19:00:06 <smooge> #startmeeting Fedora Infrastructure Ops Daily Standup Meeting
19:00:06 <smooge> #chair smooge nirik relrod
19:00:06 <smooge> #info meeting is 30 minutes MAX. At the end of 30, its stops
19:00:06 <smooge> #info agenda is at https://board.net/p/fedora-infra-daily
19:00:06 <zodbot> Meeting started Tue Dec 10 19:00:06 2019 UTC.
19:00:06 <zodbot> This meeting is logged and archived in a public location.
19:00:06 <zodbot> The chair is smooge. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
19:00:06 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
19:00:06 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting'
19:00:06 <zodbot> Current chairs: nirik relrod smooge
19:00:07 <smooge> \
19:00:11 <smooge> Hello everyone
19:00:24 <nirik> hey
19:00:31 <smooge> #topic Tickets needing review
19:00:31 <smooge> #info https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues
19:00:48 <smooge> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8454
19:00:50 <nirik> .ticket 8454
19:00:51 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8454: Public storage request for multi-arch "unofficial" FCOS builds - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8454
19:00:51 <nirik> yeah
19:01:01 <nirik> we basically have 3 options for this one...
19:01:17 <nirik> people space, alt space on master mirrors, or s3 bucket.
19:01:42 <smooge> so I think s3 bucket. I was actually thinking that we look at removing our alt space and putting it in buckets
19:01:54 <nirik> well, thats going to take some work
19:02:08 <smooge> oh I figure just a weeked or two :P
19:02:14 <nirik> because everyone who needs to upload to those buckets will need an account setup and a policy
19:02:22 <nirik> and will need tokens, etc.
19:02:31 <nirik> but yeah, we can do it, just needs work.
19:02:52 <nirik> so I guess assign to me?
19:03:02 <nirik> also we should ask for more info...
19:03:21 <nirik> who exactly is going to be uploading? one person? a group? via cli/automation?
19:04:33 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- smooge commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8454: "Public storage request for multi-arch "unofficial" FCOS builds" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8454#comment-615948
19:04:42 * cverna is around
19:04:58 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.tag.added -- smooge tagged ticket fedora-infrastructure#8454: aws https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8454
19:04:59 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- smooge edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8454 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8454
19:05:42 <smooge> nirik, I was wondering if it was connected to the non ticket request on automated FAS accounts
19:06:06 <nirik> no, I don't think those are related at all.
19:06:25 <nirik> so thats the only needs review...
19:06:32 <smooge> ok next up?
19:06:35 <nirik> do we want to just stop? or any other ones to discuss?
19:06:46 <smooge> #topic Tickets needing review
19:06:46 <smooge> #info https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues
19:06:51 <smooge> no wrong thing
19:07:02 <smooge> #topic Current tickets being worked on (1 ticket per ops)
19:07:04 <nirik> how about looking at the awaiting reporter ones
19:07:17 <smooge> This was just mainly to look at one we are trying to operate on to get done.
19:07:36 <nirik> ah sure.
19:07:57 <nirik> I am working now on the ppc64le builders... trying to finish that this week. I don't think there is an open ticket for it tho. ;(
19:08:27 <smooge> I am today focusing on getting nagios-plugins updated to 2.3.1 so I can hand the package off. After that is done I am going to start on https://pagure.io/user/smooge/issues
19:09:10 <nirik> can we close 7125?
19:09:54 <cverna> I think so :)
19:10:12 <cverna> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7125
19:10:16 <nirik> and 5120 linkely, as we are moving away from zanata? but we deployed that so we should figure out if we need to retire it now?
19:10:23 <nirik> .ticket 7125
19:10:24 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #7125: RFR: repoSpanner - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7125
19:10:27 <smooge> nirik, 7125 can be closed
19:10:27 <nirik> .ticket 5120
19:10:28 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #5120: [RFR] zanata2fedmsg - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/5120
19:10:29 <cverna> L)
19:10:31 <cverna> :)
19:10:57 <cverna> we could ping the requester in 5120 asking if that can be retired
19:11:06 <smooge> I thought we did
19:11:13 <nirik> +1
19:11:19 * cverna clicks on the ticket
19:11:40 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- smooge edited the close_status and status fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#5120 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/5120
19:11:46 <nirik> .ticket 5478 is waiting for abompard I think, to move a mailing list... perhaps we should come up with some other soltuion there as it's been a long long time.
