===================================== # #blocker-review:fedoraproject.org: F43-blocker-review ===================================== Meeting started by @adamwill:fedora.im at 2025-10-06 16:00:23 Meeting summary --------------- * TOPIC: Roll Call (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:00:27) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_43_Beta_Release_Criteria (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:06:14) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Basic_Release_Criteria (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:06:14) * INFO: The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:06:14) * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:06:14) * INFO: Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:06:14) * INFO: We'll be following the process outlined at: (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:06:14) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:06:14) * TOPIC: Introduction (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:06:14) * INFO: The bugs up for review today are available at: (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:06:14) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_43_Final_Release_Criteria (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:06:14) * INFO: for Final, we have 3 proposed blockers and 2 proposed FEs (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:06:31) * INFO: Lukáš Růžička will secretarialize (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:07:20) * TOPIC: Proposed Final blockers (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:07:46) * INFO: Proposed Blocker, edk2, NEW (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:08:01) * TOPIC: (2401623) fedora ISOs will not boot in qemu-kvm using UEFI (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:08:01) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2401623 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:08:01) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1956 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:08:01) * INFO: Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+0,0,-3) (-nielsenb, -kashyapc, -derekenz) (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:08:01) * AGREED: 2401623 - punt (delay decision) - we agreed to punt this so we can ask Gerd exactly what combination of properties is necessary to trigger this bug, and make an assessment of how common that's likely to be (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:21:51) * INFO: Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+3,0,-0) (+augenauf, +lruzicka, +nielsenb) (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:22:36) * TOPIC: (2400488) libdnf context is not reading and enforcing protected packages, causing PackageKit to not honor protected packages settings (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:22:36) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2400488 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:22:36) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1952 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:22:36) * INFO: Proposed Blocker, libdnf, NEW (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:22:36) * INFO: Ticket vote: FinalFreezeException (+2,0,-0) (+kparal, +nielsenb) (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:22:36) * AGREED: 2400488 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - this is accepted on the proviso that we also amend the FInal criterion as proposed by kparal in https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1952#comment-988437 . this will be accepted as a violation of that amended criterion (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:02:31) * INFO: Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+0,0,-3) (-kparal, -derekenz, -nielsenb) (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:02:40) * TOPIC: (2363937) Version upgrade from Fedora 41 to 42 disables postfix.service (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:02:40) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2363937 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:02:40) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1957 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:02:40) * INFO: Proposed Blocker, systemd, NEW (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:02:40) * AGREED: 2363937 - punt (delay decision) - this doesn't look like it violates the criteria so far, but we would like to look into it more before making a final decision (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:23:20) * TOPIC: Proposed Final freeze exceptions (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:23:32) * INFO: Ticket vote: FinalFreezeException (+1,3,-0) (+asciiwolf, kparal, geraldosimiao, nielsenb) (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:23:44) * TOPIC: (2388961) glycin backend saving jpg format with alpha channel does not work at all (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:23:44) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2388961 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:23:44) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1949 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:23:44) * INFO: Proposed Freeze Exceptions, gdk-pixbuf2, NEW (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:23:44) * INFO: Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+0,0,-6) (-kparal, -kashyapc, -derekenz, -geraldosimiao, -nielsenb, -boniboyblue) (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:23:44) * AGREED: 2388961 - RejectedFreezeException (Final) - there's still been no clear rationale for why this bug as described would justify a freeze exception. we will reconsider this decision if any such justification appears (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:46:56) * TOPIC: (2400488) libdnf context is not reading and enforcing protected packages, causing PackageKit to not honor protected packages settings (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:47:07) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2400488 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:47:07) * INFO: Ticket vote: FinalFreezeException (+2,0,-0) (+kparal, +nielsenb) (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:47:07) * INFO: Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+3,0,-0) (+augenauf, +lruzicka, +nielsenb) (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:47:07) * INFO: Proposed Freeze Exceptions, libdnf, NEW (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:47:07) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1952 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:47:07) * AGREED: 2400488 - AcceptedFreezeException (Final) - this was provisionally accepted as a blocker earlier, but we also definitely accept it as an FE, just in case the blocker status ultimately falls through somehow. It's definitely a big enough problem, and one you could potentially face on first boot, that we would like it fixed for release even if it's not a blocker (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:50:34) * TOPIC: Accepted Final blockers (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:50:45) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2387466 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:50:57) * TOPIC: (2387466) Fedora 43: Server boot aarch64 image exceeds maximum size (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:50:57) * INFO: Accepted Blocker, distribution, ASSIGNED (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:50:57) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1869 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:50:57) * INFO: this should be fixed when https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-d2a4ad264a goes stable, please test and karma (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:57:47) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1925 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:58:38) * INFO: Accepted Blocker, dracut, MODIFIED (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:58:38) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2394213 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:58:38) * TOPIC: (2394213) default hostonly-mode "sloppy" results in significant increase in initramfs size (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:58:38) * INFO: this is still kinda stuck. we're still waiting for pvalena to make *any* change for F43 - for some reason, he applied https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dracut/c/97f1cfa5b57c8a84b2c01de10d7c59e91091799b?branch=f42 to F42, but not to F43 - and we're still waiting for tests of whether that change is sufficient to return image sizes to what they were with dracut 105, ignoring growth caused by changes to nvidia firmware (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:07:48) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1943 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:12:45) * TOPIC: (2397086) Drop-down menus not working over RDP in Anaconda (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:12:45) * INFO: Accepted Blocker, gnome-remote-desktop, NEW (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:12:45) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2397086 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:12:45) * INFO: we're waiting for some kind of dev input or debugging suggestions on this. we've asked the workstation group to take a look at it (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:17:20) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2396309 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:17:32) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1937 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:17:32) * TOPIC: (2396309) Radxa Rock Pi 4 and Pine64 RockPro64 boards fail to boot with Kiwi-produced images, probably all RockChip models (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:17:32) * INFO: Accepted Blocker, kiwi, ON_QA (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:17:32) * INFO: Peter Boy (ServerWG, Docs) says there are still issues with both minimal and workstation boot on affected devices, he will provide more detailed information this week (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:20:04) * TOPIC: (2394561) SELinux is preventing systemd from 'open' accesses on the file /tmp/webui-cockpit-ws.env. (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:21:51) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1922 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:21:51) * INFO: Accepted Blocker, selinux-policy, VERIFIED (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:21:51) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2394561 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:21:51) * INFO: looks like the fix here is verified and we just need to get the update pushed stable (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:22:02) * TOPIC: Open floor (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:22:40) Meeting ended at 2025-10-06 18:34:20 Action items ------------ People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * @adamwill:fedora.im (201) * @nielsenb:fedora.im (48) * @kparal:matrix.org (46) * @kashyapc:fedora.im (28) * @conan_kudo:matrix.org (28) * @cmurf:fedora.im (25) * @lruzicka:fedora.im (23) * @pboy:fedora.im (19) * @derekenz:fedora.im (13) * @zodbot:fedora.im (8) * @matthiasc:gnome.org (5) * @meetbot:fedora.im (2) * @nhanlon:beeper.com (1)