#fedora-blocker-review: F30-blocker-review
Meeting started by adamw at 17:13:39 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- Roll Call (adamw, 17:13:39)
- coremodule will secretarialize (adamw,
17:19:26)
- Introduction (adamw, 17:19:45)
- Our purpose in this meeting is to review
proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept
them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted
blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (adamw,
17:19:45)
- We'll be following the process outlined
at: (adamw,
17:19:46)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
(adamw,
17:19:46)
- The bugs up for review today are available
at: (adamw,
17:19:48)
- http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current
(adamw,
17:19:50)
- The criteria for release blocking bugs can be
found at: (adamw,
17:19:52)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Basic_Release_Criteria
(adamw,
17:19:54)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Beta_Release_Criteria
(adamw,
17:19:56)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Final_Release_Criteria
(adamw,
17:19:58)
- 4 Proposed Blockers (Beta) (adamw,
17:20:10)
- 4 Proposed Blockers (Final) (adamw,
17:20:28)
- Proposed Beta blockers (adamw, 17:22:02)
- (1672761) segfault during boot of netinstall image (adamw, 17:22:09)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672761
(adamw,
17:22:09)
- Proposed Blocker, device-mapper-multipath,
MODIFIED (adamw,
17:22:09)
- https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/overview?distri=fedora&version=Rawhide&build=Fedora-Rawhide-20190205.n.0&groupid=1
(adamw,
17:24:44)
- AGREED: 1672761 -
AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - we believe this crash will occur commonly
enough to accept it as a Beta blocker per "All release-blocking
images must boot in their supported configurations". It is believed
fixed, but not yet fully confirmed, so we will accept it in case any
issues remain (adamw,
17:29:16)
- (1616167) dnf doesn't record modular metadata in a local database (adamw, 17:29:27)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616167
(adamw,
17:29:28)
- Proposed Blocker, dnf, NEW (adamw,
17:29:28)
- AGREED: 1616167 -
punt to FESCo - as we did for Fedora 29, due to the issues with
delivery time on this bug, we will pass this to FESCo to decide what
the requirements should be for F30 Beta and Final (adamw,
17:36:40)
- (1672683) [ebtables] build option breaks service firewalld (adamw, 17:36:53)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672683
(adamw,
17:36:54)
- Proposed Blocker, ebtables, ASSIGNED
(adamw,
17:36:54)
- AGREED: 1672683 -
AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - accepted as a blocker per Basic criterion
"...Supported install-time firewall configuration options must work
correctly." (adamw,
17:45:33)
- (1666868) NFS install fails with kernel "invalid creds" traceback (adamw, 17:45:49)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666868
(adamw,
17:45:49)
- Proposed Blocker, kernel, NEW (adamw,
17:45:49)
- AGREED: 1666868 -
AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - accepted as a clear violation of "When
using the dedicated installer images, the installer must be able to
use HTTP, FTP and NFS repositories as package sources" (adamw,
17:50:47)
- Proposed Final blockers (adamw, 17:51:19)
- that was all proposed Beta blockers, moving
onto proposed Final blockers (adamw,
17:51:28)
- (1648268) Drag and Drop from file-roller Does not work on Wayland (adamw, 17:51:37)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648268
(adamw,
17:51:37)
- Proposed Blocker, file-roller, NEW (adamw,
17:51:37)
- vote tally (including votes from previous
meeting) currently at +4 / -3 (adamw,
17:59:23)
- AGREED: 1648268 -
punt (delay decision) - there still isn't a clear consensus on this
(current vote total at +4 / -4) so we will delay once again, and try
to ping desktop team for more info and hopefully a fix (adamw,
18:09:40)
- (1674167) __libc_free: gnome-control-center killed by SIGSEGV (adamw, 18:09:49)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1674167
(adamw,
18:09:49)
- Proposed Blocker, gnome-control-center,
NEW (adamw,
18:09:49)
- AGREED: 1648268 -
AcceptedBlocker (Final) - accepted as a violation of "All
applications that can be launched using the standard graphical
mechanism of a release-blocking desktop after a default installation
of that desktop must start successfully and withstand a basic
functionality test" (adamw,
18:16:01)
- (1666920) iSCSI installs fail to boot since systemd-240 (Fedora-Rawhide-20181222.n.1) (adamw, 18:16:08)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666920
(adamw,
18:16:08)
- Proposed Blocker, systemd, NEW (adamw,
18:16:08)
- AGREED: 1666920 -
AcceptedBlocker (Final) - accepted as a violation of "The installer
must be able to detect (if possible) and install to supported
network-attached storage devices...Supported network-attached
storage types include iSCSI, Fibre Channel and Fibre Channel over
Ethernet (FCoE)." (adamw,
18:22:20)
- (1674045) Upgrade from F29 to Rawhide (F30) hangs at end, showing "Upgrade complete! Cleaning up and rebooting..." (adamw, 18:22:29)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1674045
(adamw,
18:22:29)
- Proposed Blocker, systemd, NEW (adamw,
18:22:29)
- AGREED: 1675045 -
AcceptedBlocker (Final) - accepted as violation of "For each one of
the release-blocking package sets, it must be possible to
successfully complete a direct upgrade from a fully updated, clean
default installation of each of the last two stable Fedora releases
with that package set installed", reasoning per comment #2
(adamw,
18:26:54)
- End of proposed blockers (adamw, 18:27:03)
- there's only one accepted Beta blocker and it
doesn't really need checking, so onto open floor! (adamw,
18:27:18)
- Open floor (adamw, 18:27:20)
Meeting ended at 18:38:10 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- (none)
People present (lines said)
- adamw (153)
- cmurf (46)
- frantisekz (36)
- sgallagh (30)
- bcotton (17)
- coremodule (17)
- zodbot (14)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.