19:11:46 <zodbot> nirik: Error: "5478 is waiting for abompard I think, to move a mailing list... perhaps we should come up with some other soltuion there as it's been a long long time." is not a valid integer.
19:12:00 <nirik> .ticket 5478
19:12:02 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #5478: Establishing a new FAS group for Python-SIG - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/5478
19:13:15 <smooge> nirik, so I was thinking my next 'project' should be on moving mailman to either el8 or fedora-N . I should put in a ticket to track that but wanted to see if you had other plans
19:13:31 <cverna> yeah I don't think abompard will have much time to focus on that
19:13:59 <cverna> we could ask on the infra list if people want to help with packaging if this is a blocker
19:14:09 <nirik> smooge: well, that was on my list, but you can take it if you want. ;) I'm not sure the state of the fedora packages currently, I doubt its in epel8 yet...
19:14:55 <nirik> cverna: yeah, there might be some more. I know the base stuff is already in.
19:15:29 <nirik> I think pingou did 8444...
19:15:33 <nirik> .ticket 8444
19:15:34 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8444: Decomission ci-cc-rdu01 - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8444
19:15:37 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.new -- smooge opened a new ticket fedora-infrastructure#8455: "Move mailman to newer release of Fedora or CentOS" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8455
19:16:32 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.assigned.added -- smooge assigned ticket fedora-infrastructure#8455 to smooge https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8455
19:16:57 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.tag.added -- smooge tagged ticket fedora-infrastructure#8455: lists https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8455
19:16:58 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- smooge edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8455 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8455
19:17:01 <cverna> .ticket 8302
19:17:02 <zodbot> cverna: Issue #8302: add goern to communishift group - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8302
19:17:12 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.tag.added -- smooge tagged ticket fedora-infrastructure#8455: backlog https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8455
19:17:23 <cverna> this one is kind of stuck :(
19:17:33 <cverna> I am not sure what was the decision on tha
19:17:57 <nirik> yeah, I don't think there was a decision...
19:18:13 <nirik> I'd personally be inclined to just grant them access...
19:18:18 <nirik> but it would be good to have some policy
19:18:44 <smooge> a policy for 'what services should run in communishift?'
19:18:58 <nirik> no, a policy for who can have access for what.
19:19:12 <nirik> is it 'anyone working on an open source thing'
19:19:21 <nirik> or 'anyone working on a fedora related thing'
19:20:17 <nirik> smooge: I think we can close https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7260 and https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8133 (or make them blocked by the new mailman ticket you made and close when thats done?)
19:20:21 <nirik> oh, and https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7861
19:22:20 * nirik shuts up and lets cverna / smooge chime in
19:22:37 <smooge> ok will do so
19:22:52 <smooge> sorry was looking up policies and hit a rabbit hole
19:23:36 <cverna> the dmarc is a little out of my knowledge but if no update for 6 months or so I would just close the ticket tbh
19:24:00 <nirik> well, it may well be something fixed uptream... we are on a much older version now
19:24:10 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.dependency.added -- smooge added ticket fedora-infrastructure#8455 as a dependency of ticket fedora-infrastructure#7861 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8455
19:24:15 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.assigned.added -- smooge assigned ticket fedora-infrastructure#7861 to smooge https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7861
19:24:44 <cverna> we don't seems to have many people complaining about it tho. at least the ticket is very quiet
19:25:38 <cverna> let's link it to the mailman update then :)
19:26:27 <smooge> on phone
19:27:43 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.dependency.added -- smooge added ticket fedora-infrastructure#8455 as a dependency of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8133 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8455
19:28:36 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.assigned.added -- smooge assigned ticket fedora-infrastructure#7260 to smooge https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7260
19:28:37 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.dependency.added -- smooge added ticket fedora-infrastructure#8455 as a dependency of ticket fedora-infrastructure#7260 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8455
19:28:45 <smooge> ok I have done those
19:29:21 <smooge> we are coming up to the half-hour. anything else for today?
19:29:39 <nirik> nope, lets enditall
19:29:49 <smooge> #topic Ending meeting
19:29:49 <smooge> #info Thank you all for coming. See you next business day.
19:29:49 <smooge> #endmeeting