18:00:09 <nirik> #startmeeting Fedora Infrastructure Ops Daily Standup Meeting
18:00:09 <zodbot> Meeting started Thu Apr 30 18:00:09 2020 UTC.
18:00:09 <zodbot> This meeting is logged and archived in a public location.
18:00:09 <zodbot> The chair is nirik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
18:00:09 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
18:00:09 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting'
18:00:09 <nirik> #chair cverna mboddu nirik smooge
18:00:09 <zodbot> Current chairs: cverna mboddu nirik smooge
18:00:09 <nirik> #meetingname fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting
18:00:09 <nirik> #info meeting is 30 minutes MAX. At the end of 30, its stops
18:00:09 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting'
18:00:10 <nirik> #info agenda is at https://board.net/p/fedora-infra-daily
18:00:11 <nirik> #topic Tickets needing review
18:00:12 <nirik> #info https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues?status=Open&priority=1
18:00:19 <nirik> morning all. lets stand on up
18:00:27 <mboddu> Morning
18:00:33 <nirik> .ticket 8878
18:00:34 <mboddu> If i stand up, I cant type properly
18:00:35 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8878: Koschei missing history - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8878
18:00:40 <mboddu> ;)
18:00:44 <smooge> sorry here
18:00:52 <cverna> o/
18:01:06 <smooge> not sure what to do about that ticket nirik
18:01:09 <amrmzaki> hello all
18:01:36 <nirik> yeah, so koschei does scratch builds and we don't keep them around that long.
18:01:43 <nirik> so I am not sure either.
18:01:54 <nirik> I mean we could keep things longer, but thats more storage
18:02:16 <mboddu> The current gc time is 1 week?
18:02:24 <mboddu> For koschei builds
18:02:29 <nirik> I think it's shorter for koschei
18:02:54 * nirik looks
18:03:23 <nirik> builds are 1 day actually.
18:03:32 <nirik> 0 45 * * * apache find /mnt/koji/scratch/koschei -xdev -depth    -mtime +1  -name "*.rpm" -delete >& /dev/null
18:03:48 <mboddu> Ohhh
18:04:10 <smooge> nirik, do you want me to put this in the data?
18:04:11 <mboddu> Anyway, I dont how to fix it
18:04:28 <smooge> get us a 45 petabytes of storage
18:04:33 <mboddu> Close -> Can't Fix
18:04:56 <nirik> I mean we could increase some perhaps, but it's unclear how much would do any good.
18:05:08 <smooge> well they are wanting something from over 6 months ago
18:05:22 <nirik> so, yeah, I'd say close wontfix, or we could ask how much more time they need/expect/would be useful
18:05:44 <nirik> wait...
18:05:54 <nirik> are they asking for history in the koschei app?
18:06:53 <nirik> re-reading I think thats the case...
18:07:16 <nirik> so, lets close and ask them to refile upstream against koschi? thats only a database, they should be able to have longer history I would think
18:08:16 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- kevin edited the close_status and status fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8878 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8878
18:08:17 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- kevin commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8878: "Koschei missing history" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8878#comment-645290
18:08:28 <nirik> .ticket 8879
18:08:29 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8879: packages web app is in a very poor state - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8879
18:08:40 <nirik> so, I explained the efforts ongoing to fix this.
18:08:53 <nirik> should we consider turning the app off for now though?
18:09:03 <smooge> ooops we nearly colided. I was getting hte url for where they could file it
18:09:43 <smooge> well we will be turning it off in a couple of weeks anyway :P
18:09:54 <smooge> so might as well do it early
18:10:02 <smooge> i dont think it was in mvf
18:10:23 <nirik> 6 weeks...
18:10:49 <cverna> I would wait for the move
18:10:55 <nirik> I'd prefer to wait, because this is 1 complaint about it being out of date/wrong... but if we turn it off we will have 10,000 about it.
18:11:26 <nirik> so what to do about this ticket? close it?
18:11:28 <cverna> hopefully when communishift is back we can look at the static page version
18:12:14 <nirik> sure. I am not sure how far that is along tho
18:12:37 <cverna> yeah :)
18:13:41 <nirik> proposal: close with note that it will likely go down at the dc move... hopefully to be replaced by something better before or after
18:13:53 <smooge> want me to do it?
18:14:00 <nirik> please do
18:14:10 <nirik> .ticket 8880
18:14:11 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8880: Join zodbot to #fedora-ama - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8880
18:14:18 <nirik> nb: did you do this already?
18:14:26 <nb> yes
18:14:34 * nb forgot to close ticket sorry
18:14:41 <nirik> looks so. Cool. Thanks. ;)
18:15:20 <nirik> ok, I had one other item to note...
18:15:26 <nirik> not a ticket, but I can make one...
18:16:12 <nirik> bugzilla admins want us to change our admin user... I made a new fedora-admin-xmlrpc@fp.o user for this. I need to change it in ansible now... just wanted to note in case anyone was using it for anything else
18:16:37 <nirik> any other blockers, reviews, tickets, questions?
18:16:44 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- smooge edited the close_status and status fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8879 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8879
18:16:45 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- smooge commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8879: "packages web app is in a very poor state" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8879#comment-645292
18:16:47 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- nb edited the close_status and status fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8880 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8880
18:16:48 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- nb commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8880: "Join zodbot to #fedora-ama" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8880#comment-645294
18:16:55 * mboddu has couple
18:17:13 <mboddu> .releng 9429
18:17:14 <zodbot> mboddu: Issue #9429: fix empty repos - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9429
18:17:22 <mboddu> Its related to couple of infra tickets
18:17:39 <nirik> yeah, I filed that a bit ago. sorry, meant to mention it.
18:17:40 <mboddu> I think https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9429#comment-645289 might fix it, but I haven't done deep digging
18:17:45 <mboddu> I will check it later
18:17:51 <mboddu> nirik: np :)
18:17:52 <nirik> we keep having to adjust mm each release and we should really try and avoid that. ;)
18:18:01 <mboddu> Yes, understandable
18:18:12 <mboddu> And another thing is
18:18:47 <mboddu> This is not particular to this meeting per say, but...
18:18:54 <mboddu> nirik: Did you get a chance to look at https://paste.centos.org/view/ee67cf00 ?
18:19:01 * mboddu is blocked by it
18:19:10 <nirik> no, whats that from?
18:19:50 <nirik> to make images via odcs?
18:19:52 <mboddu> nirik: Thats from nothing, its in my local diff - ^^ is to fix https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43943458 ?
18:19:57 <mboddu> nirik: Right
18:20:57 <nirik> we need to check nfs export perms... and do we need to mount it on rootroot builders?
18:21:04 <nirik> I think yes
18:21:42 <mboddu> I think so
18:22:22 <nirik> I can do that... sometime. :)
18:22:30 <nirik> can you make a ticket on it to track the work for it?
18:23:25 <mboddu> nirik: Sure, I thought its an easy fix :)
18:24:19 <nirik> needs dealing with the export policy for that volume on the netapp, then making sure all the builders in run root channel also mount that volume rw, just like they do fedora_koji
18:24:39 <nirik> and geeze... fedora_koji is back to 85% full? what the heck?
18:25:32 <mboddu> Okay, I will create a ticket
18:25:36 <mboddu> Thanks nirik
18:25:45 <mboddu> I will look into cleaning some stuff
18:27:18 <nirik> anyone have anything else?
18:28:24 <smooge> i dont
18:29:03 <nirik> ok, back to the fun then... ;)
18:29:07 <nirik> #endmeeting