#fedora-blocker-review: F24-blocker-review

Meeting started by adamw at 16:00:10 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

  1. Roll Call (adamw, 16:00:10)
  2. Introduction (adamw, 16:03:10)
    1. Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (adamw, 16:03:10)
    2. We'll be following the process outlined at: (adamw, 16:03:11)
    3. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (adamw, 16:03:11)
    4. The bugs up for review today are available at: (adamw, 16:03:13)
    5. http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (adamw, 16:03:15)
    6. The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (adamw, 16:03:17)
    7. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Alpha_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:03:21)
    8. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Beta_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:03:23)
    9. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Final_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:03:25)
    10. kparal to secretarialize, thanks kparal (adamw, 16:06:39)

  3. (1315494) C.UTF-8 doesn't actually work as a default locale (adamw, 16:07:07)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315494 (adamw, 16:07:07)
    2. Proposed Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED (adamw, 16:07:07)
    3. AGREED: 1315494 - AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - this clearly violates the criteria (installer fails to run at all) and it's unlikely we can make the Beta release with the same anaconda build we used for Alpha (which did not suffer from the bug) (adamw, 16:11:54)

  4. (1318067) [anaconda] non-bootable system after fresh install of current F24 on bare metal (adamw, 16:12:01)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318067 (adamw, 16:12:01)
    2. Proposed Blocker, grub2, NEW (adamw, 16:12:01)
    3. AGREED: 1318067 - punt (delay decision) - we're generally inclined to take this as a Beta or Final blocker, but we'd like to try and gather some more precise data to be sure how wide the impact is first (adamw, 16:20:10)

  5. (1321330) on i.mx6 systems the console does not start correctly (adamw, 16:20:15)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321330 (adamw, 16:20:15)
    2. Proposed Blocker, kernel, NEW (adamw, 16:20:16)
    3. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Supported_Platforms lists only Fedora 21 and older :) (kparal, 16:25:45)
    4. AGREED: 1321330 - AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - violates Alpha criterion "All release-blocking images must boot in their supported configurations" on several supported ARM platforms (see "Supported ARM platforms" footnote) (adamw, 16:31:07)

  6. (1262556) AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'get_data' (adamw, 16:32:34)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262556 (adamw, 16:32:34)
    2. Proposed Blocker, NetworkManager, NEW (adamw, 16:32:35)
    3. AGREED: 1262556 - AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - testing indicates that this bug violates "When using a dedicated installer image, the installer must be able to complete an installation using the text, graphical and VNC installation interfaces." (and other 'complete an install' criteria) for at least some affected systems, likely wifi-only installs from netinst / DVD (adamw, 16:41:48)

  7. (1320395) No 'favorites' in F24 KDE menu (adamw, 16:41:59)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320395 (adamw, 16:41:59)
    2. Proposed Blocker, plasma-desktop, ON_QA (adamw, 16:41:59)
    3. AGREED: 1320395 - RejectedBlocker (Beta), AcceptedBlocker (Final) - we agreed this isn't really severe enough to constitute "entirely non-functional" (the Beta wording) but does violate the Final criterion "All elements of the default panel (or equivalent) configuration in all release-blocking desktops must function correctly in typical use." (adamw, 16:54:03)
    4. that's all for Beta, moving onto Final (adamw, 16:54:38)

  8. (1320396) [abrt] gnome-software: magazine_chain_pop_head(): gnome-software killed by SIGSEGV (adamw, 16:54:43)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320396 (adamw, 16:54:43)
    2. Proposed Blocker, gnome-software, NEW (adamw, 16:54:43)
    3. AGREED: 1320396 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - this appears to violate "Release-blocking desktops must notify the user of available updates, but must not do so when running as a live image." (adamw, 17:00:33)

  9. (1320666) Show correct Fedora 24 background in KDE (adamw, 17:00:42)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320666 (adamw, 17:00:43)
    2. Proposed Blocker, kde-settings, ASSIGNED (adamw, 17:00:43)
    3. AGREED: 1320666 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - clear violation of "The proposed final Fedora artwork must be included and used as the background on release-blocking desktops." (adamw, 17:09:33)

  10. (1314637) SELinux is preventing fwupd from 'write' accesses on the directory 0000:00:02.0. (adamw, 17:09:43)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314637 (adamw, 17:09:43)
    2. Proposed Blocker, selinux-policy, MODIFIED (adamw, 17:09:44)
    3. AGREED: 1314637 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - violates "There must be no SELinux denial notifications or crash notifications on boot of or during installation from a release-blocking live image, or at first login after a default install of a release-blocking desktop." It's not clear whether this is at all hardware-dependent, but even if it is, it's clear many people are hitting it, enough to take it as a blocker (adamw, 17:15:55)

  11. (1316514) SELinux is preventing colord from 'read' accesses on the file /etc/udev/hwdb.bin. (adamw, 17:18:34)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316514 (adamw, 17:18:34)
    2. Proposed Blocker, selinux-policy, MODIFIED (adamw, 17:18:34)
    3. AGREED: 1316514 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - clear violation of "There must be no SELinux denial notifications or crash notifications on boot of or during installation from a release-blocking live image, or at first login after a default install of a release-blocking desktop." (adamw, 17:22:39)

  12. (1318045) Incorrect keymap when decrypting encrypted partitions (adamw, 17:23:03)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318045 (adamw, 17:23:04)
    2. Proposed Blocker, systemd, NEW (adamw, 17:23:04)
    3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681250 (pschindl, 17:28:23)
    4. AGREED: 1318045 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - as described, this is a clear violation of "If a particular keyboard layout has been configured for the system, that keyboard layout must be used: ... When unlocking encrypted storage volumes during boot" (adamw, 17:37:21)


Meeting ended at 17:42:21 UTC (full logs).

Action items

  1. (none)


People present (lines said)

  1. adamw (185)
  2. kparal (53)
  3. RaphGro (39)
  4. danofsatx (28)
  5. jkurik (22)
  6. pwhalen (21)
  7. garretraziel (21)
  8. pschindl (21)
  9. lbrabec (12)
  10. satellit_e (10)
  11. dgilmore (9)
  12. zodbot (8)
  13. kparal2 (3)
  14. lupinix (1)


Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.