18:00:00 <nirik> #startmeeting Fedora Infrastructure Ops Daily Standup Meeting 18:00:00 <zodbot> Meeting started Thu Oct 8 18:00:00 2020 UTC. 18:00:00 <zodbot> This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 18:00:00 <zodbot> The chair is nirik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:00:00 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 18:00:00 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting' 18:00:00 <nirik> #chair mboddu nirik smooge pingou mobrien 18:00:00 <zodbot> Current chairs: mboddu mobrien nirik pingou smooge 18:00:00 <nirik> #meetingname fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting 18:00:00 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting' 18:00:00 <nirik> #info meeting is 30 minutes MAX. At the end of 30, its stops 18:00:01 <nirik> #info agenda is at https://board.net/p/fedora-infra-daily 18:00:03 <nirik> #topic Tickets needing review 18:00:05 <nirik> #info https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues?status=Open&priority=1 18:00:12 <smooge> here 18:00:19 * mboddu is here 18:00:45 <nirik> no needs review infra ones... anything on releng side? 18:01:03 <mboddu> Yup 18:01:32 <mboddu> .releng 9796 18:01:33 <zodbot> mboddu: Issue #9796: Unretire rpms/libhugetlbfs - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9796 18:01:39 <mboddu> low/low/ops? 18:01:44 <nirik> ack 18:02:06 <mboddu> .releng 9799 18:02:07 <zodbot> mboddu: Issue #9799: Create epel8 branch for perl-Data-GUID - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9799 18:02:24 <mboddu> I dont know if they have requested the branch 18:02:41 <mboddu> Maybe, low/low/ops? 18:02:56 <nirik> ack. 18:02:59 <smooge> ack 18:03:36 <mboddu> .releng 9800 18:03:37 <zodbot> mboddu: Issue #9800: Retire/Block manuale in dist-git master and f33 - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9800 18:04:01 <mboddu> low/low/ops 18:04:04 <nirik> also ack 18:04:07 <mboddu> Just need to run fedpkg retire 18:04:30 <mboddu> Thats all I got 18:04:46 * pingou arrives 18:04:49 <nirik> cool. Thanks. you want to mod those, or want smooge or I to? 18:04:58 <nirik> hey pingou 18:05:03 <smooge> any old tickets we want to skim and put out of their misery^w^w^w^w close for lack of progress 18:05:14 <nirik> yes 18:05:21 <nirik> so pingou wanted us to look at these: 18:05:23 <mboddu> I already did that 18:05:24 <nirik> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/report/Meetings%20ticket 18:05:33 <nirik> .ticket 8218 18:05:34 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8218: non-critical fedora coreos apps in communishift - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8218 18:06:00 <pingou> mboddu: on the perl paclage, they did request the branch but they are only at the collaborator level 18:06:05 <pingou> so the tool turned them down 18:06:25 <pingou> (and I've had to give them collaborator level because ralph was being uncooperative) 18:06:35 <nirik> so, yeah, I guess we could close this until communishift comes back? we have several other communishift ones also... 18:06:39 <mboddu> pingou: Okay 18:06:45 <pingou> nirik: +1 18:07:07 <smooge> I am ok with closing them. I really don't think we are going to have a communishift and it feels like holding out false hope 18:07:08 <nirik> .ticket 8823 18:07:09 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8823: Application for communishift access - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8823 18:07:15 <nirik> .ticket 8761 18:07:16 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8761: Communishift error in a fresh project - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8761 18:07:23 <nirik> .ticket 8748 18:07:24 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8748: Migrate Fedora Project communishift to new datacenter - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8748 18:08:06 <pingou> and if it comes back the way we hope, things will likely be different 18:08:08 <nirik> yeah. I can ping on it again and see if there's any progress on anything 18:08:13 <pingou> so