#fedora-blocker-review: F25-blocker-review
Meeting started by adamw at 16:00:01 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- Roll Call (adamw, 16:00:02)
- Introduction (adamw, 16:02:28)
- Our purpose in this meeting is to review
proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept
them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted
blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (adamw,
16:02:28)
- We'll be following the process outlined
at: (adamw,
16:02:28)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
(adamw,
16:02:30)
- The bugs up for review today are available
at: (adamw,
16:02:30)
- http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current
(adamw,
16:02:32)
- The criteria for release blocking bugs can be
found at: (adamw,
16:02:34)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_25_Alpha_Release_Criteria
(adamw,
16:02:38)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_25_Beta_Release_Criteria
(adamw,
16:02:40)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_25_Final_Release_Criteria
(adamw,
16:02:42)
- 4 Proposed Blockers (adamw,
16:02:51)
- 0 Everything Else (for Beta) (adamw,
16:03:01)
- 5 Proposed Blockers (for Final) (adamw,
16:03:17)
- coremodule will secretarialize (adamw,
16:04:19)
- (1369786) Autopart fails on installation from live usb created by l-i-t-d (adamw, 16:04:40)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369786
(adamw,
16:04:40)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (adamw,
16:04:41)
- AGREED: 1369786 -
AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - clear violation of "All release-blocking
images must boot in their supported configurations. This criterion
differs from the similar Alpha criterion only in that it requires
all supported methods of writing a Fedora USB stick to work, not
just any single one" and "The installer must be able to complete an
installation to a single disk using automatic partitioning."
(adamw,
16:07:59)
- (1366793) Nothing obsoletes retired dnf-langpacks packages, breaks upgrade from Fedora 23 to 25+ (adamw, 16:10:00)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366793
(adamw,
16:10:00)
- Proposed Blocker, dnf, ASSIGNED (adamw,
16:10:00)
- the FPC ticket we filed on this -
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/645 - has been kicked to FESCo -
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1620 (adamw,
16:12:02)
- AGREED: 1366793 -
AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - the lack of a clear policy here makes the
decision somewhat difficult, but in the absence of a policy we hold
this to be a violation of "For each one of the release-blocking
package sets, it must be possible to successfully complete a direct
upgrade from fully updated installations of the last two stable
Fedora releases with that package set installed." (adamw,
16:15:36)
- (1369492) mouse cursor coordinates are incorrect in VM under wayland, makes cursor unusable (adamw, 16:15:58)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369492
(adamw,
16:15:58)
- Proposed Blocker, mutter, NEW (adamw,
16:15:59)
- AGREED: 1369492 -
AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - clearly violates "The release must be able
host virtual guest instances of the same release." combined with
multiple desktop criteria (adamw,
16:19:30)
- (1026119) fails to unmount encrypted filesystem (/dev/mapper/luks-partition) containing /var/log on every shutdown (adamw, 16:19:38)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026119
(adamw,
16:19:38)
- Proposed Blocker, systemd, NEW (adamw,
16:19:38)
- https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/867#issuecomment-148349919
(adamw,
16:22:17)
- AGREED: 1026119 -
RejectedBlocker (Beta) - based on all available information this
affects only a corner case (encrypted separate /var partition) and
even when encountered appears not to have serious
consequences (adamw,
16:26:17)
- moving on to proposed Final blockers
(adamw,
16:26:52)
- (1370118) Some fonts are missing on the netinst and dvd (adamw, 16:26:58)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370118
(adamw,
16:26:58)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (adamw,
16:26:58)
- AGREED: 1370118 -
AcceptedBlocker (Final) - clear violation of "The installer must
correctly display all sufficiently complete translations available
for use." (adamw,
16:30:44)
- (1370889) libgweather "Failed to get METAR data: 404 Not Found" (adamw, 16:30:52)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370889
(adamw,
16:30:52)
- Proposed Blocker, libgweather, MODIFIED
(adamw,
16:30:52)
- AGREED: 1370889 -
AcceptedBlocker (Final) - this violates "All applications that can
be launched using the standard graphical mechanism of a
release-blocking desktop after a default installation of that
desktop must start successfully and withstand a basic functionality
test" in the case of gnome-weather (this is considered 'basic
functionality' of gnome-weather) (adamw,
16:35:11)
- (1366004) [abrt] setroubleshoot-server: service.py:647:_message_cb:SystemError: <built-in function isinstance> returned a result with an error set (adamw, 16:35:20)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366004
(adamw,
16:35:20)
- Proposed Blocker, setroubleshoot, NEW
(adamw,
16:35:20)
- AGREED: 1366004 -
RejectedBlocker (Final) - so far this doesn't seem to be a crash on
boot (thus does not violate cited criterion) and also doesn't seem
reliably reproducible on regular use of the sealert app (thus
doesn't violate 'basic functionality' criterion for pre-installed
apps). can be reproposed if more details emerge (adamw,
16:51:07)
- (1295031) cannot preview files under wayland/XWayland (adamw, 16:51:13)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295031
(adamw,
16:51:13)
- Proposed Blocker, sushi, NEW (adamw,
16:51:13)
- AGREED: 1295031 -
RejectedBlocker (Final) This is niche functionality that doesn't
quite pass the bar of "basic funcionality" for default-installed
applications. (adamw,
17:00:32)
- (1370136) glibc update corrupts display of a running system (adamw, 17:00:56)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370136
(adamw,
17:00:56)
- Proposed Blocker, systemd, POST (adamw,
17:00:56)
- AGREED: 1370136 -
punt (delay decision) - we don't have a clear vote on this at
present and it's likely to be resolved long before Final in any
case, so we're delaying it for now (adamw,
17:26:58)
- going back to a newly-proposed Beta
blocker (adamw,
17:27:28)
- (1225184) anaconda does not detect RAID devices (adamw, 17:27:31)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225184
(adamw,
17:27:31)
- Proposed Blocker, python-blivet,
ASSIGNED (adamw,
17:27:32)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219264#c18
(adamw,
17:32:24)
- AGREED: 1225184 -
AcceptedBlocker (Final) - as this is reproducible with clean disk
images it seems like a violation of "When using the custom
partitioning flow, the installer must be able to correctly
interpret...any disk with a valid ms-dos or gpt disk label and
partition table containing ext4 partitions, LVM and/or btrfs
volumes, and/or software RAID arrays at RAID levels 0, 1 and 5
containing ext4 partitions" for live images (adamw,
17:49:24)
- Open floor (adamw, 17:49:34)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225184#c66
(cmurf,
17:50:04)
Meeting ended at 17:54:44 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- (none)
People present (lines said)
- adamw (181)
- kparal (128)
- cmurf (102)
- sgallagh (64)
- coremodule (16)
- dgilmore (11)
- zodbot (9)
- pwhalen (8)
- handsome_pirate (7)
- mboddu (6)
- pschindl (5)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.