#fedora-blocker-review: F34-blocker-review
Meeting started by adamw at 17:00:59 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- Roll Call (adamw, 17:01:09)
- Introduction (adamw, 17:06:03)
- Our purpose in this meeting is to review
proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept
them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted
blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (adamw,
17:06:14)
- We'll be following the process outlined
at: (adamw,
17:06:19)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
(adamw,
17:06:25)
- The bugs up for review today are available
at: (adamw,
17:06:29)
- http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current
(adamw,
17:06:35)
- The criteria for release blocking bugs can be
found at: (adamw,
17:06:40)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Basic_Release_Criteria
(adamw,
17:06:45)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Beta_Release_Criteria
(adamw,
17:06:49)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Final_Release_Criteria
(adamw,
17:06:55)
- for Beta, we have: (adamw,
17:07:14)
- 1 Proposed Blockers (adamw,
17:07:14)
- 3 Accepted Blockers (adamw,
17:07:20)
- 7 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (adamw,
17:07:24)
- 12 Accepted Freeze Exceptions (adamw,
17:07:24)
- for Final, we have: (adamw,
17:07:34)
- 2 Proposed Blockers (adamw,
17:07:41)
- 5 Accepted Blockers (adamw,
17:07:41)
- coremodule will secretarialize (adamw,
17:07:46)
- Proposed Beta blocker (adamw, 17:07:55)
- (1936288) multiple user space crashes are assigned to kernel-core and cannot be reported (adamw, 17:09:40)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936288
(adamw,
17:09:44)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/286
(adamw,
17:09:49)
- Proposed Blocker, gnome-abrt, NEW (adamw,
17:09:52)
- AGREED: 1936288 -
RejectedBlocker (Beta) - this is definitely a case abrt should
handle better, but it's not new and we know the bounds of it quite
well (GPFs), it's not broad enough to block a release (adamw,
17:20:46)
- Proposed Beta freeze exceptions (adamw, 17:22:51)
- (1934149) F34FailsToInstall: 0ad (adamw, 17:23:25)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934149
(adamw,
17:23:30)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/277
(adamw,
17:23:33)
- Proposed Freeze Exceptions, 0ad,
VERIFIED (adamw,
17:23:37)
- AGREED: we will treat
this bug as a proxy for all five proposed 'fails to install'
bugs (adamw,
17:24:57)
- AGREED: 1934149,
1924284, 1924317, 1924319, 1924321 AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) -
we agree that an FE is generally merited if a package fails to
install due to the impact on people upgrading from previous stable
releases, likely without updates-testing enabled. However, fixes
will only be pushed if they involve minimal change and don't seem
likely to endanger compose of release-blocking images (adamw,
17:40:44)
- (1930567) ESP's "forwarding" grub.cfg doesn't contain $boot FS UUID when it's btrfs (adamw, 17:40:54)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1930567
(adamw,
17:41:01)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/285
(adamw,
17:41:05)
- Proposed Freeze Exceptions, anaconda,
NEW (adamw,
17:41:09)
- AGREED: 1930567 -
AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - this is accepted as it has the same
effect as 1928588 , which was already accepted. It's a significant
installer issue that can't be resolved with an update (adamw,
17:50:16)
- (1930401) No update notifications shown when updates available (F34, Rawhide) (adamw, 17:50:54)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1930401
(adamw,
17:50:58)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/234
(adamw,
17:51:03)
- Proposed Freeze Exceptions, gnome-software,
POST (adamw,
17:51:09)
- AGREED: 1930401 -
AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - failing to notify of available
updates is a significant issue, it can be fixed with an update but
of course...there's a catch-22 there :D (adamw,
17:59:43)
- that's all the proposed FEs, moving on
to: (adamw,
17:59:56)
- Proposed Final blockerss (adamw, 18:00:45)
- (1930567) ESP's "forwarding" grub.cfg doesn't contain $boot FS UUID when it's btrfs (adamw, 18:01:07)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1930567
(adamw,
18:01:13)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/285
(adamw,
18:01:18)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (adamw,
18:01:21)
- AGREED: 1930567 -
AcceptedBlocker (Final) - this seems like a clear violation of "The
installer must be able to create and install to any workable
partition layout using any file system and/or container format
combination offered in a default installer configuration" combined
with the Basic "installed system must boot" criteria (adamw,
18:08:42)
- (1930401) No update notifications shown when updates available (F34, Rawhide) (adamw, 18:09:01)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1930401
(adamw,
18:09:06)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/234
(adamw,
18:09:12)
- Proposed Blocker, gnome-software, POST
(adamw,
18:09:16)
- AGREED: 1930401 -
AcceptedBlocker (Final) - since we determined there is a bug here
preventing notifications from being shown, this is a clear violation
of Final criterion "Release-blocking desktops must notify the user
of available updates, but must not do so when running as a live
image." (adamw,
18:14:43)
- Accepted Beta blockers (adamw, 18:15:01)
- (1930977) [abrt] gnome-shell: nouveau_fence_signalled(): gnome-shell killed by SIGSEGV (adamw, 18:16:15)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1930977
(adamw,
18:16:20)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/241
(adamw,
18:16:26)
- Accepted Blocker, mesa, ASSIGNED (adamw,
18:16:30)
- there basically is a fix for this, we just need
to sort out the Fedora process side of things (maintainer is not
clear on what's needed for the package) (adamw,
18:20:54)
- ACTION: adamw to move
1930977 forward with the packager (adamw,
18:21:02)
- (1933433) systemd-resolved: stub resolver is not following CNAME for resolution (adamw, 18:22:41)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933433
(adamw,
18:22:46)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/261
(adamw,
18:22:53)
- Accepted Blocker, systemd, MODIFIED
(adamw,
18:22:57)
- there is an update for this in testing which is
generally reported to solve things, a reporter has suggested there's
still an issue in the bug, but it doesn't seem to be really the same
problem (adamw,
18:23:35)
- update is pending stable, only needs pushing,
will happen shortly (adamw,
18:27:37)
- (1933454) /etc/resolv.conf is not a symlink (adamw, 18:27:47)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933454
(adamw,
18:27:52)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/265
(adamw,
18:27:58)
- Accepted Blocker, systemd, NEW (adamw,
18:28:04)
- several possible resolutions have been
discussed in the bug, we need to pick one and do it (adamw,
18:29:12)
- ACTION: adamw to poke
people to pick and implement a fix for 1933454 (adamw,
18:31:55)
- Open floor (adamw, 18:33:26)
- https://paste.centos.org/view/9552c3d6
(cmurf,
18:50:48)
- https://paste.centos.org/view/334618d0
(cmurf,
18:51:53)
Meeting ended at 19:03:31 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- adamw to move 1930977 forward with the packager
- adamw to poke people to pick and implement a fix for 1933454
Action items, by person
- adamw
- adamw to move 1930977 forward with the packager
- adamw to poke people to pick and implement a fix for 1933454
People present (lines said)
- adamw (168)
- cmurf (62)
- lruzicka[m] (41)
- pwhalen (18)
- bcotton (13)
- coremodule (13)
- zodbot (10)
- lruzicka (6)
- Eighth_Doctor (3)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.