18:00:21 <nirik> #startmeeting Fedora Infrastructure Ops Daily Standup Meeting 18:00:21 <zodbot> Meeting started Wed Jun 17 18:00:21 2020 UTC. 18:00:21 <zodbot> This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 18:00:21 <zodbot> The chair is nirik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:00:21 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 18:00:21 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting' 18:00:21 <nirik> #chair cverna mboddu nirik smooge 18:00:21 <nirik> #meetingname fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting 18:00:21 <zodbot> Current chairs: cverna mboddu nirik smooge 18:00:21 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting' 18:00:21 <nirik> #info meeting is 30 minutes MAX. At the end of 30, its stops 18:00:22 <nirik> #info agenda is at https://board.net/p/fedora-infra-daily 18:00:23 <nirik> #topic Tickets needing review 18:00:24 <nirik> #info https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues?status=Open&priority=1 18:00:49 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- kevin commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8964: "docs too big to fit on proxies anymore" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8964#comment-658851 18:01:00 <nirik> .ticket 9044 18:01:01 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #9044: User is not receiving emails after Jun 12 - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9044 18:01:04 <smooge> I will edit 18:01:32 <nirik> med gain/trouble, groomed ? 18:01:35 <cverna> hello 18:01:44 <nirik> I dont know the status, but sounds like smooge was working on it? 18:01:47 <smooge> this one has been my other headache tomorrow 18:01:49 <smooge> today 18:02:00 <smooge> sorry was just getting off chat on it 18:02:03 <smooge> it should be fixed 18:02:09 <cverna> :( sounds like high trouble high gain 18:02:14 * mboddu is here 18:02:50 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.tag.added -- smooge tagged ticket fedora-infrastructure#9044: groomed, high-gain, and high-trouble https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9044 18:02:51 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.assigned.added -- smooge assigned ticket fedora-infrastructure#9044 to smooge https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9044 18:02:52 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- smooge edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#9044 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9044 18:02:53 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- smooge commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#9044: "User is not receiving emails after Jun 12" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9044#comment-658852 18:03:34 <nirik> cool! closed/done ticket is the best ticket 18:03:42 <smooge> well at least the routing issue should be gone.. whether email is delivered to aliases.. I do not know 18:03:46 <cverna> +1 18:03:49 <nirik> thats it for needs-info on infra. Anything on releng or other ones we want to discuss? 18:04:26 <mboddu> Yes 18:04:26 <cverna> if we have time we can discuss the osbs ticket 18:04:33 <cverna> I just spent 10 minutes trying things 18:04:50 <mboddu> .releng 9534 18:04:51 <zodbot> mboddu: Issue #9534: ELN bulds are (sometimes?) not signed. - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9534 18:04:51 <nirik> cverna: sure, how about we finish meeting and then look? 18:05:05 <cverna> nirik: works for me :) 18:05:17 <mboddu> I made the PR on which nirik commented and I updated the PR - https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/138 18:05:18 <nirik> mboddu: so, I added a comment on your pr. ;) hopefully it makes sense... but I can expand on it otherwise. 18:05:31 <mboddu> nirik: ^^ :) 18:05:50 <nirik> cool. +1 to merge and run playbooks. 18:06:01 <mboddu> Okay 18:06:19 * nirik is trying to default to 'you submmited the pr, you should merge and run playbooks' 18:06:52 <mboddu> nirik: I would suggest a change in that statement 18:07:08 <mboddu> If its not merged in 1 day, they are waiting on someone else to review it 18:07:36 <mboddu> I make changes and merges if I know what I am doing, but sometimes I wait for someone knowledgeable to review them 18:07:57 <nirik> no no, review is good. I like waiting for review. 18:08:17 <nirik> I just meant that at the end when the reviewer is happy, it should be the submitter that runs the playbooks... 18:08:23 <mboddu> Ah okay 18:08:29 <mboddu> Then I agree with your statement 18:08:33 <nirik> because they know what the change is/where it is/what to watch for/and they wanted it to be changed... 18:08:40 <mboddu> Right 18:08:59 <nirik> and saves a back and forth of 'do you want to run it? should I run it?' 18:09:02 <mboddu> Thats all I got from releng, couple of change request tickets which doesn't require work 18:09:05 <nirik> anyhow, anything else for the meeting? 18:09:13 <mboddu> But I got 1 more thing 18:09:32 <mboddu> cverna: Bodhi updates? Can I try and resume them? I am not seeing anything going on 18:10:07 <mboddu> Not technically related to the meeting 18:10:11 <cverna> yeah please go ahead 18:10:14 <mboddu> But I just thought I should ask 18:10:21 <mboddu> cverna: Okay, thanks 18:10:24 <mboddu> Thats all I got 18:10:45 <nirik> we really need to get bodhi and rawhide messages flowing so we don't need to manually sign ostrees. ;( 18:11:15 <mboddu> Agreed 18:11:17 <cverna> rawhide should be fixed now 18:11:24 <nirik> cverna: oh? 18:11:25 <cverna> rawhide in bodhi* 18:11:39 <nirik> oh that... yeah, but I meant pungi for the rawhide composes. 18:11:42 <mboddu> cverna: rawhide as in rawhide composes 18:11:57 <cverna> yeah I realize that after pressing enter :P 18:12:00 <nirik> there's a PR pingou made. We should make a pungi with it applied in infra 18:12:10 <nirik> anyhow, thanks for coming everyone. 18:12:13 <nirik> #endmeeting