#fedora-blocker-review: F39-blocker-review
Meeting started by adamw at 16:00:40 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- Roll Call (adamw, 16:00:46)
- Introduction (adamw, 16:06:10)
- Our purpose in this meeting is to review
proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept
them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted
blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (adamw,
16:06:10)
- We'll be following the process outlined
at: (adamw,
16:06:10)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
(adamw,
16:06:10)
- The bugs up for review today are available
at: (adamw,
16:06:12)
- http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current
(adamw,
16:06:14)
- The criteria for release blocking bugs can be
found at: (adamw,
16:06:16)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Basic_Release_Criteria
(adamw,
16:06:18)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Beta_Release_Criteria
(adamw,
16:06:20)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Final_Release_Criteria
(adamw,
16:06:24)
- for Beta, we have: (adamw,
16:06:26)
- 3 Proposed Blockers (adamw,
16:06:28)
- 7 Accepted Blockers (adamw,
16:06:30)
- 2 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (adamw,
16:06:32)
- 31 Accepted Freeze Exceptions (adamw,
16:06:34)
- for Final, we have: (adamw,
16:06:36)
- 4 Proposed Blockers (adamw,
16:06:42)
- 2 Accepted Blockers (adamw,
16:06:42)
- frantisekz will secretarialize (adamw,
16:08:03)
- Proposed Beta blockers (adamw, 16:08:15)
- (2234518) webUI: allows you to enter an encryption passphrase in non-ASCII characters with no warning (adamw, 16:08:30)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2234518
(adamw,
16:08:30)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1193
(adamw,
16:08:30)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, POST (adamw,
16:08:31)
- Ticket vote: BetaBlocker (+3,0,-4) (+tflink,
+nielsenb, +lruzicka, -geraldosimiao, -imsedgar, -kparal,
-bcotton) (adamw,
16:08:31)
- Ticket vote: BetaFreezeException (+1,0,-0)
(+adamwill) (adamw,
16:08:33)
- AGREED: 2234518 -
RejectedBlocker (Beta) AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - we agreed
that anaconda not displaying a warning here is not in itself serious
enough to be a blocker bug, but fixing it would be useful. The
libblockdev crash and gnome-initial-setup keyboard layout selection
issues are being addressed separately (adamw,
16:18:29)
- (2234640) Installer webUI doesn't allow to install system without separate boot partition (adamw, 16:18:42)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2234640
(adamw,
16:18:42)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1249
(adamw,
16:18:42)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (adamw,
16:18:42)
- Ticket vote: BetaBlocker (+2,0,-2)
(+geraldosimiao, +bcotton, -kparal, -lruzicka) (adamw,
16:18:42)
- Ticket vote: BetaFreezeException (+2,0,-0)
(+kparal, +lruzicka) (adamw,
16:18:44)
- AGREED: 2234640 -
RejectedBlocker (Beta) AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - this does
not really violate any Beta criteria, though we see significant
concerns with whether it's appropriate for anaconda to suddenly
start enforcing a requirement for a separate /boot when it did not
previously. Accepted as an FE - if we do change this, it makes sense
to do so for Beta, not change it between Beta and Final.
(adamw,
16:32:32)
- (2235236) CVE-2023-30079 libeconf: Stack overflow in function read_file at atlibeconf/lib/getfilecontents.c [fedora-all] (adamw, 16:32:50)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235236
(adamw,
16:32:50)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1253
(adamw,
16:32:50)
- Proposed Blocker, libeconf, MODIFIED
(adamw,
16:32:50)
- Ticket vote: BetaBlocker (+2,0,-1)
(+geraldosimiao, +lruzicka, -adamwill) (adamw,
16:32:50)
- Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+2,0,-0) (+bcotton,
+adamwill) (adamw,
16:32:54)
- Ticket vote: BetaFreezeException (+3,0,-0)
(+bcotton, +kparal, +adamwill) (adamw,
16:32:56)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Final_Release_Criteria#Final_Blocker_Bugs
(geraldosimiao,
16:39:15)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Final_Release_Criteria#Final_Blocker_Bugs
(geraldosimiao,
16:40:08)
- AGREED: 2235236 -
RejectedBlocker (Beta) AcceptedBlocker (Final)
AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - this is rejected as a Beta blocker
as it doesn't violate any Beta criterion. It does violate the
security criterion for Final so it's accepted as a Final blocker,
and a Beta FE as it would be good to fix it for Beta too
(adamw,
16:45:55)
