19:00:04 <smooge> #startmeeting Fedora Infrastructure Ops Daily Standup Meeting
19:00:04 <zodbot> Meeting started Mon Feb 17 19:00:04 2020 UTC.
19:00:04 <zodbot> This meeting is logged and archived in a public location.
19:00:04 <zodbot> The chair is smooge. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
19:00:04 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
19:00:04 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting'
19:00:05 <smooge> #chair cverna mboddu nirik relrod smooge
19:00:05 <zodbot> Current chairs: cverna mboddu nirik relrod smooge
19:00:05 <smooge> #info meeting is 30 minutes MAX. At the end of 30, its stops
19:00:05 <smooge> #info agenda is at https://board.net/p/fedora-infra-daily
19:00:06 <smooge> #topic Tickets needing review
19:00:07 <smooge> #info https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues?status=Open&priority=1
19:00:22 <nirik> morning all
19:00:42 <nirik> .ticket 8654
19:00:43 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8654: New F32 test machine - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8654
19:00:54 <nirik> I can do this one as part of moving the maintainer tests...
19:01:02 <nirik> I guess I was just gonna move them to aws.
19:01:20 <smooge> yeah that sounds about right
19:01:24 <nirik> unless someone objects? we will have to figure out the ppc64le one tho
19:01:58 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.assigned.added -- smooge assigned ticket fedora-infrastructure#8654 to kevin https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8654
19:01:59 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- smooge edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8654 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8654
19:02:18 <nirik> .ticket 8656
19:02:19 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8656: Module build error: "Package not in list for f33-modular-updates-candidate" - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8656
19:02:31 <nirik> this seems like a releng one. ;) mboddu: did modules get rebuilt?
19:03:25 <nirik> or we missed adding them at branching or something.
19:03:56 <smooge> I wasn't sure if it was that or some other mbs issue
19:04:05 <nirik> ➜  ~ koji list-pkgs --tag=f32-modular-updates-candidate | wc -l
19:04:06 <nirik> 265
19:04:06 <nirik> ➜  ~ koji list-pkgs --tag=f33-modular-updates-candidate | wc -l
19:04:06 <nirik> 5
19:04:10 <nirik> no, it's koji.
19:04:36 <nirik> so not sure if all those need added or what.
19:04:38 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.tag.added -- smooge tagged ticket fedora-infrastructure#8656: mbs and releng https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8656
19:04:39 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- smooge edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8656 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8656
19:05:09 <nirik> .ticket 8657
19:05:10 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8657: `fedpkg module-build` fails with "The modulemd libreoffice.yaml is invalid. Please verify the syntax is correct." upon buildopts: arches: [x86_64] - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8657
19:05:19 <nirik> this one is mbs. ;)
19:05:37 <nirik> I guess we will need to check what they mention and check with mbs developers.
19:05:44 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.tag.added -- smooge tagged ticket fedora-infrastructure#8656: koji https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8656
19:05:45 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.tag.removed -- smooge removed the mbs tags from ticket fedora-infrastructure#8656 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8656
19:05:58 <nirik> .ticket 8658
19:05:59 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8658: cantata missing from https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/ - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8658
19:06:09 <nirik> this is that packages is just broken.
19:06:11 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.tag.added -- smooge tagged ticket fedora-infrastructure#8657: mbs and releng https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8657
19:06:12 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- smooge edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8657 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8657
19:06:20 <nirik> we should close in favor of the upstream thing...
19:06:22 * nirik looks for it
19:07:11 <nirik> https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/issues/410 I guess
19:08:05 <smooge> I am not sure exactly what to say in the ticket ot close upstream
19:08:17 <smooge> without being completely wrong
19:09:01 <nirik> I can do it...
19:10:06 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- kevin edited the close_status and status fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8658 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8658
19:10:07 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- kevin commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8658: "cantata missing from https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8658#comment-626930
19:10:23 <nirik> .ticket 8659
19:10:24 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8659: openshift: allow for users to be able to start a rollout of a deployment - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8659
19:10:42 <nirik> I guess this is fine.. .the playbooks already do this I think.
