========================================== #fedora-blocker-review: F25-blocker-review ========================================== Meeting started by adamw at 16:00:34 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2016-10-03/f25-blocker-review.2016-10-03-16.00.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (adamw, 16:00:34) * pschindl will secretarialize (adamw, 16:06:43) * coremodule will refill adamw's drink (adamw, 16:08:18) * Introduction (adamw, 16:08:39) * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (adamw, 16:08:40) * We'll be following the process outlined at: (adamw, 16:08:40) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (adamw, 16:08:40) * The bugs up for review today are available at: (adamw, 16:08:41) * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (adamw, 16:08:43) * The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (adamw, 16:08:45) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_25_Alpha_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:08:47) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_25_Beta_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:08:51) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_25_Final_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:08:53) * 3 Proposed Blockers (adamw, 16:09:07) * 3 Accepted Blockers (adamw, 16:09:08) * 6 Proposed Blockers (adamw, 16:09:26) * (1379865) Current Fedora 25 and Rawhide cannot detect Intel firmware RAID set (adamw, 16:12:31) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379865 (adamw, 16:12:31) * Proposed Blocker, libblockdev, POST (adamw, 16:12:31) * AGREED: 1379865 - AcceptedBlocker - violates Beta criterion "The installer must be able to detect and install to hardware or firmware RAID storage devices." (adamw, 16:16:39) * (1377113) [selinux-policy] media inserted into by optical drive do not get auto-mounted (adamw, 16:16:48) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377113 (adamw, 16:16:48) * Proposed Blocker, selinux-policy, POST (adamw, 16:16:48) * AGREED: 1377113 - AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - violates Beta criterion "Automatic mounting of removable media on insertion must work in release-blocking desktops." (adamw, 16:21:37) * (1381045) xorg-x11-drv-qxl update lets sddm coredump (adamw, 16:21:47) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381045 (adamw, 16:21:47) * Proposed Blocker, xorg-x11-drv-qxl, NEW (adamw, 16:21:48) * AGREED: 1381045 - Accepted0Day (Beta) - the affected package is in updates-testing, so the Beta compose is not affected, but Beta installs will break on first update. So we accept this as a 0-day blocker, meaning (for Beta) a fixed package must be added to the update or the update must be unpushed, by go/no-go day (adamw, 16:36:10) * Moving to Beta accepted blockers: not reviewing blocker status but checking that fix is in progress (adamw, 16:36:46) * (1369786) Autopart fails on installation from live usb created by l-i-t-d (adamw, 16:36:53) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369786 (adamw, 16:36:53) * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, POST (adamw, 16:36:53) * (1374864) initial-setup is not completable when there's no network link (adamw, 16:53:48) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374864 (adamw, 16:53:48) * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, POST (adamw, 16:53:49) * a proposed fix for this is under review, we have asked dgilmore to check status with current nightlies and test proposed fix if possible (adamw, 16:56:21) * (1225184) Live installer does not detect RAID devices (adamw, 16:56:27) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225184 (adamw, 16:56:27) * Accepted Blocker, python-blivet, VERIFIED (adamw, 16:56:28) * the fix for this has been tested, only needs a new anaconda build (adamw, 16:59:38) * moving to proposed Final blockers (adamw, 17:01:21) * (1378156) TypeError: Must be number, not str (adamw, 17:01:35) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378156 (adamw, 17:01:35) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (adamw, 17:01:35) * LINK: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/38358/file/disk_custom_iscsi-anaconda.log (adamw, 17:02:50) * AGREED: 1378156 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - violates "The installer must be able to detect (if possible) and install to supported network-attached storage devices." (adamw, 17:05:41) * (1379459) Fedora 25 official backgrounds not yet present in images / installed systems (adamw, 17:05:48) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379459 (adamw, 17:05:48) * Proposed Blocker, desktop-backgrounds, ON_QA (adamw, 17:05:49) * AGREED: 1379459 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - violates "The proposed final Fedora artwork must be included and used as the background on release-blocking desktops. All Fedora artwork visible in critical path actions on release-blocking desktops must be consistent with the proposed final theme." (adamw, 17:09:58) * (1381039) USB devices aren't found or enumerated, results in boot failure from USB stick installation media (adamw, 17:10:08) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381039 (adamw, 17:10:08) * Proposed Blocker, kernel, NEW (adamw, 17:10:08) * AGREED: 1381039 - RejectedBlocker - so far we only know of a single affected system, and it's not a regression; this isn't a broad enough impact for a hardware-specific bug to be counted as a violation of the criteria. this decision can be revisited if more systems are found to be affected (adamw, 17:20:33) * (1380859) Should obsolete liveusb-creator (adamw, 17:20:44) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380859 (adamw, 17:20:44) * Proposed Blocker, mediawriter, NEW (adamw, 17:20:44) * AGREED: 1380859 - RejectedBlocker (Final) - we don't think adding this Obsoletes: specifically would really resolve anything that could be described as a 'criteria violation'. however, we discussed some other cases which may be more suitable and will propose new blockers (adamw, 17:37:37) * (1379800) systemd does not create new machine-id file if none is present (adamw, 17:37:57) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379800 (adamw, 17:37:57) * Proposed Blocker, systemd, NEW (adamw, 17:37:57) * AGREED: 1379800 - RejectedBlocker (Final) - this would be a blocker, but it has been worked around in fedora-kickstarts by ensuring the images contain an empty file, so we do not actually need to block on it so long as that works (adamw, 17:53:39) * (1381327) LUC is presented as FMW in gnome-software (adamw, 17:54:42) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381327 (adamw, 17:54:45) * Proposed Blocker, liveusb-creator, NEW (adamw, 17:54:54) * AGREED: 1381327 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - this is accepted as a conditional violation of "Release-blocking live and dedicated installer images must boot when written to optical media of an appropriate size (if applicable) and when written to a USB stick with any of the officially supported methods", as we think we can live with the confusion for Beta but it's not acceptable for Final (adamw, 17:59:03) * (1379311) 15Gigs root partition maxSize not customisable in anaconda kickstart script (adamw, 18:01:09) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379311 (adamw, 18:01:12) * Proposed Blocker (Beta), anaconda, NEW (adamw, 18:01:35) * AGREED: 1379311 - RejectedBlocker (Beta) - so far as we can determine there is not even a bug here, let alone a blocker. It is just the intended behaviour: if you specify autopart in your kickstart, the exact result will differ between Fedora flavors. (adamw, 18:08:57) * Open floor (adamw, 18:10:07) Meeting ended at 18:21:01 UTC. Action Items ------------ Action Items, by person ----------------------- * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * adamw (247) * cmurf (73) * kparal (72) * sgallagh (35) * jkurik (32) * coremodule (25) * dgilmore (20) * pwhalen (17) * pschindl (15) * zodbot (9) * RaphGro (6) * jforbes (5) * nb (3) * garretraziel (2) * kushal (1) * pwhalen_ (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot