#fedora-blocker-review: F26-blocker-review

Meeting started by roshi at 16:01:03 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

  1. Roll Call (roshi, 16:01:03)
  2. Introduction (roshi, 16:03:31)
    1. Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (roshi, 16:03:31)
    2. We'll be following the process outlined at: (roshi, 16:03:35)
    3. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (roshi, 16:03:37)
    4. The bugs up for review today are available at: (roshi, 16:03:40)
    5. http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (roshi, 16:03:42)
    6. The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (roshi, 16:03:45)
    7. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Alpha_Release_Criteria (roshi, 16:03:47)
    8. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Beta_Release_Criteria (roshi, 16:03:50)
    9. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Final_Release_Criteria (roshi, 16:03:53)
    10. there's no proposals for Beta (roshi, 16:04:16)

  3. (1454854) DNF progress.start() broken with 2.5.0, breaking dnfdaemon (and dnfdragora) (roshi, 16:05:02)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1454854 (roshi, 16:05:05)
    2. Proposed Blocker, dnfdaemon, ON_QA (roshi, 16:05:10)
    3. AGREED: - RHBZ#1454854 - Punt - It's not 100% clear what is the default package manager for KDE, so we can't determine blocker status for this issue at this time. (roshi, 16:18:53)

  4. (1452866) FreeIPA upgrade script requires network to be up, but network is not up during upgrade when using dnf system-upgrade (roshi, 16:19:41)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1452866 (roshi, 16:19:44)
    2. Proposed Blocker, freeipa, NEW (roshi, 16:19:46)
    3. AGREED: - RHBZ#1452866 - Punt - It's still not 100% clear what the impact of this issue is, and we'll wait to determine blocker status until we have more information. (roshi, 16:24:40)

  5. (1450638) [abrt] gnome-font-viewer: gtk_header_bar_pack(): gnome-font-viewer killed by signal 11 (roshi, 16:24:48)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450638 (roshi, 16:24:51)
    2. Proposed Blocker, gnome-font-viewer, ON_QA (roshi, 16:24:53)
    3. AGREED: - RHBZ#1450638 - AcceptedBlocker - This bug is a violation of the following Final criterion: "All applications that can be launched using the standard graphical mechanism of a release-blocking desktop after a default installation of that desktop must start successfully and withstand a basic functionality test." (roshi, 16:29:46)

  6. (1454854) DNF progress.start() broken with 2.5.0, breaking dnfdaemon (and dnfdragora) (roshi, 16:31:06)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1454854 (roshi, 16:31:06)
    2. Proposed Blocker, dnfdaemon, ON_QA (roshi, 16:31:06)
    3. AGREED: - RHBZ#1454854 - AcceptedBlocker - Because this ships by default on KDE, it's a violation of the following criterion: "All applications that can be launched using the standard graphical mechanism of a release-blocking desktop after a default installation of that desktop must start successfully and withstand a basic functionality test." (roshi, 16:33:46)

  7. (1451914) [abrt] gnome-shell: GjsMaybeOwned<JS::Value>::trace(): gnome-shell killed by signal 6 (roshi, 16:34:01)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1451914 (roshi, 16:34:04)
    2. Proposed Blocker, gnome-shell, NEW (roshi, 16:34:07)
    3. AGREED: - RHBZ#1451914 - AcceptedBlocker - This bug is a violation of a few criteria, but notably "All applications that can be launched using the standard graphical mechanism of a release-blocking desktop after a default installation of that desktop must start successfully and withstand a basic functionality test." (roshi, 16:43:29)

  8. (1455673) GNOME Software should make sure system is current on updates before upgrading to new release (roshi, 16:43:40)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1455673 (roshi, 16:43:43)
    2. Proposed Blocker, gnome-software, NEW (roshi, 16:43:46)
    3. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/Prioritized_bugs_and_issues_-_the_process (sgallagh, 16:50:42)
    4. AGREED: - RHBZ#1455673 - RejectedBlocker - This bug doesn't violate any criteria, and is therefore non-blocking. While we agree with the intent, we'll propose this as a PrioritizedBug for review (as that seems the more appropriate venue). (roshi, 16:53:54)

  9. (1433884) SELinux is preventing (fwupd) from 'mounton' accesses on the directory /var/lib/fwupd. (roshi, 16:54:02)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433884 (roshi, 16:54:05)
    2. Proposed Blocker, selinux-policy, NEW (roshi, 16:54:07)
    3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1429341https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1429341 (adamw, 16:57:11)
    4. AGREED: - RHBZ#1433884 - Punt - It looks like this is already fixed in build 3.13.1-247. Please retest and update the bug. (jkurik, 17:02:22)

  10. (1449643) Running groupadd produces AVC denials about net_admin and write to system_dbusd_var_run_t (roshi, 17:02:35)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449643 (roshi, 17:02:38)
    2. Proposed Blocker, selinux-policy, POST (roshi, 17:02:40)
    3. AGREED: - RHBZ#1449643 - AcceptedBlocker - This bug violates the following criterion: "There must be no SELinux denial notifications or crash notifications on boot of or during installation from a release-blocking live image, or at first login after a default install of a release-blocking desktop." (roshi, 17:07:19)

  11. Open Floor (roshi, 17:07:25)


Meeting ended at 17:11:18 UTC (full logs).

Action items

  1. (none)


People present (lines said)

  1. roshi (144)
  2. adamw (75)
  3. kparal (44)
  4. jkurik (38)
  5. Kevin_Kofler (14)
  6. linuxmodder (10)
  7. zodbot (9)
  8. Pharaoh_Atem (7)
  9. pschindl_wfh (4)
  10. dgilmore (3)
  11. sgallagh (2)
  12. nathan95 (1)
  13. tflink (0)


Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.