18:00:06 <nirik> #startmeeting Fedora Infrastructure Ops Daily Standup Meeting
18:00:06 <zodbot> Meeting started Tue Sep 15 18:00:06 2020 UTC.
18:00:06 <zodbot> This meeting is logged and archived in a public location.
18:00:06 <zodbot> The chair is nirik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
18:00:06 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
18:00:06 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting'
18:00:06 <nirik> #chair mboddu nirik smooge pingou mobrien
18:00:06 <nirik> #meetingname fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting
18:00:06 <nirik> #info meeting is 30 minutes MAX. At the end of 30, its stops
18:00:06 <zodbot> Current chairs: mboddu mobrien nirik pingou smooge
18:00:06 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting'
18:00:07 <nirik> #info agenda is at https://board.net/p/fedora-infra-daily
18:00:08 <nirik> #topic Tickets needing review
18:00:10 <nirik> #info https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues?status=Open&priority=1
18:00:20 <mboddu> .hello mohanboddu
18:00:21 <zodbot> mboddu: mohanboddu 'Mohan Boddu' <mboddu@bhujji.com>
18:00:37 <nirik> hey mboddu.
18:00:52 <nirik> you want to mod tickets today? or want to run the tickets and I can mod them?
18:01:05 <mboddu> I can modify the tickets
18:01:12 <nirik> ok, thanks
18:01:18 <nirik> .ticket 9320
18:01:19 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #9320: Fedora 33 update cannot be pushed to stable, fails with some kind of server timeout - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9320
18:01:35 <nirik> I think this sounds like another issue we had with a side tag update...
18:01:50 <nirik> and we had to use the cli to deal with it, the web interface wouldn't work
18:02:06 <mboddu> Yeah, I think so
18:02:15 <mboddu> For now, low,low,ops?
18:02:16 <nirik> anyhow, med/med/ops ?
18:02:24 <nirik> sure, either way
18:02:30 <mboddu> But the actual fix should be med/med/ops
18:02:38 <mboddu> Just to run the cli, I think it should be low
18:02:50 <nirik> well, ideally the fix would be a dev thing to fix the bodhi web interface. ;)
18:02:58 <mboddu> Right
18:03:16 <nirik> might mention there for them to try the cli
18:03:16 <mboddu> nirik: Well, '408 Request Time-out' when I tried to login :D
18:03:19 * mboddu trying again
18:03:24 <nirik> to bodhi?
18:03:41 <mboddu> Yup
18:04:00 <nirik> huh, let me check fas...
18:04:01 <mboddu> nirik: It worked now, just might be a fluke
18:05:08 <nirik> it's up, seems ok... odd.
18:05:23 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.tag.added -- mohanboddu tagged ticket fedora-infrastructure#9320: low-gain, low-trouble, and ops https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9320
18:05:24 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- mohanboddu commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#9320: "Fedora 33 update cannot be pushed to stable, fails with some kind of server timeout" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9320#comment-685836
18:05:40 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.edited -- mohanboddu edited a comment on ticket fedora-infrastructure#9320: "Fedora 33 update cannot be pushed to stable, fails with some kind of server timeout" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9320#comment-685836
18:05:56 <nirik> .ticket 9321
18:05:57 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #9321: New proxy host in Sao Paulo - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9321
18:06:16 <nirik> mobrien filed this one. I guess med/med/ops?
18:06:39 <mboddu> +1
18:06:45 <nirik> I guess I can just do it now...
18:06:53 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.tag.added -- mohanboddu tagged ticket fedora-infrastructure#9321: medium-gain, medium-trouble, and ops https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9321
18:06:54 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- mohanboddu edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#9321 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9321
18:07:03 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- mohanboddu edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#9320 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9320
18:07:36 <mobrien1> I would say low/med would even do it
18:10:50 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- kevin edited the close_status and status fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#9321 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9321
18:10:51 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.tag.removed -- kevin removed the medium-gain, medium-trouble, and ops tags from ticket fedora-infrastructure#9321 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9321
18:10:52 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- kevin edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#9321 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9321
18:10:53 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- kevin commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#9321: "New proxy host in Sao Paulo" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9321#comment-685840
18:11:12 <nirik> .ticket 9322
18:11:13 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #9322: EPEL8: no package.cfg in new branches - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9322
18:11:28 <mobrien> thanks nirik
18:11:32 <nirik> we keeping this open to track?
