19:00:04 <smooge> #startmeeting Fedora Infrastructure Ops Daily Standup Meeting
19:00:04 <zodbot> Meeting started Wed Mar  4 19:00:04 2020 UTC.
19:00:04 <zodbot> This meeting is logged and archived in a public location.
19:00:04 <zodbot> The chair is smooge. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
19:00:04 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
19:00:04 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting'
19:00:04 <smooge> #chair cverna mboddu nirik relrod smooge
19:00:04 <smooge> #info meeting is 30 minutes MAX. At the end of 30, its stops
19:00:04 <smooge> #info agenda is at https://board.net/p/fedora-infra-daily
19:00:04 <zodbot> Current chairs: cverna mboddu nirik relrod smooge
19:00:04 <smooge> #topic Tickets needing review
19:00:05 <smooge> #info https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues?status=Open&priority=1
19:00:35 <nirik> adamw: too many.
19:00:39 * nirik is here.
19:00:59 <nirik> .ticket 8710
19:01:00 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8710: Error 503 from cdn.registry.fedoraproject.org - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8710
19:01:12 <nirik> I plan to work on this when I next get to work and not be meeting. ;)
19:01:26 <nirik> it's caused by proxy30 we now know
19:01:33 * cverna waives
19:01:48 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.assigned.added -- kevin assigned ticket fedora-infrastructure#8710 to kevin https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8710
19:01:49 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- kevin edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8710 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8710
19:01:57 <nirik> .ticket 8720
19:01:58 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8720: fedorahosted mailing list request for systemroles - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8720
19:02:00 <mboddu> heylo
19:02:01 <cverna> I ll be around for a bit after that meeting nirik, let me know if I can help
19:02:22 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.new -- mattia opened a new ticket fedora-infrastructure#8723: "Need an update of python-review_stats against epel7-infra tag" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8723
19:02:30 <nirik> which meeting? this one?
19:02:44 <nirik> this just needs to be done... 8720... move to waiting on asignee?
19:02:53 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- mattia commented on ticket Fedora-Infra/review_stats#2: "Deploy script" https://pagure.io/Fedora-Infra/review_stats/issue/2#comment-630808
19:02:57 <cverna> nirik: yes this one
19:02:59 <nirik> it's actually just one command on mailman01
19:03:08 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.edited -- mattia edited a comment on ticket Fedora-Infra/review_stats#2: "Deploy script" https://pagure.io/Fedora-Infra/review_stats/issue/2#comment-630808
19:03:18 <nirik> cverna: I am participating in an interview after this... will be another hour before I can look
19:03:21 * mboddu has an update on 8690
19:03:41 <nirik> mboddu: hang on, lets get thru the needs review first
19:03:44 <cverna> nirik: ok then I guess I will be sleeping :P
19:03:57 <mboddu> nirik: Sure, just wanted to bring it up
19:03:59 <nirik> .ticket 8721
19:04:00 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8721: Requesting a new compose box - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8721
19:04:09 <mboddu> Oh thats me
19:04:35 <nirik> we may be able to do this short term, but we have no planned capacity for this during the datacenter move.
19:04:37 <mboddu> smooge said that it has to wait until colo move
19:04:58 <smooge> ok to close this can't fix for the moment?
19:05:09 <smooge> or move it to backlog
19:05:14 <nirik> so yeah, wait until after or we might be able to stand up something now, but it would go away in april or so
19:05:15 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- cverna commented on ticket Fedora-Infra/review_stats#2: "Deploy script" https://pagure.io/Fedora-Infra/review_stats/issue/2#comment-630809
19:05:55 <cverna> I think close can't fix for now
19:05:56 <mboddu> nirik: After f32 release, branched composer doesn't do much, can we take the resources from that a create a new VM?
19:06:12 <smooge> well it isn't going to be at the new location either?
19:06:20 <mboddu> And after the move, add memory to branched composer?
19:06:27 <nirik> mboddu: but there isn't going to be a branched composer then?
19:06:38 <nirik> we are counting on that being off after f32 is out.