these tickets will likely no longer apply 18:08:21 <smooge> agreed with pingou 18:08:44 <nirik> right, I can close them after the meeting then... politely. Unless someone else wants to... 18:08:56 <smooge> I can close them now.. oh wait politely 18:09:01 <pingou> ^^ 18:09:14 <pingou> nirik: I can do it in the morning if you don't get to them 18:09:20 <nirik> .ticket 8248 18:09:21 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8248: MTS is now running in prod in dry_run mode - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8248 18:09:42 <pingou> I've pinged on this a few times now, w/o any responses 18:09:55 <pingou> and I'm unclear what the task is 18:09:55 <nirik> so, yeah. 18:10:06 <nirik> This is a thing/app that can tag modules. 18:10:12 <nirik> The modularity folks wanted it for something. 18:10:21 <nirik> I think we should try and see if it's still wanted. 18:10:39 <pingou> who can answer that question now? 18:10:47 <smooge> At this time we are unable to move forward with setting up an OpenShift cluster to be used for these projects. It is unclear how long in the future it may be so we are closing this ticket versus holding it open indefinitely. We apologize for this inconvenience. 18:10:56 <nirik> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8176 18:11:14 <pingou> smooge: potentially link to Aoife's email on devel-announce for more context/information? 18:11:24 <nirik> smooge: I was going to add that there are legal concerns that need to be addressed, and link to more info... 18:12:05 <pingou> nirik: Lucas from that releng ticket commented on the infra one as well 18:12:11 <pingou> .seen cqi 18:12:11 <zodbot> pingou: I have not seen cqi. 18:12:35 * pingou hasn't heard of cqi in a while 18:12:45 <nirik> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7563 18:12:50 <nirik> thats the rfr 18:12:58 <nirik> perhaps sgallagh might know more? 18:13:13 <smooge> Please see https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Q74QYG54MNBCY7UX2GITPAZYKHD6BYFH/ for more information 18:13:46 <sgallagh> What did I do now? 18:13:53 <nirik> smooge: yes, thats the post. 18:14:09 <pingou> sgallagh: we're looking at: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8248 18:14:24 <nirik> sgallagh: we are trying to determine if MTS is something we want to finish deploying or if it's not wanted/needed anymore right now 18:14:28 <pingou> and wondering what the ask is and/or what the status of MTS is 18:14:54 <nirik> and sorry, thats message tagging service... 18:14:55 * pingou adds MTS to the applications list 18:15:05 <sgallagh> To be honest, I thought MTS was deployed two years ago. 18:15:14 <sgallagh> contyk was the point-person on that, so I'd defer to him 18:15:24 <pingou> according to the title of this ticket, it's in dry_run mode 18:16:01 <sgallagh> I honestly have no idea what the status is on that 18:16:35 <nirik> proposal: ping contyk in ticket and ask for feedback? 18:16:55 <pingou> .fasinfo contyk 18:16:56 <zodbot> pingou: User "contyk" doesn't exist 18:16:59 <pingou> .fas contyk 18:17:00 <zodbot> pingou: psabata 'Petr Šabata' <psabata@redhat.com> 18:17:15 <pingou> I'm going to ping vmaljulin as well 18:17:40 <nirik> sounds good. 18:17:42 <fm-admin_> pagure.issue.comment.added -- pingou commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8248: "MTS is now running in prod in dry_run mode" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8248#comment-694705 18:17:46 <nirik> if we don't hear back in a bit we can close 18:17:50 * contyk looks 18:18:01 <mboddu> There is a releng ticket as well and I think I closed it 18:18:03 * mboddu searches 18:18:13 <pingou> I was going to say: let's leave it as "Next Meeting" and we can see next week 18:18:22 <nirik> pingou: sure! 18:18:25 <nirik> hey contyk! 18:18:33 <pingou> mboddu: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8176 ? 