#fedora-blocker-review: F20-blocker-review
Meeting started by kparal at 17:00:54 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- Roll Call (kparal, 17:00:54)
- Introduction (kparal, 17:04:12)
- Our purpose in this meeting is to review
proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept
them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted
blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (kparal,
17:04:12)
- We'll be following the process outlined
at: (kparal,
17:04:12)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
(kparal,
17:04:12)
- The bugs up for review today are available
at: (kparal,
17:04:14)
- http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current
(kparal,
17:04:16)
- The criteria for release blocking bugs can be
found at: (kparal,
17:04:18)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Alpha_Release_Criteria
(kparal,
17:04:20)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Beta_Release_Criteria
(kparal,
17:04:22)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Final_Release_Criteria
(kparal,
17:04:24)
- 7 Proposed Blockers (kparal,
17:04:37)
- 11 Accepted Blockers (kparal,
17:04:37)
- 4 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (kparal,
17:04:37)
- 0 Accepted Freeze Exceptions (kparal,
17:04:37)
- Proposed Blockers (kparal,
17:05:03)
- (1029790) dracut cannot handle encrypted partitions with a key file on the root file system (kparal, 17:05:12)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029790
(kparal,
17:05:12)
- Proposed Blocker, dracut, NEW (kparal,
17:05:12)
- AGREED: 1029790 -
RejectedBlocker - This does not affect a large enough user base to
guarantee a blocker. We still would like to see this fixed before
release. If the fix is ready during freeze period, please propose
for a freeze exception. (kparal,
17:14:25)
- (1025908) unable to unlock LUKS encrypted device from Live-Desktop (kparal, 17:14:36)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025908
(kparal,
17:14:36)
- Proposed Blocker, gnome-disk-utility,
NEW (kparal,
17:14:36)
- AGREED: 1025908 -
RejectedBlocker - Currently this seems to be very hard to hit, and
therefore rejected as a blocker. Please repropose if you find a
reliable reproducer. (kparal,
17:19:22)
- (1007121) [abrt] system-config-services-0.101.10-2.fc20: connection.py:651:call_blocking:DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.UnknownMethod: Method "list_services" with signature "" on interface "org.fedoraproject.Config.Services.ServiceHerder" doesn't exist (kparal, 17:19:31)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1007121
(kparal,
17:19:31)
- Proposed Blocker, system-config-services,
NEW (kparal,
17:19:31)
- AGREED: 1007121 -
AcceptedBlocker - Violates criterion "All applications that can be
launched using the standard graphical mechanism of a
release-blocking desktop after a default installation of that
desktop must start successfully and withstand a basic functionality
test". This needs to get fixed or removed from KDE spin.
(kparal,
17:25:48)
- (1026860) Instantiated service is not run, it stays in inactive state (and systemd debug log does not state why) (kparal, 17:26:01)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026860
(kparal,
17:26:02)
- Proposed Blocker, systemd, NEW (kparal,
17:26:02)
- AGREED: 1026860 -
Punt - We will wait until developers provided more information about
cause and impact of this bug, so that we can better decide whether
this should block the release. (kparal,
17:35:15)
- (1028207) non US keyboard layouts not working at console (kparal, 17:35:20)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028207
(kparal,
17:35:20)
- Proposed Blocker, systemd, NEW (kparal,
17:35:20)
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_sign
(kparal,
17:44:54)
- AGREED: 1028207 -
AcceptedBlocker - Violates criterion "A system installed with a
release-blocking desktop must boot to a log in screen where it is
possible to log in to a working desktop using a user account created
during installation or a 'first boot' utility" when it comes to
booting from an encrypted drive with one of the affected
keymaps. (kparal,
17:45:08)
- (1006386) Boot takes 27 seconds longer with /var/log/journal than without (kparal, 17:45:21)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006386
(kparal,
17:45:21)
- Proposed Blocker, systemd, NEW (kparal,
17:45:21)
- AGREED: 1006386 -
Punt - We would like to see more information from systemd developers
before deciding a blocker bug question. Also, we would like to get
confirmation that this affects F20, because this report only
mentions Rawhide and the linked (fixed) reports go to F19.
(kparal,
17:57:35)
- (1029594) Regression from f17 - Xorg crashes (kparal, 17:57:41)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029594
(kparal,
17:57:41)
- Proposed Blocker, xorg-x11-drv-ati, NEW
(kparal,
17:57:42)
- AGREED: 1029594 -
RejectedBlocker - This doesn't seem to be a general issue, but
affect only the reporter. If this turns out to be an issue affecting
large portion of our user base, please re-propose. Also try to run
clean F20 environment from LiveCD and report back. (kparal,
18:02:18)
- Proposed Freeze Exceptions (kparal,
18:03:01)
- (972265) When using a kickstart that specifies nothing about repo, 'closest mirror' doesn't seem to be usable (kparal, 18:03:06)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972265
(kparal,
18:03:06)
- Proposed Freeze Exceptions, anaconda,
NEW (kparal,
18:03:06)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972266
is the other bug i found in this use case (adamw,
18:10:45)
- AGREED: 972265 -
AcceptedFreezeException - Kickstarts are expected to be used as
partial configuration. It should be possible to configure manually
the remaining pieces. Unless this has changed, this is an
inconvenient bug and we would accept a patch after freeze if
self-contained and safe. (kparal,
18:22:36)
- (972266) Installation Destination spoke behaves strangely when installing from a minimal (packages only) kickstart (kparal, 18:22:44)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972266
(kparal,
18:22:44)
- Proposed Freeze Exceptions, anaconda,
NEW (kparal,
18:22:44)
- AGREED: 972266 -
AcceptedFreezeException - This is obviously unintended and
unexpected behaviour, and while it can be worked around, the
workaround is quite hard to discover and to do, and looks really
bad. We would accept a patch after freeze if self-contained and
safe. (kparal,
18:25:53)
- (1023609) 'biosdevname=0' not passed into installed system (kparal, 18:26:05)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023609
(kparal,
18:26:05)
- Proposed Freeze Exceptions, anaconda,
POST (kparal,
18:26:05)
- AGREED: 1023609 -
AcceptedFreezeException - This setting should be consistent in the
installer environment and in the installed system. We would accept a
patch after freeze if self-contained and safe. (kparal,
18:28:21)
- (1022810) error detecting raid1 thin pool layout (kparal, 18:28:22)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022810
(kparal,
18:28:23)
- Proposed Freeze Exceptions, python-blivet,
NEW (kparal,
18:28:23)
- AGREED: 1022810 -
RejectedFreezeException - This is fine if it is fixed before Final
freeze. But during the freeze we feel that this is a risky patch
that might cause different side effects. If developers feel that
this should get included during freeze and it's safe, please
re-propose. (kparal,
18:35:38)
- Open Floor (kparal, 18:38:30)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Beta_Release_Criteria#Kickstart_delivery
says "The installer must be able to use all available kickstart
delivery methods." and "The intent of available is that the
installer developers get to define the set of supported kickstart
methods.", but since the anaconda devs are always telling people to
use partial ks, it could be argued that they themselves define
partial ks (robatino,
18:42:49)
Meeting ended at 18:46:19 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- (none)
People present (lines said)
- kparal (198)
- adamw (105)
- Viking-Ice (87)
- roshi (65)
- robatino (10)
- zodbot (4)
- tflink (1)
- satellit (1)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.