#fedora-blocker-review: f20beta-blocker-review-4
Meeting started by kparal at 16:02:28 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- Roll Call (kparal, 16:02:39)
- Our purpose in this meeting is to review
proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept
them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted
blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (kparal,
16:06:19)
- We'll be following the process outlined
at: (kparal,
16:06:19)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
(kparal,
16:06:19)
- The bugs up for review today are available
at: (kparal,
16:06:22)
- http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current
(kparal,
16:06:23)
- Introduction (kparal, 16:06:34)
- Our purpose in this meeting is to review
proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept
them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted
blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (kparal,
16:06:45)
- We'll be following the process outlined
at: (kparal,
16:06:45)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
(kparal,
16:06:45)
- The bugs up for review today are available
at: (kparal,
16:06:45)
- http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current
(kparal,
16:06:46)
- The criteria for release blocking bugs can be
found at: (kparal,
16:06:53)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Beta_Release_Criteria
(kparal,
16:07:03)
- Up for review today, we have: (kparal,
16:07:15)
- 4 Proposed Blockers (kparal,
16:07:22)
- 8 Accepted Blockers (kparal,
16:07:23)
- 5 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (kparal,
16:07:23)
- 3 Accepted Freeze Exceptions (kparal,
16:07:23)
- (1017435) Anaconda uses LVM when Standard Partition is selected in text mode (kparal, 16:08:09)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017435
(kparal,
16:08:10)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED
(kparal,
16:08:10)
- AGREED: 1013586 -
AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 beta release criterion
for text mode and standard partitions: "When using the guided
partitioning flow, the installer must be able to: Complete an
installation using any combination of disk configuration options it
allows the user to select " (kparal,
16:11:13)
- (1017977) FormatDestroyError: error wiping old signatures from /dev/vda2: 1 (kparal, 16:11:34)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017977
(kparal,
16:11:34)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (kparal,
16:11:34)
- AGREED: 1017977 -
RejectedBlocker - This is rejected as a blocker until someone else
can also reproduce the issue or the reporter can provide us with a
clear steps that would help us reproduce the issue. (kparal,
16:18:30)
- (1019541) unknown install shows up as entire disks instead of mount points of selected disks (kparal, 16:18:42)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019541
(kparal,
16:18:42)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (kparal,
16:18:42)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019541#c8
(adamw,
16:25:25)
- ACTION: kparal to
test or delegate 1019541 with valid partition tables and previous
BIOS install and no ESP booted with UEFI (kparal,
16:53:27)
- (1019500) device factories need to set a default name if empty name given for defined device (kparal, 16:54:08)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019500
(kparal,
16:54:08)
- Proposed Blocker, python-blivet,
ASSIGNED (kparal,
16:54:08)
- AGREED: 1019500 -
AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 beta release criterion
for RAID installs with unnamed array: "When using the custom
partitioning flow, the installer must be able to: Reject or disallow
invalid disk and volume configurations without crashing."
(kparal,
17:06:12)
- (1016801) "Don't install the latest software updates" box is unchecked by default, can't be checked permanently (kparal, 17:07:12)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016801
(kparal,
17:07:13)
- Proposed Freeze Exceptions, anaconda,
ASSIGNED (kparal,
17:07:13)
- AGREED: 1016801 -
AcceptedFreezeException - Updates download checkbox might be an
important feature for some people and doesn't present large risk. It
can't be fixed post-release. A fix would be considered as a freeze
exception. (kparal,
17:16:38)
- (1016566) Installing a package silently fails if the GPG key for the yum repo is not installed (kparal, 17:16:48)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016566
(kparal,
17:16:48)
- Proposed Freeze Exceptions, gnome-software,
ASSIGNED (kparal,
17:16:48)
- AGREED: 1016566 -
AcceptedFreezeException - Installing software using gnome-software
is an important feature and we will consider this fix even after
freeze. If anyone finds out that update (not install) is not working
with a missing gpg key, please propose this as a blocker bug.
