18:59:18 #startmeeting Fedora Infrastructure Ops Daily Standup Meeting 18:59:18 Meeting started Tue Feb 25 18:59:18 2020 UTC. 18:59:18 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 18:59:18 The chair is smooge. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:59:18 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 18:59:18 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting' 18:59:18 #chair cverna mboddu nirik relrod smooge 18:59:18 #info meeting is 30 minutes MAX. At the end of 30, its stops 18:59:18 #info agenda is at https://board.net/p/fedora-infra-daily 18:59:18 Current chairs: cverna mboddu nirik relrod smooge 18:59:18 #topic Tickets needing review 18:59:19 #info https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues?status=Open&priority=1 18:59:27 Hello :) 18:59:31 hello 18:59:37 * mboddu is here, but need 5 min 18:59:51 .ticket 8685 18:59:52 nirik: Issue #8685: Errors when attempting to "podman pull" - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8685 19:00:03 I think this is fixed. Can someone confirm and we can close it? 19:00:16 I ll check it 19:00:22 and close it then 19:00:27 ok. 19:00:45 it turned out to be some bug/issue with the cdn. They were supposed to renew it automagically... but it didnt 19:00:57 .ticket 8686 19:00:58 nirik: Issue #8686: new opentracker port opened for respins SIG tracker - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8686 19:01:04 I just need to go do this one. 19:01:28 pagure.issue.edit -- cverna edited the close_status and status fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8685 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8685 19:01:29 pagure.issue.comment.added -- cverna commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8685: "Errors when attempting to "podman pull"" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8685#comment-628736 19:01:44 pagure.issue.tag.added -- smooge tagged ticket fedora-infrastructure#8686: aws https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8686 19:01:45 pagure.issue.edit -- smooge edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8686 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8686 19:02:02 nirik, want me to assign it to you also? 19:02:08 if you like. 19:02:12 .ticket 8687 19:02:14 nirik: Issue #8687: module: bad constraint branch = stream - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8687 19:02:32 I guess this is a epel or a mbs thing? not sure where best to handle it... 19:03:14 waiting on assignee :) 19:03:17 I don't either.. my gut reaction is that it is a releng issue 19:03:39 we can tag it releng :P 19:03:44 but since we are all the same that just makes it us 19:03:45 ok 19:04:00 .ticket 8687 19:04:01 nirik: Issue #8687: module: bad constraint branch = stream - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8687 19:04:03 this one is the same 19:04:06 pagure.issue.tag.added -- smooge tagged ticket fedora-infrastructure#8687: releng https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8687 19:04:07 pagure.issue.edit -- smooge edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8687 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8687 19:04:27 did you mean a different ticket? 19:04:45 sorry, yeah 19:04:57 nevermind. onward. 19:05:01 I am not sure about it either, may be a question to modularity folks 19:05:03 .ticket 8689 19:05:04 nirik: Issue #8689: Badges (tahrir) is currently broken - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8689 19:05:04 pagure.issue.tag.added -- smooge tagged ticket fedora-infrastructure#8690: mbs and releng https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8690 19:05:05 pagure.issue.edit -- smooge edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8690 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8690 19:05:19 I guess this one is... waiting on asignee? 19:05:34 ah, right, 8690 was the one I meant 19:05:34 or waiting on external ? 19:05:37 pagure.issue.tag.added -- smooge tagged ticket fedora-infrastructure#8687: mbs https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8687 19:05:59 pagure.issue.edit -- smooge edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8689 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8689 19:06:19 yeah nirik sorry I saw that it was related and decided to leap ahead on 8690 19:06:21 cverna: sure 19:06:33 so, thats all the needs review 19:06:43 any others we want to talk about? 19:06:51 nirik: I don't really mind it is just that I don't think we will work on it :) 19:06:56 I _really_ hope I can focus on cloud retirement later this afternoon. 19:07:13 my plan is still to turn it off thursday 19:07:19 Yes since we are in freeze are there anything we want to focus on try to achieve during that time ? 19:08:19 catching up on things would be nice. we are back up to 120 tickets. 19:08:23 so all I am focusing on this week is getting some hardware installed enough it can be used for other stuff after freeze 19:08:27 that will get 3 tickets 19:09:24 yes it is difficult to tackle the old tickets ,I think we are doing a good job with incoming stuff 19:09:42 but everything that requires a bit more work is hard to get done :( 19:09:50 yeah. 19:10:50 I guess the fedmsg retirement should quite high in the list of things we want to do 19:10:54 yes. 19:11:02 that would be great to finish. 19:11:10 .ticket 8213 19:11:12 cverna: Issue #8213: fedmsg -> fedora-messaging migration tracker - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8213 19:11:12 however, we need FMN replacement... 19:11:41 what if we dropped FMN 19:11:59 is FMN in Minimal Fedora scope ? 19:12:10 smooge: then no one would ever know whats happening 19:12:14 cverna: yes 19:12:25 * smooge is deep in dealing with https://www.xkcd.com/2259/ today so I am not sure I know what is happening now anyway 19:12:53 nirik: ok then we can't just ditch it :P 19:12:57 no more commit emails, no more notices of builds. no notices if provenpackagers did things to some packages you maintain 19:13:29 I'm hoping we could come up with something a lot simplier. 19:13:35 this is really critical and in a really bad shape 19:13:57 is it running on F27 or something like that ? 19:14:01 yep 19:14:05 f28 I think 19:14:59 might be good to brainstorm a requirements doc up... 19:15:01 ok I think we need to be louder on how critical this is and start to think about a replacement that would be simplier 19:15:05 +1 19:15:15 because it doesn't need to do everything this one does for sure. 19:15:46 yes we need to trim down the features to the bare minimum 19:16:29 perhaps we can ponder on it and do some work on requirements during the weekly meeting? 19:16:56 hi all; do anyone knows how to fix "The PDC branch already exists" 19:17:22 sounds good, I am happy to send an email to the infra list and maybe devel list to raise awareness about the current situation 19:17:30 when fedpkg disagrees ans things no such repo exists? 19:17:38 thinks? 19:17:57 nim: can you create a releng ticket for that with the details 19:18:10 nim: I think releng needs to fix the data in PDC 19:18:11 cverna: +1 19:19:00 cverna, I did, limb is closing the issues because PDC says things are already done 19:19:04 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/22513 19:19:14 nim: no, not there. a releng ticket 19:19:16 (and what the heck is PDC in the first place?) 19:19:25 product definition center 19:19:41 it has a list of every package, branch, compose, whatever... 19:19:52 nirik, ok, I learnt another thing today! 19:20:00 time to warp to pagure 19:20:03 nim: https://pagure.io/releng/issues 19:20:08 cverna++ 19:20:09 nim: Karma for cverna changed to 19 (for the current release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 19:20:12 it's also end of life and dead and we wish we never deployed it. ;) 19:20:14 nirik++ 19:20:21 cverna, +1 also on your emails to devel and infra about FMN 19:20:29 nirik: sounds like most of our infra 19:20:32 :P 19:20:40 nirik, sorry, I'm broke now :) 19:21:00 cverna: it's in the same state as FMN, but we never even wrote it orignally. 19:21:03 anyhow. 19:21:09 our infrastructure is protoypes pushed into production with the goal of replacing it with a better prototype 19:21:11 anything else we want to discuss in our last 9min 19:21:18 not from me 19:21:25 nothing here 19:21:41 #endmeeting