18:18:45 <pingou> ( nirik shared that one earlier) 18:18:49 <mboddu> pingou: Yes, thats the one 18:19:06 <nirik> .ticket 8390 18:19:07 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8390: Create custom git refs to archive deprecated branches in dist-git - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8390 18:19:07 <mboddu> Oh, sorry, I missed it 18:19:30 <pingou> for that one, we need to check if we can push to refs/archives/* 18:19:40 <pingou> (I'm pretty sure we cannot, but worth checking) 18:20:00 <nirik> I am not entirely sure what problem this is solving and if it's worth it. 18:20:18 <pingou> the past branches no longer show in the list of branches 18:20:29 <pingou> they will be harder to get to 18:20:29 <fm-admin_> pagure.issue.comment.added -- psabata commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8248: "MTS is now running in prod in dry_run mode" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8248#comment-694711 18:20:43 <nirik> but... what problem does that cause? 18:20:55 <pingou> no idea :) 18:21:02 <pingou> a long list of branches for old packages? 18:21:28 <pingou> "The issue of dist-git having "too many branches" regularly appears on mailing lists and in offline conversations." 18:21:28 <nirik> don't run git branch -a then? 18:21:49 <nirik> yeah, I just am not sure why... 18:21:56 <nirik> perhaps I once knew when this ticket was new 18:22:02 <pingou> I'm more than happy to close the ticket 18:22:31 <pingou> I flagged it in a: do we want to do it or close it? kind of way 18:23:08 * nirik re-reads 18:23:20 <nirik> ok, I see. 18:23:27 <nirik> it's due to stream branches. 18:23:40 <nirik> "However, it used to be clear which branches 18:23:40 <nirik> are maintained. Nobody can tell now." 18:23:45 <fm-admin_> pagure.issue.edit -- pingou edited the content fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8248 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8248 18:24:03 <nirik> but can we tell that via pagure/dist-git? 18:24:11 <pingou> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/poetry/branches?branchname=master retired branches are greyed out 18:24:22 <pingou> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R/branches?branchname=master 18:24:47 <nirik> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nodejs/branches?branchname=master 18:24:49 <nirik> was the example 18:25:17 <nirik> the greyed out is a bit subtle 18:26:05 <fm-admin_> pagure.issue.comment.added -- pingou commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8248: "MTS is now running in prod in dry_run mode" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8248#comment-694718 18:26:20 * dustymabe waves at nirik - when you get a second jlebon and I would like you to invalidate the cloudfront cache on a particular entry for us 18:26:26 <nirik> anyhow, I think we could solve this via tools. 18:26:49 <pingou> nirik: do we want to make the grey lighter? 18:26:59 <pingou> or strikethrough? 18:27:07 <nirik> or splt it into two lists? 18:27:13 <nirik> active / inactive? 18:27:22 <pingou> that'll be a bit of JS but sure 18:27:26 <nirik> or 'open' closed? 18:27:42 <pingou> active/inactive sounds good to me 18:27:51 <nirik> I think that would be more clear... 18:28:01 <nirik> so lets propose that on the ticket and see if it addresses this? 18:28:06 <pingou> wfm 18:28:13 <nirik> you got it, or want me to? 18:28:22 <pingou> go for it 18:28:51 <nirik> ok, can do 18:28:59 <nirik> just a min left, shall we try the last one? 18:29:06 <nirik> .ticket 9048 18:29:07 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #9048: Set sidetag_debuginfo_allowed/sidetag_rpm_macros_allowed on fXX-build - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9048 18:29:27 <pingou> do/don't? :) 18:29:35 <nirik> perhaps this is something we could ask koji developers about... 18:29:58 <nirik> or... actually... could we do this in bodhi? 18:30:47 <nirik> ie, allow this, but make bodhi not merge back sidetags where the macros have been changed. 18:30:55 <nirik> ie, those are only useful for experements. 18:31:43 <pingou> how would we know? 18:31:58 <nirik> might be in history of the tag? I can check that... 18:32:01 <nirik> and we are out of time... 18:32:17 <nirik> #endmeeting