========================================== #fedora-blocker-review: F24-blocker-review ========================================== Meeting started by adamw at 16:07:09 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2016-04-11/f24-blocker-review.2016-04-11-16.07.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (adamw, 16:07:09) * Introduction (adamw, 16:10:16) * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (adamw, 16:10:16) * We'll be following the process outlined at: (adamw, 16:10:17) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (adamw, 16:10:18) * The bugs up for review today are available at: (adamw, 16:10:20) * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (adamw, 16:10:22) * The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (adamw, 16:10:24) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Alpha_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:10:26) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Beta_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:10:28) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Final_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:10:30) * kparal will secretarialize (adamw, 16:11:51) * (1321393) blivet.errors.DeviceTreeError: no slaves found for device md127 (adamw, 16:12:29) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321393 (adamw, 16:12:29) * Proposed Blocker, python-blivet, ASSIGNED (adamw, 16:12:29) * AGREED: 1321393 - punt (delay decision) - we still didn't get categorical information here, but we suspect it was caused by multiple installer launches, which is an unfortunate UI issue but wouldn't be a blocker. if we don't get new information by next week this will be rejected (adamw, 16:24:16) * ACTION: adamw to ping hughsie about his 1321393 experience (adamw, 16:24:24) * moving on to proposed Final blockers (adamw, 16:26:02) * (1325471) resolving Supplements: dependencies pull in multilib packages (adamw, 16:26:07) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325471 (adamw, 16:26:07) * Proposed Blocker, dnf, NEW (adamw, 16:26:07) * AGREED: 1325471 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - details are not nailed down yet, but installing a ton of multilib packages on system update is considered a conditional violation of "The installed system must be able to download and install updates with the default console package manager." and accepted as a Final blocker and Beta freeze exception for now. decision may be changed based on later info (adamw, 16:41:03) * (1320273) Grub2 out of memory error (adamw, 16:41:26) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320273 (adamw, 16:41:26) * Proposed Blocker, grub2, NEW (adamw, 16:41:26) * AGREED: 1320273 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - this seems like a clear violation of "The installer must be able to install into free space alongside an existing clean Windows installation and install a bootloader which can boot into both Windows and Fedora." in the case of a UEFI windows install (adamw, 16:47:30) * (1317927) selinux prevents systemd-coredump from working (adamw, 16:47:43) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317927 (adamw, 16:47:43) * Proposed Blocker, selinux-policy, NEW (adamw, 16:47:43) * AGREED: 1317927 - RejectedBlocker (Final) - firefox being unusable would constitute a blocker issue, however no-one present in the blocker meeting has hit this issue in F24 testing and the bug seems unclear on exactly what configuration is required to trigger it. can be re-proposed with a clearer reproducer and blocker justification (adamw, 16:53:22) * circling back to the newly proposed beta blocker (adamw, 16:53:59) * (1326047) Network Manager IPv4 and IPv6 dialogs incorrectly displayed, unusable with mouse (adamw, 16:54:30) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326047 (adamw, 16:54:30) * Proposed Blocker, NetworkManager, NEW (adamw, 16:54:31) * AGREED: 1326047 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - violates "All applications that can be launched using the standard graphical mechanism of a release-blocking desktop after a default installation of that desktop must...withstand a basic functionality test." The 'advanced network config' experience for Beta is unfortunate, but we don't consider it a sufficiently serious case to take as a conditional violation of e.g. updates criterion (adamw, 17:08:22) * AGREED: we do think 1326047 sucks and would like it fixed ASAP, and will likely vote +1 FE for Beta if it comes to that. (adamw, 17:08:51) * (1326055) Applications using Qt 5 are not displaying spinner and checked menu items properly. (adamw, 17:09:26) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326055 (adamw, 17:09:26) * Proposed Blocker, adwaita-qt, NEW (adamw, 17:09:27) * AGREED: 1326055 - RejectedBlocker (Beta) - this clearly does not violate any of the Beta criteria, nothing in those depends on Qt apps running on Workstation (adamw, 17:18:43) * Beta accepted blocker round up (adamw, 17:19:19) * info is still requested on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262556 (adamw, 17:19:30) * we more or less know what's going on with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306808 (btrfs volume reuse bug) and anaconda team expects it to be dealt with some time this week (adamw, 17:20:21) * Beta freeze is 2016-04-19 , so we'll be reviewing FEs next week (adamw, 17:22:24) * Open floor (adamw, 17:23:24) Meeting ended at 17:28:11 UTC. Action Items ------------ * adamw to ping hughsie about his 1321393 experience Action Items, by person ----------------------- * adamw * adamw to ping hughsie about his 1321393 experience * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * adamw (210) * sgallagh (83) * cmurf (81) * kparal (42) * danofsatx (16) * pwhalen (11) * pschindl (11) * garretraziel (9) * jpigface (8) * zodbot (5) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot