18:00:06 #startmeeting Fedora Infrastructure Ops Daily Standup Meeting 18:00:06 Meeting started Tue Sep 15 18:00:06 2020 UTC. 18:00:06 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 18:00:06 The chair is nirik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:00:06 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 18:00:06 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting' 18:00:06 #chair mboddu nirik smooge pingou mobrien 18:00:06 #meetingname fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting 18:00:06 #info meeting is 30 minutes MAX. At the end of 30, its stops 18:00:06 Current chairs: mboddu mobrien nirik pingou smooge 18:00:06 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting' 18:00:07 #info agenda is at https://board.net/p/fedora-infra-daily 18:00:08 #topic Tickets needing review 18:00:10 #info https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues?status=Open&priority=1 18:00:20 .hello mohanboddu 18:00:21 mboddu: mohanboddu 'Mohan Boddu' 18:00:37 hey mboddu. 18:00:52 you want to mod tickets today? or want to run the tickets and I can mod them? 18:01:05 I can modify the tickets 18:01:12 ok, thanks 18:01:18 .ticket 9320 18:01:19 nirik: Issue #9320: Fedora 33 update cannot be pushed to stable, fails with some kind of server timeout - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9320 18:01:35 I think this sounds like another issue we had with a side tag update... 18:01:50 and we had to use the cli to deal with it, the web interface wouldn't work 18:02:06 Yeah, I think so 18:02:15 For now, low,low,ops? 18:02:16 anyhow, med/med/ops ? 18:02:24 sure, either way 18:02:30 But the actual fix should be med/med/ops 18:02:38 Just to run the cli, I think it should be low 18:02:50 well, ideally the fix would be a dev thing to fix the bodhi web interface. ;) 18:02:58 Right 18:03:16 might mention there for them to try the cli 18:03:16 nirik: Well, '408 Request Time-out' when I tried to login :D 18:03:19 * mboddu trying again 18:03:24 to bodhi? 18:03:41 Yup 18:04:00 huh, let me check fas... 18:04:01 nirik: It worked now, just might be a fluke 18:05:08 it's up, seems ok... odd. 18:05:23 pagure.issue.tag.added -- mohanboddu tagged ticket fedora-infrastructure#9320: low-gain, low-trouble, and ops https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9320 18:05:24 pagure.issue.comment.added -- mohanboddu commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#9320: "Fedora 33 update cannot be pushed to stable, fails with some kind of server timeout" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9320#comment-685836 18:05:40 pagure.issue.comment.edited -- mohanboddu edited a comment on ticket fedora-infrastructure#9320: "Fedora 33 update cannot be pushed to stable, fails with some kind of server timeout" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9320#comment-685836 18:05:56 .ticket 9321 18:05:57 nirik: Issue #9321: New proxy host in Sao Paulo - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9321 18:06:16 mobrien filed this one. I guess med/med/ops? 18:06:39 +1 18:06:45 I guess I can just do it now... 18:06:53 pagure.issue.tag.added -- mohanboddu tagged ticket fedora-infrastructure#9321: medium-gain, medium-trouble, and ops https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9321 18:06:54 pagure.issue.edit -- mohanboddu edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#9321 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9321 18:07:03 pagure.issue.edit -- mohanboddu edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#9320 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9320 18:07:36 I would say low/med would even do it 18:10:50 pagure.issue.edit -- kevin edited the close_status and status fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#9321 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9321 18:10:51 pagure.issue.tag.removed -- kevin removed the medium-gain, medium-trouble, and ops tags from ticket fedora-infrastructure#9321 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9321 18:10:52 pagure.issue.edit -- kevin edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#9321 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9321 18:10:53 pagure.issue.comment.added -- kevin commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#9321: "New proxy host in Sao Paulo" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9321#comment-685840 18:11:12 .ticket 9322 18:11:13 nirik: Issue #9322: EPEL8: no package.cfg in new branches - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9322 18:11:28 thanks nirik 18:11:32 we keeping this open to track? 18:11:35 nirik: We already discussed it, its med,med,dev 18:11:35 nirik++ 18:11:39 nirik: yup 18:11:40 mobrien: no problem, let me know if there's anything wrong with it. 18:12:09 .ticket 9323 18:12:10 nirik: Issue #9323: Request for OISF COPR group - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9323 18:12:28 we could do this one right now too... I can, or would someone else like to? :) 18:12:41 pagure.issue.tag.added -- mohanboddu tagged ticket fedora-infrastructure#9322: dev, medium-gain, and medium-trouble https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9322 18:12:42 pagure.issue.assigned.added -- mohanboddu assigned ticket fedora-infrastructure#9322 to humaton https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9322 18:12:43 pagure.issue.edit -- mohanboddu edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#9322 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9322 18:13:28 nirik: I dont know how to do this 18:13:35 Is there a doc? 18:13:42 might be, but it's pretty easy. 18:13:44 login to fas. 18:13:51 click 'new group' on the left. 18:14:07 all lower case entr the group name and the requestor as admin 18:14:31 Oh cool, let me try that 18:14:58 I think anyone in sysadmin can make new groups... 18:16:19 * mboddu trying to find what oisf means for display name 18:16:30 I'd just put oisf there too 18:16:42 (they can edit all this except the name of the group later) 18:17:41 Done 18:18:28 pagure.issue.edit -- mohanboddu edited the close_status and status fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#9323 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9323 18:18:29 pagure.issue.tag.added -- mohanboddu tagged ticket fedora-infrastructure#9323: low-gain, low-trouble, and ops https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9323 18:18:30 pagure.issue.edit -- mohanboddu edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#9323 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9323 18:18:31 pagure.issue.edit -- mohanboddu edited the close_status and status fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#9323 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9323 18:18:32 pagure.issue.comment.added -- mohanboddu commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#9323: "Request for OISF COPR group" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9323#comment-685843 18:18:33 pagure.issue.comment.added -- mohanboddu commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#9323: "Request for OISF COPR group" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9323#comment-685844 18:19:15 thats it for infra. 18:19:17 anything on releng? 18:19:57 Yes 18:20:03 .releng 9754 18:20:04 mboddu: Issue #9754: Unretire rpms/python-pykmip - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9754 18:20:10 low,low,ops? 18:20:28 +1 18:22:05 .releng 9755 18:22:06 mboddu: Issue #9755: Remove golang-github-haproxytech-config-parser-3.0.0~rc1-1.fc34 from rawhide and revert to golang-github-haproxytech-config-parser-2.0.5-1.fc34 - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9755 18:22:25 I need to check if that build was shipped in last compose or not which is just completed 18:22:30 yeah... 18:22:30 But, low,low,ops 18:22:33 ack 18:22:58 On that note, I have something on rawhide compose 18:23:19 So, I untagged new systemd to get the compose, the problem was in mock which got built couple of hours ago 18:23:47 ha. happens. 18:23:55 But that is built on python3.9 18:24:17 yeah... 18:24:35 so I guess tag the systemd back now? 18:25:37 Yeah, that should work, but https://pagure.io/releng/failed-composes/issue/1761#comment-685833 confused me 18:26:04 Did I miss anything? 18:26:35 * nirik hasn't been following, let me look 18:28:19 yeah, I think the mock build should fix it. 18:28:44 Okay, I will tag systemd back and rerun the compose 18:29:00 Thats all I got 18:29:20 I don't understand why 3.9 matters here... but perhaps I missed something too? 18:29:55 No idea, which is why I brought it up here 18:29:56 :) 18:31:03 nirik: Thats all I got 18:31:08 ok. 18:31:12 #endmeeting