- that's all the Beta blocker proposals, moving
on to: (adamw,
16:46:28)
- proposed Beta freeze exceptions (adamw, 16:46:33)
- (2236321) coreutils-9.4 reverts an undesirable change to the -v option that landed in coreutils-9.3 (adamw, 16:46:44)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2236321
(adamw,
16:46:44)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1239
(adamw,
16:46:44)
- Proposed Freeze Exceptions, coreutils,
ON_QA (adamw,
16:46:44)
- AGREED: 2236321 -
AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - the benefit here isn't huge
(getting the new/old behaviour during live sessions and at first
boot, not just on first update) but the risk is also small and we're
feeling generous, so...fine (adamw,
16:55:12)
- (2237039) NeoChat cannot verify its sessions with other Matrix clients (adamw, 16:55:21)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237039
(adamw,
16:55:21)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1254
(adamw,
16:55:22)
- Proposed Freeze Exceptions, neochat,
ON_QA (adamw,
16:55:22)
- Ticket vote: BetaFreezeException (+2,0,-2)
(+nixuser, +lruzicka, -kparal, -adamwill) (adamw,
16:55:22)
- AGREED: 2237039 -
RejectedFreezeException (Beta) - as neochat is not preinstalled in
any image we know of, there doesn't seem to be any reason to give
this an FE, it is fine being a regular update (adamw,
17:00:47)
- that's all the proposed Beta FEs, let's move
onto: (adamw,
17:01:24)
- Proposed Final blockers (adamw, 17:01:28)
- two can be decided with ticket votes, so we
only have two to handle (adamw,
17:01:39)
- (2236438) Anaconda is very slow to show a window after clicking install in gnome-initial-setup (adamw, 17:02:08)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2236438
(adamw,
17:02:08)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1242
(adamw,
17:02:08)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED
(adamw,
17:02:08)
- Ticket vote: BetaFreezeException (+3,0,-0)
(+kparal, +lruzicka, +adamwill) (adamw,
17:02:08)
- AGREED: 2236438 -
RejectedBlocker (Final) - we agree that ideally anaconda should
start faster and/or the user should get some feedback indicating
it's loading, but this really doesn't take long enough to plausibly
constitute a release blocker. note it's already accepted as Beta
FE (adamw,
17:21:19)
- (2189899) Blivet-GUI: A btrfs partition can't be reformatted (adamw, 17:21:39)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189899
(adamw,
17:21:39)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1157
(adamw,
17:21:39)
- Proposed Blocker, blivet-gui, NEW (adamw,
17:21:39)
- Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+1,0,-0)
(+nielsenb) (adamw,
17:21:39)
- AGREED: 2189899 -
RejectedBlocker (Final) - based on feedback from vtrefny via kparal
at
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1157#comment-872594
, we agree it doesn't make sense to take too strict of an
interpretation and make this a blocker. we will document how to
handle it as a common bug (adamw,
17:30:54)
- (2187858) sddm-wayland-plasma does not respect keyboard layout variant (adamw, 17:31:09)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187858
(adamw,
17:31:09)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1158
(adamw,
17:31:09)
- Proposed Blocker, sddm, NEW (adamw,
17:31:09)
- Ticket vote: BetaBlocker (+1,0,-1)
(+geraldosimiao, -catanzaro) (adamw,
17:31:09)
- Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+3,0,-0)
(+geraldosimiao, +nielsenb, +catanzaro) (adamw,
17:31:11)
- AGREED: 2187858 -
punt (delay decision) - we did not yet get around to the re-testing
that we agreed last week is needed for this bug (adamw,
17:34:33)
- that's all the proposals, let's do a quick run
through: (adamw,
17:34:48)
- Accepted Beta blockers (adamw, 17:34:54)
- 2236398 - needs to be evaluated by anaconda
team now we've accepted it (adamw,
17:35:50)
- 2230720 , 2234928 , 2231680 are addressed, just
waiting push to stable (adamw,
17:36:30)
- 2232711 - we've attempted a fix, but lruzicka
said he still saw some kind of automatic suspend happen in testing,
I am asking for more details from him about that (adamw,
17:37:10)
- 2235100 is waiting for upstream acceptance
according to pbrobinson, 2113005 we will likely need to waive
again (adamw,
17:37:36)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232711
(geraldosimiao,
17:45:04)
- Open floor (adamw, 17:50:33)
Meeting ended at 17:52:58 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- (none)
People present (lines said)
- adamw (208)
- geraldosimiao (78)
- frantisekz (51)
- lruzicka (40)
- kparal (34)
- zodbot (10)
- amoloney (3)
Generated by MeetBot 0.4.