19:11:54 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.tag.added -- kevin tagged ticket fedora-infrastructure#8659: OpenShift https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8659
19:11:55 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- kevin edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8659 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8659
19:11:56 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- kevin commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8659: "openshift: allow for users to be able to start a rollout of a deployment" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8659#comment-626932
19:12:17 <nirik> ok, thats all the needs review
19:12:20 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- mohanboddu commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8656: "Module build error: "Package not in list for f33-modular-updates-candidate"" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8656#comment-626934
19:12:51 <mboddu> ^ I will take a look
19:13:35 <nirik> smooge: ok, any others you want to talk about?
19:13:44 <nirik> seems people have dumped a pile on us again...
19:13:48 <smooge> ok for this week, I intend to finish up the last of the aarch64 boxes, install the virhost-comm server replacements, get the COPR box to sort of work
19:14:12 <nirik> so, on the aarch64's... the ones left only have 1 drive?
19:14:43 <smooge> well I need to readjust them. the 1 disk boxes are the qa boxes but I installed some of the virthost ones as that
19:15:01 <smooge> so it is fix dns, reinstall and turn over
19:15:05 <nirik> I used the 17/18 ones you setup... do you mean you need to redo them?
19:15:21 <smooge> no openqa-aarch64-01 needs to be virthost19
19:15:53 <smooge> openqa-aarch64-02 needs to be cloud box
19:16:08 <nirik> vh19? so it's an x86_64 one?
19:16:26 <smooge> no sorry vmhost-aarch64-19
19:16:36 <smooge> trying to type quickly
19:16:45 <nirik> ah. ok. so wait, how many are left now?
19:16:52 <nirik> should be 5? or is there 6?
19:17:09 <nirik> or more?
19:17:49 * nirik has lost track, or forgotten or something
19:18:16 <smooge> by my count I have 7
19:18:34 <smooge> 3 with 1 drive, 4 with 2 drive
19:19:20 <nirik> ah ha.
19:19:29 <smooge> but 1 box dropped off over the weekend and I need to figure out why
19:20:10 <smooge> oh because I moved it to so I could get it on a network
19:20:14 <nirik> so... lets see. how were you gonna allocate them?
19:20:34 <nirik> adamw: how much space does a aarch64 openqa worker need?
19:21:54 <smooge> so for the openqa boxes, I was going see what kind of drives they have in them and if they have spare caddies. if they did I was going to see if I had 'spare' disks in the boxes that could be used to make them 2 disk systems. Then I was going to reinstall them, move their eth1 cable over to the QA network and go from there
19:22:46 <nirik> ok, but we should ask adamw how much space they need... because I think they just mostly use nfs from the master node...
19:22:54 <nirik> so, 1 disk might be ok for them
19:23:08 <smooge> for the 4 systems with 2 drives.. I was thinking 2 of them would become virthost-aarch64 boxes and 2 would be sent to IAD2
19:23:37 <nirik> so, we are actually all caught up for aarch64/armv7 builders (ie, all of them are now off the moonshot)
19:23:44 <nirik> of course more is always nice.
19:24:11 <smooge> I would send all of them to IAD2 but -ENOROOMINRACK
19:24:20 <nirik> right.
19:24:49 <nirik> anyhow, we should find out disk usage needs and go based on that...
19:24:57 <nirik> anything else for meeting?
19:25:08 <nirik> I'm slowly making progress on stuff moving out of cloud.
19:25:16 <smooge> PPC builders to send to IAD2 was my next thing to talk about
19:25:24 <nirik> will try and do maintainer-test this week.
19:25:53 <nirik> well, we need at least 1 power9 box.
19:26:11 <nirik> we should go over the shipping lists
19:26:12 <smooge> i need to get the serial numbers to Shaun RSN
19:26:23 <smooge> so that was my next 'meeting' with you
19:26:30 <smooge> will end this one
19:26:34 <smooge> #endmeeting