#fedora-blocker-review: f19final-blocker-review-1.1
Meeting started by tflink at 16:02:30 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- Roll Call (tflink, 16:02:30)
- Introduction (tflink, 16:21:13)
- Our purpose in this meeting is to review
proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept
them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted
blocker and freeze exception bugs. (tflink,
16:21:20)
- We'll be following the process outlined
at: (tflink,
16:21:28)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
(tflink,
16:21:28)
- The bugs up for review today are available
at: (tflink,
16:21:34)
- http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current
(tflink,
16:21:34)
- The criteria for release blocking bugs can be
found at: (tflink,
16:21:41)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Final_Release_Criteria
(tflink,
16:21:41)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Beta_Release_Criteria
(tflink,
16:21:44)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Alpha_Release_Criteria
(tflink,
16:21:47)
- Up for review today, we have: (tflink,
16:21:50)
- 11 Proposed Blockers (tflink,
16:21:57)
- 4 Accepted Blockers (tflink,
16:21:57)
- 11 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (tflink,
16:21:57)
- 7 Accepted Freeze Exceptions (tflink,
16:21:57)
- (965865) ValueError: ('invalid size specification', '-880.000000 MB') (tflink, 16:23:07)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965865
(tflink,
16:23:10)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink,
16:23:13)
- AGREED: 965865 - The
cause of this is still very unclear, will revisit at a later
meeting (tflink,
16:30:09)
- (967527) /root/anaconda-ks.cfg crashes anaconda (tflink, 16:30:44)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967527
(tflink,
16:30:44)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink,
16:30:44)
- http://www.happyassassin.net/ks/967527.ks
(adamw,
16:49:03)
- AGREED: 967527 - some
people can reproduce the behavior, others are not able to. will
split this bug into two for the different issues and will revisit
after dev input (tflink,
16:56:36)
- (968915) Anaconda locks user account instead of creating it password-less (tflink, 16:56:50)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968915
(tflink,
16:56:53)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink,
16:56:56)
- AGREED: 968915 -
AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F19 alpha release criterion
for installs with a passwordless user created during install: "After
firstboot is completed and on subsequent boots, a graphical install
must boot to a log in screen where it is possible to log in to a
working desktop as the user created during firstboot." (tflink,
17:01:06)
- (968951) User data from first boot are copied to new users (tflink, 17:01:21)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968951
(tflink,
17:01:21)
- Proposed Blocker, gnome-initial-setup,
NEW (tflink,
17:01:21)
- AGREED: 968951 -
AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F19 final release criterion
when creating a second user right after running gnome-initial-setup
for an admin user: "The release must contain no known security bugs
of 'important' or higher impact according to the Red Hat severity
classification scale which cannot be satisfactorily resolved by a
package update (e.g. issues during installation)" (tflink,
17:11:59)
- (919855) [abrt] gnome-settings-daemon-3.7.91-1.fc19: getenv: Process /usr/libexec/gnome-settings-daemon was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV) (tflink, 17:12:17)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919855
(tflink,
17:12:20)
- Proposed Blocker, gnome-settings-daemon,
NEW (tflink,
17:12:22)
- AGREED: 919855 -
While this seems like it has blocker potential, it isn't a clear
criteria violation and it would be better to have more than 3 people
voting to take it as a blocker. Will revisit at the next review
meeting (tflink,
17:25:52)
- (968936) SIGSEGV of packagekit-offline-update.service during update (tflink, 17:26:07)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968936
(tflink,
17:26:10)
- Proposed Blocker, PackageKit, NEW (tflink,
17:26:12)
- AGREED: 968936 -
AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F19 alpha release criteria
for gnome's offline updates: "The installed system must be able to
download and install updates with yum and with the default graphical
package manager in all release-blocking desktops" (tflink,
17:41:46)
