#fedora-blocker-review: F26-blocker-review
Meeting started by adamw at 16:03:37 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- Roll Call (adamw, 16:03:37)
- Introduction (adamw, 16:11:40)
- Our purpose in this meeting is to review
proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept
them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted
blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (adamw,
16:11:40)
- We'll be following the process outlined
at: (adamw,
16:11:40)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
(adamw,
16:11:41)
- The bugs up for review today are available
at: (adamw,
16:11:41)
- http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current
(adamw,
16:11:43)
- The criteria for release blocking bugs can be
found at: (adamw,
16:11:47)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Alpha_Release_Criteria
(adamw,
16:11:49)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Beta_Release_Criteria
(adamw,
16:11:51)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Final_Release_Criteria
(adamw,
16:11:53)
- 7 Proposed Blockers (adamw,
16:12:08)
- 4 Accepted Blockers (adamw,
16:12:08)
- 1 Proposed Freeze Exception (adamw,
16:12:13)
- (1443662) installation problems with repos accessed via NFS (roshi, 16:16:48)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1443662
(roshi,
16:16:51)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (roshi,
16:16:53)
- AGREED: -
RHBZ#1443662 - Punt - We need some more information on how
reproducible this is before we can make a decision on blocker
status. (roshi,
16:31:23)
- (1443930) GLib.GError: nm-device-error-quark: This device is not active (4) (roshi, 16:31:36)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1443930
(roshi,
16:31:39)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (roshi,
16:31:42)
- AGREED: -
RHBZ#1443930 - RejectedBlocker - This doesn't actually violate any
of the Release Criteria so it's rejected as a blocker. (roshi,
16:52:23)
- (1462825) Aanconda bug reporting dialog is missing important log files & full treceback file (roshi, 16:52:49)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1462825
(roshi,
16:52:52)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (roshi,
16:52:54)
- AGREED: -
RHBZ#1462825 - AcceptedBlocker - This bug is a clear violation of
the following Alpha criterion: "The installer must be able to report
failures to Bugzilla, with appropriate information included."
(roshi,
16:57:18)
- (1463297) Server install fails on armhfp - "/boot file system cannot be of type xfs" (roshi, 16:57:22)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1463297
(roshi,
16:57:26)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED
(roshi,
16:57:28)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/26/ReleaseBlocking?rd=Fedora_Program_Management/ReleaseBlocking/Fedora26#Server
(kparal,
16:59:49)
- AGREED: -
RHBZ#1463297 - RejectedBlocker AcceptedFreezeException - This bug
doesn't affect any release blocking media for ARM, so is rejected as
a blocker. However, it'd be great to get a fix in for this if we
can, so granting FE status. (roshi,
17:05:39)
- (1464297) anaconda is disabling ipv6 even though not asked to (roshi, 17:05:54)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464297
(roshi,
17:05:57)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED
(roshi,
17:05:59)
- AGREED: -
RHBZ#1464297 - AcceptedBlocker - This bug conditionally violates a
plethora of criteria when using ipv6, which is becoming more
common. (roshi,
17:11:00)
- (1462444) [abrt] gnome-shell: std::_Rb_tree<_ConnectData*, _ConnectData*, std::_Identity<_ConnectData*>, std::less<_ConnectData*>, std::allocator<_ConnectData*> >::equal_range(): gnome-shell killed by signal 11 (roshi, 17:12:38)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1462444
(roshi,
17:12:42)
- Proposed Blocker, gjs, NEW (roshi,
17:12:45)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1462444#c23
is the note from last week's meeting on this (adamw,
17:15:04)
- AGREED: -
RHBZ#1462444 - Punt - It's still unclear how many people will hit
this. We'll revisit next week when we have more information.
(roshi,
17:21:17)
- (1448891) Boxes crashes on start (roshi, 17:21:26)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448891
(roshi,
17:21:26)
- Proposed Blocker, gnome-boxes, NEW (roshi,
17:21:27)
- AGREED: -
RHBZ#1448891 - RejectedBlocker - This bug doesn't seem to be a
generic crash Boxes has by default, but with something local. If
more people run into this issue, please re-propose as this being
widespread would be considered a blocker. (roshi,
17:28:55)
- (1447708) cloud-init package module fails with python NameError exception (roshi, 17:29:10)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447708
(roshi,
17:29:13)
- Proposed Freeze Exceptions, cloud-init,
ON_QA (roshi,
17:29:15)
- https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-1912218b0c
(roshi,
17:31:37)
- AGREED: -
RHBZ#1447708 - AcceptedFreezeException - It'd be good to have this
fixed at release. Thanks for the tested fix. (roshi,
17:34:11)
- Open Floor (roshi, 17:34:15)
- Blocker Status email to be sent sometime this
week (roshi,
17:36:35)
Meeting ended at 17:37:15 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- (none)
People present (lines said)
- roshi (136)
- adamw (120)
- kparal (39)
- jkurik (30)
- pwhalen (7)
- zodbot (6)
- garretraziel (2)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.