18:11:35 <mboddu> nirik: We already discussed it, its med,med,dev
18:11:35 <mobrien> nirik++
18:11:39 <mboddu> nirik: yup
18:11:40 <nirik> mobrien: no problem, let me know if there's anything wrong with it.
18:12:09 <nirik> .ticket 9323
18:12:10 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #9323: Request for OISF COPR group - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9323
18:12:28 <nirik> we could do this one right now too... I can, or would someone else like to? :)
18:12:41 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.tag.added -- mohanboddu tagged ticket fedora-infrastructure#9322: dev, medium-gain, and medium-trouble https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9322
18:12:42 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.assigned.added -- mohanboddu assigned ticket fedora-infrastructure#9322 to humaton https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9322
18:12:43 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- mohanboddu edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#9322 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9322
18:13:28 <mboddu> nirik: I dont know how to do this
18:13:35 <mboddu> Is there a doc?
18:13:42 <nirik> might be, but it's pretty easy.
18:13:44 <nirik> login to fas.
18:13:51 <nirik> click 'new group' on the left.
18:14:07 <nirik> all lower case entr the group name and the requestor as admin
18:14:31 <mboddu> Oh cool, let me try that
18:14:58 <nirik> I think anyone in sysadmin can make new groups...
18:16:19 * mboddu trying to find what oisf means for display name
18:16:30 <nirik> I'd just put oisf there too
18:16:42 <nirik> (they can edit all this except the name of the group later)
18:17:41 <mboddu> Done
18:18:28 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- mohanboddu edited the close_status and status fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#9323 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9323
18:18:29 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.tag.added -- mohanboddu tagged ticket fedora-infrastructure#9323: low-gain, low-trouble, and ops https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9323
18:18:30 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- mohanboddu edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#9323 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9323
18:18:31 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- mohanboddu edited the close_status and status fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#9323 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9323
18:18:32 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- mohanboddu commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#9323: "Request for OISF COPR group" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9323#comment-685843
18:18:33 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- mohanboddu commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#9323: "Request for OISF COPR group" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9323#comment-685844
18:19:15 <nirik> thats it for infra.
18:19:17 <nirik> anything on releng?
18:19:57 <mboddu> Yes
18:20:03 <mboddu> .releng 9754
18:20:04 <zodbot> mboddu: Issue #9754: Unretire rpms/python-pykmip - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9754
18:20:10 <mboddu> low,low,ops?
18:20:28 <nirik> +1
18:22:05 <mboddu> .releng 9755
18:22:06 <zodbot> mboddu: Issue #9755: Remove golang-github-haproxytech-config-parser-3.0.0~rc1-1.fc34 from rawhide and revert to golang-github-haproxytech-config-parser-2.0.5-1.fc34 - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9755
18:22:25 <mboddu> I need to check if that build was shipped in last compose or not which is just completed
18:22:30 <nirik> yeah...
18:22:30 <mboddu> But, low,low,ops
18:22:33 <nirik> ack
18:22:58 <mboddu> On that note, I have something on rawhide compose
18:23:19 <mboddu> So, I untagged new systemd to get the compose, the problem was in mock which got built couple of hours ago
18:23:47 <nirik> ha. happens.
18:23:55 <mboddu> But that is built on python3.9
18:24:17 <nirik> yeah...
18:24:35 <nirik> so I guess tag the systemd back now?
18:25:37 <mboddu> Yeah, that should work, but https://pagure.io/releng/failed-composes/issue/1761#comment-685833 confused me
18:26:04 <mboddu> Did I miss anything?
18:26:35 * nirik hasn't been following, let me look
18:28:19 <nirik> yeah, I think the mock build should fix it.
18:28:44 <mboddu> Okay, I will tag systemd back and rerun the compose
18:29:00 <mboddu> Thats all I got
18:29:20 <nirik> I don't understand why 3.9 matters here... but perhaps I missed something too?
18:29:55 <mboddu> No idea, which is why I brought it up here
18:29:56 <mboddu> :)
18:31:03 <mboddu> nirik: Thats all I got
18:31:08 <nirik> ok.
18:31:12 <nirik> #endmeeting