#fedora-blocker-review: F30-blocker-review

Meeting started by adamw at 16:04:06 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

  1. Roll Call (adamw, 16:04:06)
  2. Introduction (adamw, 16:09:09)
    1. Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (adamw, 16:09:10)
    2. We'll be following the process outlined at: (adamw, 16:09:10)
    3. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (adamw, 16:09:10)
    4. The bugs up for review today are available at: (adamw, 16:09:11)
    5. http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (adamw, 16:09:13)
    6. The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (adamw, 16:09:15)
    7. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Basic_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:09:17)
    8. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Beta_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:09:19)
    9. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Final_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:09:21)
    10. coremodule will secretarialize (adamw, 16:09:27)
    11. 4 Proposed Blockers (Beta) (adamw, 16:12:46)
    12. 4 Accepted Blockers (Beta) (adamw, 16:12:51)
    13. 6 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (Beta) (adamw, 16:12:57)
    14. starting with proposed Beta blockers (adamw, 16:13:19)

  3. (1652806) after move to bls grub can't find blscfg (adamw, 16:13:26)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1652806 (adamw, 16:13:26)
    2. Proposed Blocker, grub2, ON_QA (adamw, 16:13:26)
    3. AGREED: 1652806 - AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - there's some uncertainty around precisely what bug(s) the reporter here has, and in what configuration they appear, versus what the claimed fix in the package actually does. But we at least agree that it seems worth taking as an FE, and will ask Javier for more details in the bug (adamw, 16:21:29)

  4. (1685992) Network spoke doesn't appear on ARM initial-setup (adamw, 16:21:36)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685992 (adamw, 16:21:37)
    2. Proposed Blocker, initial-setup, POST (adamw, 16:21:37)
    3. ACCEPTED: 1685992 - RejectedBlocker (Beta), AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - the network spoke is more a convenience than a vital feature of i-s in this workflow, and there is no criterion requiring it to be present or work. however, this is obviously a significant bug that cannot be fixed with an update (adamw, 16:34:39)

  5. (1686636) podman cannot be installed due to dependency on conmon (subpackage of retired / moved to module cri-o) (adamw, 16:34:48)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686636 (adamw, 16:34:49)
    2. Proposed Blocker, podman, NEW (adamw, 16:34:49)
    3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686926 (adamw, 16:35:45)
    4. https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20190306.n.1/compose/Server/aarch64/ (adamw, 16:39:30)
    5. https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20190310.n.2/compose/Server/armhfp/images/ exists , doesn't exist for 0306.n.1. (adamw, 16:40:22)
    6. sgallagh correctly points out that this should have been an automatic blocker, as it prevents the build of release-blocking images, the Server disk images for aarch64 and armhfp (adamw, 16:40:57)
    7. we will mark it as an accepted blocker and move on (adamw, 16:41:14)

  6. (1686919) Issues with cloud/iot images due to not being able to specify msdos partitions when underlying host is booted with UEFI (adamw, 16:45:16)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686919 (adamw, 16:45:16)
    2. Proposed Blocker, python-blivet, ON_QA (adamw, 16:45:16)
    3. https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8197 (adamw, 16:54:37)
    4. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686919#c10 is my explanation (adamw, 17:02:39)
    5. AGREED: 1686919 - AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - we accept this bug as a blocker as a violation of basic criterion "...Release-blocking cloud images must boot in the Fedora OpenStack Cloud and in Amazon EC2." to be clear, we block on the images not booting: if UEFI-on-MBR cannot be made to work, reverting to BIOS-on-MBR would also resolve the blocker. (adamw, 17:10:57)

  7. Proposed Beta freeze exceptions (adamw, 17:12:51)
    1. we now move on to proposed Beta freeze exceptions (adamw, 17:12:58)

  8. (1678453) Firefox Wayland By Default On Gnome (adamw, 17:13:36)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678453 (adamw, 17:13:36)
    2. Proposed Freeze Exceptions, Changes Tracking, MODIFIED (adamw, 17:13:36)
    3. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/146#note_403457 (adamw, 17:17:20)
    4. AGREED: 1678453 - AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - we are concerned about the gnome-shell issue and the late ff66 release date here, but it makes no sense to deny an FE for those reasons but take the Change post-Beta. so we grant it an FE, but will ask FESCo if it still thinks the Change should land in F30 at all given those considerations (adamw, 17:27:15)

  9. (1674809) digikam: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f30 (adamw, 17:27:30)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1674809 (adamw, 17:27:30)
    2. Proposed Freeze Exceptions, digikam, ON_QA (adamw, 17:27:30)
    3. AGREED: 1674809 - AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - on the grounds that the existing package cannot be installed due to broken dependencies, we accept this as an FE (fixing broken dependencies in the stable package set is usually a good idea) (adamw, 17:37:43)

