#fedora-blocker-review: F23-blocker-review
Meeting started by roshi at 16:00:24 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- Roll Call (roshi, 16:00:24)
- Introduction (roshi, 16:05:45)
- Our purpose in this meeting is to review
proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept
them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted
blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (roshi,
16:05:45)
- We'll be following the process outlined
at: (roshi,
16:05:49)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
(roshi,
16:05:52)
- The bugs up for review today are available
at: (roshi,
16:05:54)
- http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current
(roshi,
16:05:57)
- The criteria for release blocking bugs can be
found at: (roshi,
16:05:59)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Alpha_Release_Criteria
(roshi,
16:06:02)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Beta_Release_Criteria
(roshi,
16:06:05)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Final_Release_Criteria
(roshi,
16:06:08)
- (1258992) [abrt] initial-setup: __init__.py:135:prompt:TypeError: 'dict_values' object does not support indexing (roshi, 16:06:58)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258992
(roshi,
16:07:01)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, VERIFIED
(roshi,
16:07:03)
- AGREED: - 1258992 -
AcceptedBlocker Beta - This bug is a clear violation of the
following criteria: "A system installed without a graphical package
set must boot to a state where it is possible to log in through at
least one of the default virtual consoles." (roshi,
16:16:05)
- (1258992) [abrt] initial-setup: __init__.py:135:prompt:TypeError: 'dict_values' object does not support indexing (roshi, 16:19:35)
- (1259506) anaconda not parsing kickstart files containing %include (roshi, 16:29:52)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259506
(roshi,
16:29:55)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, POST (roshi,
16:29:57)
- AGREED: - 1259506 -
AcceptedFreezeException Beta AcceptedBlocker Final - This would be a
good thing to have fixed during Beta so accepted as an FE for Beta.
It was also voted as a blocker for final in case a fix doesn't
surface in time. (roshi,
16:43:20)
- (1260318) TypeError: uid should be integer, not str (roshi, 16:43:27)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260318
(roshi,
16:43:28)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, POST' (roshi,
16:43:28)
- AGREED: - 1260318 -
AcceptedBlocker Beta - This bug is a violation of the "assign mount
points to existing storage volumes" criterion, as it fails when
attempting to reuse /home. (roshi,
16:57:18)
- (1260875) Cannot log in as root after install of recent Fedora 23 images (roshi, 16:57:22)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260875
(roshi,
16:57:25)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED
(roshi,
16:57:28)
- AGREED: - 1260875 -
AcceptedBlocker Beta - This bug is a violation of the following Beta
criterion: "It must be possible to log in to the default Cockpit
instance" (roshi,
17:04:23)
- (1245838) Upgrade to F23 crashes early in upgrade boot (roshi, 17:04:26)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245838
(roshi,
17:04:29)
- Proposed Blocker, fedup, NEW (roshi,
17:04:31)
- AGREED: - 1245838 -
RejectedBlocker Beta - This is no longer a blocker because fedup is
no longer the official supported means of updating a system.
(roshi,
17:09:34)
- (1257131) System reboots after shutdown (roshi, 17:09:43)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257131
(roshi,
17:09:43)
- Proposed Blocker, kernel, NEW (roshi,
17:09:43)
- AGREED: - 1257131 -
RejectedBlocker AcceptedFreezeException - This bug doesn't impact
enough hardware to warrant blocker status, but getting a fix in for
Beta would be great. (roshi,
17:16:56)
- (1261637) anaconda cannot create users with lorax < 23.17-1 (roshi, 17:17:03)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261637
(roshi,
17:17:06)
- Proposed Blocker, lorax, ON_QA (roshi,
17:17:09)
- AGREED: - 1261637 -
AcceptedBlocker Beta - violates 'working mechanism to create user
account' criterion in case of a minimal install (adamw,
17:23:35)
- (1260799) pyanaconda.bootloader.BootLoaderError: failed to set new efi boot target. This is most likely a kernel or firmware bug. (roshi, 17:23:43)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260799
(roshi,
17:23:46)
- Proposed Blocker, python-blivet, POST
(roshi,
17:23:48)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235323
is the bug i'm thinking of. see #c12 (adamw,
17:26:26)
- AGREED: - 1260799 -
AcceptedBlocker Beta - This bug is a clear violation of the
following criterion: "A system installed with a release-blocking
desktop must boot to a log in screen where it is possible to log in
to a working desktop using a user account created during
installation or a 'first boot' utility." (roshi,
17:29:11)
