16:00:22 #startmeeting F39-blocker-review 16:00:22 Meeting started Mon Oct 23 16:00:22 2023 UTC. 16:00:22 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 16:00:22 The chair is adamw. Information about MeetBot at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zodbot#Meeting_Functions. 16:00:22 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 16:00:22 The meeting name has been set to 'f39-blocker-review' 16:00:22 #meetingname F39-blocker-review 16:00:23 The meeting name has been set to 'f39-blocker-review' 16:00:23 #topic Roll Call 16:00:23 Meeting started Mon Oct 23 16:00:22 2023 UTC. 16:00:23 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 16:00:23 The chair is adamw. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:23 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 16:00:24 The meeting name has been set to 'f39-blocker-review' 16:00:24 The meeting name has been set to 'f39-blocker-review' 16:00:25 morning folks 16:00:29 time for a very short meeting! 16:00:48 * coremodule is here, hi adamw 16:01:06 * coremodule has a confession to make. 16:01:50 I totally forgot to do the secretarialization work last week. That was my bad and I'm sorry for missing it. Thank you to whoever took care of it. 16:01:50 i am not a licensed priest, but go ahead 16:01:59 I think I did? 16:02:08 so, you're welcome. :P 16:02:10 grovel grovel 16:03:04 #chair coremodule 16:03:04 Current chairs: adamw coremodule 16:03:04 Current chairs: adamw coremodule 16:03:12 let's just blow through this, since we have nothing to actually vote on 16:03:19 sure 16:03:20 boilerplate time! 16:03:21 #topic Introduction 16:03:22 Why are we here? 16:03:22 #info Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. 16:03:22 #info We'll be following the process outlined at: 16:03:22 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting 16:03:26 #info The bugs up for review today are available at: 16:03:28 #link http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current 16:03:30 #info The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: 16:03:32 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Basic_Release_Criteria 16:03:34 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Beta_Release_Criteria 16:03:36 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Final_Release_Criteria 16:03:38 #info for F39 Final, we have: 16:03:40 #info 4 Accepted Blockers 16:03:42 #info 1 Accepted Previous Release Blockers 16:03:45 #info 4 Accepted Freeze Exceptions 16:04:00 #info as there are no proposed blockers or FEs, we will not need a secretary 16:04:05 #info let's cut straight to: 16:04:10 #topic Accepted Final blockers 16:04:21 #topic (2241632) Netinstall ISO renders a black screen when using kickstart install (bare metal and VM) 16:04:21 #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241632 16:04:22 #link https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1354 16:04:22 #info Accepted Blocker, mutter, POST 16:05:29 #info there is now a proposal upstream which seems to me to fix everything - https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/3329#note_1874837 . it has not been moved past the state of 'comment on the PR' yet, though. I will try and get that moved forward today 16:05:42 cool 16:05:43 #action adamw to get the fix for 2241632 moved along in the process 16:06:25 #topic (2113005) Live image made with BOOTX64.EFI from latest shim-x64-15.6-2 fails to boot on some boards 16:06:25 #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2113005 16:06:25 #link https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1154 16:06:25 #info Accepted Blocker, shim, NEW 16:06:27 #info to be waived 16:06:33 #topic (2241252) U-Boot fails to load kernel provided DTs from /boot (RPi4 boots to blank screen) 16:06:33 #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241252 16:06:33 #link https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1352 16:06:35 #info Accepted Blocker, uboot-tools, ASSIGNED 16:06:44 I have tested this using an RPi4 on Fedora-Minimal-39-20231016.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz and Fedora-Workstation-39-20231016.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz with the new uboot, it works just like it should. I'm currently writing today's Workstation image to test there, but I can confirm that this new uboot fixes the issue. 16:06:56 that's the hardcoded one though, right? 16:07:03 yes 16:07:04 also, spot the guy who had his paste buffer lined up. :D 16:07:12 but at least we know what to do 16:07:23 can you add that as a comment to the bug just so we look busy? :D 16:07:26 lol, I've been testing all morning, gotta get my info out! 16:07:47 yes, as soon as I get today's image tested, I will write a comment with the three images I tested 16:07:58 autocorrect 16:08:06 #info pbrobinson gave an update in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241252#c16 , he knows what the issue is here in detail and is working on the fix. coremodule has confirmed by testing that pbrobinson is on the right track 16:08:29 anything else on that? 16:08:34 nope, all I had! 16:09:03 #topic (2244305) Fedora Server 39 does not boot on Raspberry Pi 4 (RPi4) from microSD card slot 16:09:03 #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244305 16:09:03 #link https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1411 16:09:03 #info Accepted Blocker, uboot-tools, POST 16:09:09 okay, I have something here too 16:09:13 fire away 16:09:40 just from my own personal testing, I haven't run into this a single time, and I've booted an RPi4 with SD cards seriously like 30 times since this time last week 16:10:16 not that that necessarily means anything, but, should it come down to it, I would be willing to argue that we shouldn't block on it based off my personal testing. just my testing. 16:10:30 I haven't been able to hit it either 16:10:46 Does anyone have a link to the upstream discussion of the fix referenced? 16:11:12 nielsenb, I don't... 16:11:52 that also sounds like useful information on deciding whether whatever trade-off the fix comes with is worth it 16:12:02 again, could you guys add that to the bug as comments if you didn't already? 16:12:24 wilco 16:14:00 #info pbrobinson posted in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244305#c14 (without any references) that there is a potential fix for this being discussed upstream, but it comes with unspecified tradeoffs. coremodule and nielsenb note that they have not been able to trigger the bug 16:14:10 Well, my 20 seconds on DuckDuckGo didn't turn anything up, I'll just assume it's spicy 16:14:25 #info we will need more details on the potential fix and then we'll have to decide whether it's worth pulling it in based on how common the bug seems to be 16:15:40 i think it may be https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2023-October/533018.html ? not sure 16:16:26 oh, no. maybe https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2023-October/533298.html 16:18:05 https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2023-October/534553.html is juicy! 16:18:23 anyhow. 16:18:33 that's all we got 16:18:35 #topic Open floor 16:19:04 sweet! 16:19:07 good meeting 16:19:19 A real tour de force 16:21:10 my favorite kinda meeting 16:21:54 That thread indeed gets spicy 16:22:56 updated both rpi4 bugs with my experiences 16:22:56 taking a quick look at testcase_stats it looks like our testing coverage is pretty solid 16:23:00 thanks coremodule 16:24:49 .hello geraldosimiao 16:24:49 geraldosimiao: [hellomynameis geraldosimiao] 16:24:50 geraldosimiao: geraldosimiao 'Geraldo S. SimiĆ£o Kutz' 16:25:10 hey geraldo 16:25:13 we're just about done :) 16:25:16 ok 16:25:18 did you have anything for open floor? 16:25:19 sorry[ 16:25:26 was out from home 16:25:36 no 16:25:42 nothing 16:26:09 alrighty 16:26:12 i guess we're done here 16:26:15 thanks for coming, folks 16:26:21 Thanks for having me 16:26:24 Bye 16:26:45 #endmeeting