(kparal,
17:28:18)
- (1011714) btrfs scrub finds csum corruption after btrfs balance (kparal, 17:28:27)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011714
(kparal,
17:28:27)
- Proposed Freeze Exceptions, kernel, POST
(kparal,
17:28:27)
- AGREED: 1011714 -
AcceptedFreezeException - We would like to avoid data corruption on
btrfs. A patch is ready and seems to be safe. We will consider it
past freeze. (kparal,
17:36:50)
- (1017683) Invalid UID in persistent keyring name (kparal, 17:37:36)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017683
(kparal,
17:37:36)
- Proposed Freeze Exceptions, kernel,
MODIFIED (kparal,
17:37:36)
- AGREED: 1017683 -
AcceptedFreezeException - This is a serious issue for Kerberos
users. A fix would be considered past freeze. (kparal,
17:44:05)
- (1012141) [abrt] pulseaudio-4.0-4.gita89ca.fc20: core_free: Process /usr/bin/pulseaudio was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT) (kparal, 17:45:23)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012141
(kparal,
17:45:23)
- Proposed Freeze Exceptions, pulseaudio,
NEW (kparal,
17:45:23)
- AGREED: 1012141 -
AcceptedFreezeException - This is a visible and annoying crash. An
early and safe fix would be considered past freeze. (kparal,
17:51:27)
- (1016959) ValueError: Cannot remove non-leaf device 'btrfs.14' (kparal, 17:53:39)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016959
(kparal,
17:53:39)
- Accepted Blocker, anaconda, NEW (kparal,
17:53:39)
- this is waiting for developers action
(kparal,
17:55:12)
- We don't know whether this is going to be fixed
before go/no-go, dlehman is busy with other bugs (kparal,
18:02:20)
- (1010495) Apple Mac EFI: you have not created a bootloader stage1 target device (kparal, 18:02:46)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010495
(kparal,
18:02:46)
- Accepted Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED
(kparal,
18:02:46)
- the current patch is incomplete and we're
waiting for bcl to refine the patch and submit it (kparal,
18:04:20)
- (986575) installer fails to apply lower bound to resize requests in custom spoke (kparal, 18:05:17)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986575
(kparal,
18:05:17)
- Accepted Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED
(kparal,
18:05:17)
- this is a fairly simple fix, but it hasn't be
implemented yet. waiting on developers (kparal,
18:07:42)
- (1013586) SizeNotPositiveError: spec= param must be >=0 (kparal, 18:08:42)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013586
(kparal,
18:08:42)
- Accepted Blocker, anaconda, NEW (kparal,
18:08:42)
- this is still waiting for developer action. the
fix is expected to be invasive and affect many parts of the
installer (kparal,
18:12:27)
- AGREED: 1013586 -
AcceptedBlocker - We move this blocker from Beta to Final, because
we have an explicit shrinking criterion there, as it was originally
intended: "Any installer mechanism for resizing storage volumes must
correctly attempt the requested operation.". If the fix is ready in
time, please propose as Beta FE. (kparal,
18:31:06)
- (1000891) DVD is oversized (larger than 4.7 GB) (kparal, 18:31:19)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000891
(kparal,
18:31:19)
- Accepted Blocker, distribution, MODIFIED
(kparal,
18:31:19)
- this seems to be a pungi bug, waiting for
dgilmore (kparal,
18:33:22)
- (1015234) F20 Beta TC1 ARM disk images unable to find root filesystem (kparal, 18:35:12)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015234
(kparal,
18:35:12)
- Accepted Blocker, dracut, ASSIGNED (kparal,
18:35:12)
- discussion is still ongoing as how to fix this
properly. it's not clear whether this is fixed with the latest
compose. it would be a good idea to ask the reporter to
retest (kparal,
18:38:59)
- ACTION: adamw to ask
Harald and Dennis about bug 1015234 (kparal,
18:39:25)
- (1013767) rootfs on thinp not found, startup failure (kparal, 18:39:54)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013767
(kparal,
18:39:55)
- Accepted Blocker, dracut, NEW (kparal,
18:39:55)
- the developers are working on this, nothing to
do from QA perspective (kparal,
18:42:08)
- (1013800) devicetree.py:1293:handleVgLvs:DeviceTreeError: failed to look up thin pool (kparal, 18:42:42)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013800
(kparal,
18:42:42)
- Accepted Blocker, python-blivet,
ASSIGNED (kparal,
18:42:42)
- patch is ready for this one. dlehman needs to
submit it (kparal,
18:44:57)
- Open Discussion <your bugs here> (kparal, 18:46:38)
Meeting ended at 18:48:41 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- kparal to test or delegate 1019541 with valid partition tables and previous BIOS install and no ESP booted with UEFI
- adamw to ask Harald and Dennis about bug 1015234
Action items, by person
- adamw
- adamw to ask Harald and Dennis about bug 1015234
- kparal
- kparal to test or delegate 1019541 with valid partition tables and previous BIOS install and no ESP booted with UEFI
People present (lines said)
- kparal (290)
- adamw (205)
- tflink (121)
- dlehman (49)
- roshi (28)
- jwb (24)
- jreznik (24)
- pwhalen (10)
- Viking-Ice (10)
- mkrizek (7)
- zodbot (6)
- satellit (3)
- satellit_RPi (3)
- leigh123linux (2)
- narekb (2)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.