#fedora-blocker-review: F27-blocker-review
Meeting started by kparal at 16:00:03 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- Roll Call (kparal, 16:00:03)
- Introduction (kparal, 16:06:50)
- Our purpose in this meeting is to review
proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept
them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted
blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (kparal,
16:06:51)
- We'll be following the process outlined
at: (kparal,
16:06:51)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
(kparal,
16:06:51)
- The bugs up for review today are available
at: (kparal,
16:06:52)
- http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current
(kparal,
16:06:54)
- The criteria for release blocking bugs can be
found at: (kparal,
16:06:56)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Alpha_Release_Criteria
(kparal,
16:06:58)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Beta_Release_Criteria
(kparal,
16:07:02)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Final_Release_Criteria
(kparal,
16:07:04)
- 9 Proposed Blockers (kparal,
16:07:13)
- 6 Accepted Blockers (kparal,
16:07:14)
- 0 Accepted 0-day Blockers (kparal,
16:07:14)
- 0 Accepted Previous Release Blockers
(kparal,
16:07:14)
- 3 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (kparal,
16:07:14)
- 0 Accepted Freeze Exceptions (kparal,
16:07:16)
- (1491320) heavy screen flicker with latest kernels in qxl+spice VM (kparal, 16:07:37)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491320
(kparal,
16:07:37)
- Proposed Blocker, kernel, NEW (kparal,
16:07:37)
- https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196777#c11
(jforbes,
16:12:22)
- AGREED: - #1491320 -
AcceptedBlocker (Final) - This violates "The release must be able
host virtual guest instances of the same release" criterion.
Affected parties, please find a solution here. (kparal,
16:25:44)
- (1484916) Can not get destinations from CUPS server (kparal, 16:25:56)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484916
(kparal,
16:25:56)
- Proposed Blocker, cups, MODIFIED (kparal,
16:25:56)
- AGREED: - #1484916 -
AcceptedBlocker (Final) - This violates "All applications that can
be launched using the standard graphical mechanism of a
release-blocking desktop after a default installation of that
desktop must start successfully and withstand a basic functionality
test" for control center app and showing printers. (kparal,
16:33:39)
- (1490832) dnf system-upgrade: dnf.exceptions.MarkingError: no package matched (kparal, 16:33:50)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490832
(kparal,
16:33:50)
- Proposed Blocker, dnf-plugins-extras,
MODIFIED (kparal,
16:33:51)
- AGREED: - #1490832 -
AcceptedBlocker (Final) - This violates "For each one of the
release-blocking package sets, it must be possible to successfully
complete a direct upgrade from fully updated installations of the
last two stable Fedora releases with that package set installed."
when --enablerepo is used. (kparal,
16:38:30)
- (1492036) system-upgrade fails to connect to online mirrors during upgrade when caches are missing (kparal, 16:38:43)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1492036
(kparal,
16:38:43)
- Proposed Blocker, dnf-plugins-extras,
MODIFIED (kparal,
16:38:43)
- AGREED: - #1492036 -
Punt (delay decision) - We'll wait until this is confirmed by
multiple parties or more ways to trigger this are found.
(kparal,
16:43:17)
- (1495635) systemd times out when waiting to unlock disks, falling to dracut shell (kparal, 16:43:29)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1495635
(kparal,
16:43:29)
- Proposed Blocker, dracut, POST (kparal,
16:43:29)
- AGREED: - #1495635 -
AcceptedBlocker (Final) - This violates boot-related criteria when
the system is encrypted and is not unlocked quickly enough.
(kparal,
16:47:01)
- (1494061) gnome-software doesn't show F25->F27 upgrade even though it should (kparal, 16:47:12)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494061
(kparal,
16:47:12)
- Proposed Blocker, gnome-software, NEW
(kparal,
16:47:12)
- AGREED: - #1494061 -
AcceptedBlocker (Final) - This violates "For each one of the
release-blocking package sets, it must be possible to successfully
complete a direct upgrade from fully updated installations of the
last two stable Fedora releases with that package set installed."
for gnome-software on F25. (kparal,
16:53:34)
- (1479932) gi.overrides.BlockDev.LVMError: Process reported exit code 5: Volume group "VolGroup00" not found (kparal, 16:53:46)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1479932
(kparal,
16:53:46)
- Proposed Blocker, libblockdev, NEW (kparal,
16:53:47)
- AGREED: - #1479932 -
Punt (delay decision) - We'll wait until this has detailed
reproduction steps and somebody else manages to successfully
reproduce it. (kparal,
16:56:18)
- (1482692) gi.overrides.BlockDev.LVMError: Failed to call the 'Activate' method on the '/com/redhat/lvmdbus1/Lv/0' object: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Python.dbus.exceptions.DBusException: ('com.redhat.lvmdbus1.Lv', 'Exit code 5, stderr = Volume group ... (kparal, 16:56:28)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482692
(kparal,
16:56:29)
- Proposed Blocker, libblockdev, NEW (kparal,
16:56:29)
- AGREED: - #1482692 -
Punt (delay decision) - We'll wait until this has detailed
reproduction steps and somebody else manages to successfully
reproduce it. (kparal,
16:58:09)
- (1475565) initramfs not generated at default location if /boot/<machine-id> exists (kparal, 16:58:16)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475565
(kparal,
16:58:17)
- Proposed Blocker, systemd, NEW (kparal,
16:58:17)
- AGREED: - #1475565 -
Punt (delay decision) - We need to perform more testing to estimate
the user impact better. (kparal,
17:07:41)
- Proposed FEs (kparal,
17:08:23)
- (1497458) implantisomd5sum fails to implant on 32 bit x86 (kparal, 17:09:04)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1497458
(kparal,
17:09:04)
- Proposed Freeze Exceptions, isomd5sum,
NEW (kparal,
17:09:05)
- AGREED: - #1497458 -
AcceptedFreezeException (Final) - We prefer to release i686 images
with working checksums, as long as the fix is not invasive and
doesn't break anything else. (kparal,
17:11:43)
- (1475565) initramfs not generated at default location if /boot/<machine-id> exists (kparal, 17:12:50)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475565
(kparal,
17:12:50)
- Proposed Blocker, systemd, NEW (kparal,
17:12:50)
- Open floor (kparal, 17:19:14)
Meeting ended at 17:25:48 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- (none)
People present (lines said)
- kparal (206)
- tflink (40)
- lbrabec (22)
- jforbes (21)
- pschindl (16)
- pwhalen (13)
- mboddu (10)
- zodbot (7)
- sumantrom[m] (5)
- mclasen (4)
- nb (4)
- mattdm (2)
- ignatenkobrain (1)
- zdohnal (1)
- d0minicpg (1)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.