16:00:02 #startmeeting Fedora 14 Alpha Blocker Meeting #2 16:00:02 Meeting started Fri Jul 23 16:00:02 2010 UTC. The chair is poelcat. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:02 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 16:00:07 #topic roll call 16:00:19 who is around? 16:00:44 jlaska: adamw anyone else? 16:01:10 yo 16:01:43 * jlaska lurks 16:02:42 adamw: is just the dangerous duo of us again? 16:02:55 oh, hi jlaska 16:03:30 * brunowolff is here 16:03:35 howdy 16:03:46 * poelcat notes we have 5 bugs to run through, would love to finish in 30 minutes so I'm going to drive fast 16:04:05 if you have to step away lets us know so we aren't left hanging 16:04:23 #topic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597858 16:04:24 Bug 597858: high, high, ---, gecko-bugs-nobody, NEW, "SELinux is preventing firefox from making its memory writable and executable." crashes rawhide firefox start 16:04:54 "It must be possible to run the default web browser and a terminal application from the default desktop environment" 16:05:00 reading the comments it seems like a no-brainer 16:05:05 yeah 16:05:50 anyone know the specific maintainer? 16:06:18 or shall we mark this as an approved blocker and move on 16:06:19 so this happens to all i686 firefoxes? yeah, seems straightforward 16:06:40 my observation so far is that we loose a lot of time trying to track down people during the meeting 16:06:44 it shouldn't block F14Blocker *and* F14Alpha 16:07:21 I don't know if this is running firefox.i386 on an x86_64 install 16:07:29 or firefox.i386 on an i686 install 16:07:37 one of those scenarios seems more common 16:07:50 proposed action--approved blocker, remove F14Blocker, request feedback from maintainer? 16:07:56 poelcat: it is actually a big problem and it is being worked on upstream 16:08:09 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=506693 16:08:10 Bug 506693: normal, --, ---, nnethercote, ASSIGNED, SELinux is preventing JIT from changing memory segment access 16:08:11 mcepl: any details you can provide, please add to the comments 16:08:20 not now 16:08:24 comment#5 seems to indicate it's failing on the native arch 16:08:50 * poelcat trying to spend no more than 5 minutes on each bug today 16:08:54 this one is about to expire :) 16:09:11 responses to my proposed actions? 16:09:11 no objections, I think it's a valid F14Alpha blocker 16:09:24 +1 16:09:31 sure 16:09:48 #action https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597858 approved blocker, remove F14Blocker, request feedback from maintainer 16:09:49 Bug 597858: high, high, ---, gecko-bugs-nobody, NEW, "SELinux is preventing firefox from making its memory writable and executable." crashes rawhide firefox start 16:10:04 who wants to take care of the paperwork for each of the bugs today? 16:11:38 hum, just reading the upstream bug 16:11:41 "> Hey nick, whats the status of this? 16:11:41 The code works, someone needs to decide if it's a good idea and should be 16:11:41 landed. Eg. see comment 99." 16:11:53 it seems there's already a patch for it. if this were any *other* package, we could fix it now. le sigh. 16:12:25 adamw: does that change our proposed action? 16:13:14 #topic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613695 16:13:15 Bug 613695: medium, medium, ---, mgracik, MODIFIED, ImportError: cannot import name GObject 16:13:15 it looks to me like we need someone to go to bat for this upstream if it's going to happen. 16:13:22 gee, thanks for waiting! 16:13:47 sorry about that 16:14:01 right now we have a big ugly mess and fairly minor firepower on the rh/fedora side trying to sort the thing out 16:14:10 which is why it's been sitting there since, apparently, f12 and hasn't been fixed yet... 16:14:53 looks like martin stransky might be in a position to provide guidance ... he's on the upstream bug and redhat 16:15:02 let's stick with our "request feedback from maintainer" 16:15:03 i think it would probably be profitable to mail the folks from fedora/rh side who are involved on the upstream bug plus the active firefox maintainers and ask them to do what they need to to get it done upstream, otherwise i rather doubt it's going to happen 16:15:30 how do i go backwards to the previous topic? 