- (968794) KDE keyboard input impossible with ibus enabled and qt updated to 4.8.4-18 (tflink, 17:41:55)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968794
(tflink,
17:41:58)
- Proposed Blocker, qt, NEW (tflink,
17:42:01)
- AGREED: 968794 -
AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F19 final criterion for
users who rely on ibus input on KDE: " All elements of the default
panel (or equivalent) configuration in all release-blocking desktops
must function correctly in common use" (tflink,
17:50:04)
- (969032) IOError: [Errno 9] Bad file descriptor (tflink, 17:53:12)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969032
(tflink,
17:53:12)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink,
17:53:12)
- AGREED: 969032 -
There isn't much data to go off of here. Ask reporter to try with a
different usb stick and will revisit at a later review
meeting. (tflink,
18:10:42)
- (965841) anaconda no longer creates /etc/sysconfig/network, systems without NetworkManager do not bring up network (tflink, 18:14:24)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965841
(tflink,
18:14:26)
- Proposed Freeze Exceptions, anaconda,
POST (tflink,
18:14:29)
- AGREED: 965841 -
AcceptedFreezeException - While not quite a blocker, this could be a
big problem for systems which don't have NetworkManager installed. A
tested fix would be considered past freeze. (tflink,
18:18:29)
- (967660) anaconda erases additional biosboot partitions outside of what was setup for 'reformat' (destroys spare biosboot partitions one might have on other disks) (tflink, 18:18:37)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967660
(tflink,
18:18:41)
- Proposed Freeze Exceptions, anaconda,
NEW (tflink,
18:18:43)
- AGREED: 967660 -
AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F19 final release criterion
for systems with multiple gpt biosboot partitions: "All known bugs
that can cause corruption of user data must be fixed or documented
at Common F19 bugs" (tflink,
18:24:32)
- (966784) anaconda storage spoke is left in 'warning checking storage configuration' with the 'begin install' button unlocked (logs shows that the spoke is ready) (tflink, 18:24:47)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966784
(tflink,
18:24:51)
- Proposed Freeze Exceptions, anaconda,
NEW (tflink,
18:24:53)
- AGREED: 966784 -
RejectedFreezeException - This may not be clear to users, but it is
by design. If anaconda devs want to change the dialog, please
re-propose. (tflink,
18:30:24)
- (881403) Anaconda doesn't correctly infer if system clock shows UTC or local time (tflink, 18:30:34)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881403
(tflink,
18:30:37)
- Proposed Freeze Exceptions, anaconda,
POST (tflink,
18:30:39)
- AGREED: 881403 -
AcceptedFreezeException - This was a commonly reported issue in F18
and a fix has been in the works for a while now. A tested fix would
be considered after freeze. (tflink,
18:37:30)
- (963958) dialog-warning-symbolic.svg (used as the 'warning triangle' emblem in anaconda) is now grey; if anaconda wants the old orange one, anaconda should ship it (tflink, 18:37:38)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963958
(tflink,
18:37:42)
- Proposed Freeze Exceptions, anaconda,
VERIFIED (tflink,
18:37:44)
- AGREED: 963958 -
AcceptedFreezeException - This fixes a visual issue that confused
many people in beta. A tested fix would be considered after
freeze. (tflink,
18:39:57)
- (967682) Check mark used to indicate selected target disks on Installation Destination is not sufficiently obvious (tflink, 18:40:06)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967682
(tflink,
18:40:09)
- Proposed Freeze Exceptions, anaconda,
NEW (tflink,
18:40:11)
- AGREED: 967682 -
AcceptedFreezeException - This would fix a decent amount of
confusion regarding disk selection in the UI. A tested fix would be
considered past freeze. (tflink,
18:48:11)
- (968023) NFSv3 mount of installation repository fails unless 'nolock' option is passed (tflink, 18:48:15)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968023
(tflink,
18:48:18)
- Proposed Freeze Exceptions, anaconda,
POST (tflink,
18:48:21)
- AGREED: 968023 -
AcceptedFreezeException - This would eliminate a workaround required
for nfs3 repos at install time. A tested fix would be considered
after freeze. (tflink,
18:52:49)
- Open Floor (tflink, 18:55:17)
Meeting ended at 19:02:49 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- (none)
People present (lines said)
- tflink (218)
- adamw (189)
- kparal (160)
- ignatenkobrain (26)
- zodbot (7)
- satellit (7)
- jreznik (2)
- satellit_e (1)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.