19:06:42 <smooge> during the move we will only have what is needed
19:06:57 <mboddu> Ohhh
19:06:58 <smooge> for bare minimal viability
19:07:04 <mboddu> Right
19:07:17 <nirik> there will be a lot less builders a lot less everything... everything will be slower... until we bring things back up
19:07:32 <nirik> doesn't odcs use koji?
19:07:33 <mboddu> Oh well, then, we will just wait, I guess
19:07:44 <cverna> "until we bring things back up" eventually
19:07:48 <cverna> :)
19:07:54 <mboddu> nirik: Nope, it uses odcs-backend01.phx2.fp.o, but it has 4G of memory
19:08:23 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- smooge edited the close_status and status fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8721 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8721
19:08:24 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- smooge commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8721: "Requesting a new compose box" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8721#comment-630810
19:08:37 <cverna> ha that;s good we did not try to use odcs for bodhi backend then
19:09:09 <nirik> well, we may be able to bump it... short term... but yeah
19:09:14 <mboddu> Yeah, I didn't know that it has very less memory or else I would have requested it earlier
19:09:33 <nirik> .ticket 8722
19:09:34 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8722: add wikiedit permissions - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8722
19:09:37 <mboddu> nirik: Short term? How long is it? mid apr?
19:09:52 <nirik> just needs doing I guess. odd that the naming voting is on the wiki?
19:10:19 <nirik> mboddu: yeah, until we have to ship the first round of things out...
19:10:25 <smooge> april 11
19:10:32 <nirik> I can look if there's any memory available there.
19:10:48 <cverna> nirik: yeah that's not great, if we have to add permissions to everyone wanted to vote
19:11:01 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.assigned.added -- smooge assigned ticket fedora-infrastructure#8722 to smooge https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8722
19:11:02 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- smooge edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8722 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8722
19:11:11 <cverna> nirik: maybe we should flag that with the IOT folks
19:11:21 <mboddu> nirik: So, can we get it until apr? So, that we can test our stuff and then we can hold on til the move completes?
19:11:29 * mboddu is sorry for jumping between tickets
19:11:30 <nirik> .ticket 8723
19:11:31 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8723: Need an update of python-review_stats against epel7-infra tag - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8723
19:11:57 <mboddu> Only if there is available memory
19:12:00 <nirik> mboddu: I can look after my meetings... there may be some available memory on that vm we could use until april yes.
19:12:02 <cverna> I think this needs to wait for another build ^^
19:12:16 <mboddu> Thanks nirik
19:12:20 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- kevin edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8720 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8720
19:12:44 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- cverna commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8723: "Need an update of python-review_stats against epel7-infra tag" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8723#comment-630815
19:12:46 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- smooge edited the close_status and status fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8722 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8722
19:12:47 <nirik> yeah, waiting on asignee
19:12:47 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- smooge commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8722: "add wikiedit permissions" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8722#comment-630816
19:13:03 <nirik> ok, thats all needs review. mboddu: you had something?
19:13:10 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- smooge edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8723 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8723
19:13:46 <mboddu> Right
19:14:08 <mboddu> .ticket 8657
19:14:09 <zodbot> mboddu: Issue #8657: `fedpkg module-build` fails with "The modulemd libreoffice.yaml is invalid. Please verify the syntax is correct." upon buildopts: arches: [x86_64] - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8657
19:14:29 <mboddu> I forgot in which meeting we discussed this yesterday
19:14:50 <mboddu> But I didnt know what 'ALLOWED_PRIVILEGED_MODULE_NAMES' does, so I had a chat with mprahl
19:14:51 <smooge> this one
19:15:01 <mboddu> He updated the ticket
19:15:41 <nirik> ah ha.
19:15:45 <nirik> great work mboddu...
19:15:46 <mboddu> To make it work, we have to update libmodulemd on mbs servers and apply the patch that mentioned in the ticket
19:16:18 <nirik> there's also 8445
19:16:22 <nirik> .ticket 8445
19:16:23 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8445: Provide newer versions of python-kerberos and python-requests-kerberos in epel7-infra-stg - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8445
19:16:27 <nirik> that would be good to do at the same time
19:17:05 <nirik> do you want to take these/this on mboddu ? or cverna ?