  10. (1685939) Include GNOME 3.31.92 in Fedora 30 Beta (adamw, 17:37:51)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685939 (adamw, 17:37:51)
    2. Proposed Freeze Exceptions, distribution, ON_QA (adamw, 17:37:52)
    3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687549 (kalev, 17:39:21)
    4. AGREED: 1685939 - AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - as usual, we're generally inclined to accept FEs for newer pre-releases of the GNOME version we want to include in the final release. We still have some time till Beta release, and this has tested out well in manual and automated testing so far (adamw, 17:44:36)

  11. (1652806) after move to bls grub can't find blscfg (adamw, 17:44:45)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1652806 (adamw, 17:44:46)
    2. Proposed Freeze Exceptions, grub2, ON_QA (adamw, 17:44:46)
    3. we accepted this as an FE during blocker review (adamw, 17:45:17)

  12. (1687085) bootloader crashes early when it is compiled with gcc9 (adamw, 17:45:24)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687085 (adamw, 17:45:24)
    2. Proposed Freeze Exceptions, s390utils, ON_QA (adamw, 17:45:24)
    3. AGREED: 1687085 - AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - this prevents all installs from booting on a non-blocking arch (s390), obviously a clear freeze exception (adamw, 17:51:58)

  13. (1686053) Bump GNOME screen cast API compatibility (adamw, 17:52:07)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686053 (adamw, 17:52:07)
    2. Proposed Freeze Exceptions, xdg-desktop-portal-gtk, ON_QA (adamw, 17:52:07)
    3. AGREED: 1686053 - AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - this doesn't seem like a deal-breaking feature, but the risk seems equally low and the issue can't be fixed for live images with an update, so accepted as an FE (adamw, 17:57:57)

  14. (1687549) Include GNOME 3.32.0 in Fedora 30 Beta (adamw, 17:58:18)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687549 (adamw, 17:58:19)
    2. Proposed Freeze Exceptions, distribution, NEW (adamw, 17:58:19)
    3. AGREED: 1687549 - AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - this is accepted on the same reasoning as the 3.31.92 FE. As there is no update yet, of course this can only be pushed if it lands in reasonable time and no major issues appear in manual or automated testing (adamw, 18:04:47)

  15. (1687508) F30-beta-FE for setup-2.13.2-1.fc30 (adamw, 18:05:03)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687508 (adamw, 18:05:03)
    2. Proposed Freeze Exceptions, setup, NEW (adamw, 18:05:03)
    3. https://pagure.io/setup/c/3553a1ae48c7b6e38f6599e45e88d6457c225876?branch=master (adamw, 18:06:42)
    4. https://pagure.io/setup/c/fef4c093aec7adef9a2ced5b374a3c3354901e10?branch=master (adamw, 18:06:49)
    5. https://pagure.io/setup/c/96eb9d6aae09e6207c611a02ab26413f3cd9ff18?branch=master (adamw, 18:06:55)
    6. AGREED: 1687508 - AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - we're a bit reluctant to fiddle around with critical shell script in a freeze, but as this relates to a Change and there's still a couple of weeks to release, we're willing to take the risk (adamw, 18:14:08)

  16. Accepted Beta blockers (adamw, 18:15:02)
    1. most blockers are in a fairly straightforward state. 1673710 , 1656509 and 1686636 are waiting on the developers to fix them, 1684612 is awaiting verification with the next compose that all release-blocking images have new backgrounds (adamw, 18:16:34)

  17. (1683197) gdm Fails to load with "nomodeset" (adamw, 18:16:45)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1683197 (adamw, 18:16:45)
    2. Accepted Blocker, xorg-x11-server, NEW (adamw, 18:16:45)
    3. we're a little concerned here that this may turn out not to be strictly a 'fixable' bug and may require some kind of change to the whole 'basic graphics' concept and criteria, but we will work on that with graphics and desktop folks (adamw, 18:25:13)

  18. Open floor (adamw, 18:32:50)
    1. F30 composes are still failing for various reasons, most recently failures seem to be network-related, releng is trying to fix them (adamw, 18:38:12)
    2. https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/361200 (adamw, 18:39:56)
    3. https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/361200/file/_check_install_source-packaging.log (adamw, 18:40:00)


Meeting ended at 18:47:04 UTC (full logs).

Action items

  1. (none)


People present (lines said)

  1. adamw (300)
  2. cmurf (84)
  3. frantisekz (49)
  4. lruzicka (48)
  5. jlanda (44)
  6. pwhalen (40)
  7. kalev (33)
  8. sgallagh (22)
  9. zodbot (13)
  10. bcotton (11)
  11. contyk (6)
  12. coremodule (5)
  13. nirik (3)
  14. satellit (1)
  15. mkolman (1)


Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.