:19) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2394505 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:33:19) * TOPIC: (2394505) copy and paste doesn't not work between f42 host and f43 guest (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:33:19) * INFO: Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+0,0,-3) (-boniboyblue, -nielsenb, -kparal) (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:33:19) * INFO: Ticket vote: FinalFreezeException (+1,0,-0) (+kparal) (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:33:19) * AGREED: 2394505 - RejectedBlocker (Final) AcceptedFreezeException (Final) - this clearly doesn't meet the blocker criteria (note it's been broken forever on KDE and we're not blocking on that), but it's very annoying and would be good to ensure it's fixed on the Final workstation live if we can, so accepted as an FE (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:43:41) * TOPIC: Accepted Final Blockers (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:44:15) * INFO: all but one of these are 'image oversize' blockers, i will take appropriate action on those (mostly, propose increasing the limits) (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:44:40) * ACTION: adamw to deal with all the image oversize bugs, somehow or other (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:44:50) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1888 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:44:58) * INFO: Accepted Blocker, gjs, NEW (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:44:58) * TOPIC: (2391291) Switching on magnifier keeps crashing Gnome Shell (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:44:58) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2391291 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:44:58) * INFO: upstream asked us for a js stack trace, we will try to provide one (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:50:06) * ACTION: lruzicka to try and provide requested info in https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gjs/-/issues/705#note_2548444 , kparal and adamw to assist if necessary (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:50:23) * TOPIC: Open floor (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:50:38) Meeting ended at 2025-09-15 18:52:52 Action items ------------ * adamw to deal with all the image oversize bugs, somehow or other * lruzicka to try and provide requested info in https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gjs/-/issues/705#note_2548444 , kparal and adamw to assist if necessary People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * @adamwill:fedora.im (203) * @lruzicka:fedora.im (86) * @nielsenb:fedora.im (80) * @conan_kudo:matrix.org (75) * @pboy:fedora.im (27) * @cmurf:fedora.im (18) * @jlinton:fedora.im (15) * @derekenz:fedora.im (14) * @aggraxis:fedora.im (14) * @decathorpe:fedora.im (11) * @zodbot:fedora.im (10) * @mcatanzaro:gnome.org (9) * @supakeen:fedora.im (3) * @meetbot:fedora.im (2) * @kparal:matrix.org (2) * @patrikp:matrix.org (1) * @boniboyblue:fedora.im (1)