19:17:42 <mboddu> nirik: Sure, I can take it
19:17:53 <smooge> thanks
19:18:02 <cverna> mboddu++
19:18:14 <smooge> ok where are we ?
19:18:20 <smooge> backlog or releng tickets?
19:18:24 <nirik> any other tickets to discuss?
19:18:26 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.assigned.added -- mohanboddu assigned ticket fedora-infrastructure#8445 to mohanboddu https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8445
19:18:30 <mboddu> Done
19:18:34 <nirik> mboddu: thanks! let me know if you get blocked anywhere
19:18:43 <mboddu> Well, assigned to myself, not the work is done :)
19:18:50 <mboddu> Thanks nirik
19:18:53 <nirik> ha. that was quick! :)
19:19:06 <nirik> mboddu: did you want to do 8445 also? or smooge, you want to keep that one?
19:19:34 <mboddu> I have taken that as well, but smooge can update it as well
19:20:02 * nirik is just thinking smooge has enough on his plate. ;)
19:20:30 <cverna> +1
19:20:43 <nirik> anything else?
19:21:10 <cverna> nothing here
19:21:14 <mboddu> It just needs to be tagged to epel7-infra-candidate tag, that should do it
19:21:39 * mboddu checks releng
19:21:40 <nirik> mboddu: I didn't think there were any epel7 builds of those? but there might be now I guess
19:21:41 <mboddu> Give me a min
19:22:06 <smooge> I thought I gave up 8445
19:22:11 <smooge> sorry yes please take it
19:22:13 <mboddu> nirik: For krb, there are - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8445#comment-615054
19:22:20 <mboddu> For libmodulemd, I dont know
19:22:33 <nirik> ok, will close out then... see everyone tomorrow, same 🦇 time, same 🦇 station
19:22:44 <nirik> ah, ok.
19:22:47 <mboddu> .releng 9293
19:22:48 <zodbot> mboddu: Issue #9293: Fix koji/bodhi in staging - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9293
19:23:04 <nirik> ah yeah.
19:23:04 <mboddu> We need a prod to stg sync for this
19:23:15 <nirik> a sync of koji but also src...
19:23:42 <pingou> last time for koji we didn't sync the db, just re-branched for stg
19:23:43 <nirik> I can do the koji sync sometime... lets discuss in ticket how to do the rest?
19:23:50 <pingou> we also need pdc
19:24:02 <nirik> yeah, this smells like a playbook perhaps?
19:24:16 <mboddu> How long does koji sync takes?
19:24:16 <pingou> if we do pdc, we don't really need src, we can take care of the branch creation client side
19:24:18 * nirik will brb
19:24:20 <pingou> days
19:24:26 <mboddu> Maybe I can create the tags and targets
19:24:35 <nirik> 6 hours ish? I thought
19:24:53 <pingou> I thought last time it was more than that, happy to be wrong
19:25:21 <mboddu> If 6 hours, better start the sync in the night and it will be done by morning
19:25:30 <cverna> last time the koji sync playbook was broken that's why it took a long time
19:25:54 <cverna> migration to new version of koji broken the sql edit the playbook does
19:26:01 <cverna> broke*
19:26:48 <cverna> but I would be +1 to take the time to create playbook for that, so that we can sync everything that needs to be done with a playbook
19:26:59 * nirik has to run
19:27:00 <cverna> so next time it will be easy to do
19:27:14 <cverna> thanks nirik
19:27:35 <mboddu> Thanks nirik
19:27:54 <mboddu> cverna: Yeah, I am happy to help on the playbook part
19:28:04 <pingou> having a playbook to do branching, could also solve that question
19:28:14 <pingou> we would run it stg and prod et voila :)
19:28:20 <mboddu> Maybe we can write the playbook to sync everything, koji, bodhi, pdc, src.fp.o....
19:28:35 <smooge> ok I think we are out of high level standup items
19:28:51 <smooge> I am going to end this and we can continue talking about it afterwords
19:28:56 <smooge> #endmeeting