- (1261439) blivet.errors.DeviceError: ('cannot replace active format', 'pv00') (roshi, 17:29:21)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261439
(roshi,
17:29:24)
- Proposed Blocker, python-blivet, POST
(roshi,
17:29:26)
- AGREED: - 1261439 -
AcceptedBlocker Beta - This bug is a clear violation of the
following criterion: "When using the guided partitioning flow, the
installer must be able to:...Remove existing storage volumes to free
up space, at the user's direction" (roshi,
17:32:43)
- (1256531) dnf install crashes if terminal window is too small (roshi, 17:33:13)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256531
(roshi,
17:33:16)
- Proposed Blocker, dnf, NEW (roshi,
17:33:18)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1066623
(kparal,
17:37:03)
- AGREED: - 1256531 -
AcceptedBlocker Final - This bug is a conditional violation of the
following criterion: "The installed system must be able to download
and install updates with the default console package manager." We're
accepting this because it can cause catastrophic damage to the
system. (roshi,
17:44:14)
- (1261034) dnf doesn't handle Obsoletes (for split packages) (roshi, 17:44:22)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261034
(roshi,
17:44:25)
- Proposed Blocker, dnf, NEW (roshi,
17:44:27)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260394
seems to be the bug that's actually caused by this (adamw,
17:47:34)
- AGREED: - 1260394 -
AcceptedBlocker Final - This bug is a violation of the following
criterion: ""For each one of the release-blocking package sets, it
must be possible to successfully complete an upgrade from a fully
updated installation of the previous stable Fedora release with that
package set installed. ... The upgraded system must meet all
release criteria." (roshi,
18:03:27)
- (1261721) preexisting LUKS /home cannot be assigned as mountpoint for new installation (roshi, 18:03:40)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261721
(roshi,
18:03:43)
- Proposed Blocker, python-blivet, NEW
(roshi,
18:03:46)
- AGREED: - 1261721 -
Punt - We'd like some more info on this before voting. (roshi,
18:09:34)
- (1239089) /etc/issue in Fedora server should contain cockpit URL (roshi, 18:11:17)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239089
(roshi,
18:11:20)
- Proposed Freeze Exceptions, fedora-release,
ON_QA (roshi,
18:11:22)
- AGREED: - 1239089 -
AcceptedFreezeException Beta - It would be good to get this pulled
in during freeze. (roshi,
18:14:54)
- (1254299) f23 workstation x86_64 Alpha-2 live locks up (roshi, 18:14:57)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254299
(roshi,
18:15:00)
- Proposed Freeze Exceptions, kernel, NEW
(roshi,
18:15:02)
- AGREED: - 1254299 -
RejectedFreezeException Beta - This issue seems to be resolved and
no longer requires FE status. (roshi,
18:18:39)
- (1259630) BeagleBone black not booting from MMC (roshi, 18:19:29)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259630
(roshi,
18:19:29)
- Proposed Freeze Exceptions, kernel,
ON_QA (roshi,
18:19:29)
- AGREED: - 1259630 -
Punt - We'd like more info from the ARM folks before we vote on
this. (roshi,
18:24:34)
- (1240147) SugarExt can not be loaded properly, blocking Sugar startup (roshi, 18:24:38)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240147
(roshi,
18:24:41)
- Proposed Freeze Exceptions, sugar-toolkit-gtk3,
ON_QA (roshi,
18:24:43)
- AGREED: - 1240147 -
AcceptedFreezeException Beta - This is a small, self-contained fix
that would be good to pull in. (roshi,
18:28:04)
- (1259443) Add brw_meta_fast_clear crash workaround patch (roshi, 18:29:44)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259443
(roshi,
18:29:44)
- Proposed Blocker, mesa, ASSIGNED (roshi,
18:29:44)
- AGREED: - 1259443 -
AcceptedBlocker Beta - This bug is a conditional violation of the
following criterion: "No part of any release-blocking desktop's
panel (or equivalent) configuration may crash on startup or be
entirely non-functional." (roshi,
18:37:59)
- (1261721) preexisting LUKS /home cannot be assigned as mountpoint for new installation (roshi, 18:38:19)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261721
(roshi,
18:38:22)
- Proposed Blocker, python-blivet, NEW
(roshi,
18:38:24)
- AGREED: - 1261721 -
Punt - We'd like some more information on this bug and clearer
reproduction steps before we vote. (roshi,
18:57:51)
- Open Floor (roshi, 18:57:57)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256712 (kparal, 19:01:15)
- AGREED: 1256712 -
RejectedBlocker Beta AcceptedBlocker Final - this is moved from beta
to final blocker; on re-consideration the impact isn't really severe
enough to delay the beta release, documenting is sufficient for
beta (adamw,
19:04:44)
- Open Floor (adamw, 19:04:49)
Meeting ended at 19:11:11 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- (none)
People present (lines said)
- roshi (268)
- adamw (182)
- sgallagh (111)
- kparal (99)
- danofsatx (28)
- kalev (24)
- zodbot (8)
- kushal (4)
- satellit_e (2)
- tflink (0)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.