16:15:49 poelcat: I think you just do #topic again 16:16:08 #topic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597858 16:16:09 Bug 597858: high, high, ---, gecko-bugs-nobody, NEW, "SELinux is preventing firefox from making its memory writable and executable." crashes rawhide firefox start 16:16:55 the guy to contact is Martin Stránský 16:17:16 #action https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597858 approved blocker, remove F14Blocker, request feedback from maintainer, contact Martin Stránský to get a better idea of the future of this bug 16:17:17 Bug 597858: high, high, ---, gecko-bugs-nobody, NEW, "SELinux is preventing firefox from making its memory writable and executable." crashes rawhide firefox start 16:17:22 okay to move on now>? 16:17:41 yes, not sure we can add anything more to that bug here 16:18:01 #topic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613695 16:18:03 Bug 613695: medium, medium, ---, mgracik, MODIFIED, ImportError: cannot import name GObject 16:18:13 jlaska: any luck testing this one? 16:18:24 should be fixed, waiting on these next acceptance images to confirm 16:18:40 should be back in ASSIGNED, or VERIFIED->CLOSED next week 16:18:45 hopefully the later 16:19:14 #action https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613695 should be back in ASSIGNED, or VERIFIED->CLOSED next week 16:19:15 Bug 613695: medium, medium, ---, mgracik, MODIFIED, ImportError: cannot import name GObject 16:19:36 #topic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615443 16:19:37 Bug 615443: high, low, ---, dhuff, NEW, boot from liveusb fails (can't mount root filesystem) 16:19:51 i contacted dhuff and he was going to look at before our meeting 16:19:57 looks like he didn't get a chance 16:20:07 oops wrong bug # 16:20:18 i updated the firefox bug. 16:20:31 I tried looking at why things might mount and got as far as finding the ext3 image wasn't mountable. 16:20:31 check that, it is the right next bug number 16:20:33 adamw: thank you! 16:20:49 However when I rebuilt locally I didn't see that. 16:21:11 However testing further was blocked by the blackscreen related bug. 16:21:37 brunowolff: so hard to really confirm/deny this bug due to the other blackscreen issue? 16:21:39 it seems like a no-brainer blocker. 16:21:40 I will try to do some more testing this weekend, but it's very slow to do on my hardware. 16:21:45 adamw: +1 16:22:00 unless the issue is in the actual nightly compose process somehow (since that's not 'official fedora') 16:22:15 you can get past the image/blackscreen bug 16:22:17 I am not sure why the ext3 image on my local rawhide build was mountable and the ones from the nicghtly compose site weren't. 16:22:21 by holding down shift on boot 16:22:35 Testing that the problem is fixed was complicated by the other issue. 16:22:37 * nirik has no idea why it's broken either. 16:23:04 nirik: ah, good tip about holding 16:23:18 that gets you to a boot: prompt at least 16:23:19 can you add that to the bug? 16:23:20 I also didn't test newer composes. I will try the latest nightly compose of some image this weekend to see if that part of the problem is fixed. 16:23:32 brunowolff: were you testing soas, or another nightly live image? 16:23:40 I tried doing tab and delete. 16:23:48 * nirik sees the same thing on xfce nightly. 16:24:12 I was testing kde for the ext3 stuff, though built livecd-desktop for my local test. 16:24:13 okay ... so it's not isolated to one spin 16:24:28 I wanted to test something smaller so I could download it quicker. 16:24:48 #chair adamw jlaska brunowolff nirik 16:24:48 Current chairs: adamw brunowolff jlaska nirik poelcat 16:25:03 w/in18 16:25:08 The livecd-desktop ks also is doing something bad, but I don't think it is related to the problems we are seeing. 16:25:15 doh! 16:25:28 so the summary here is 'live CDs are utterly screwed' 16:25:33 sounds like it 16:25:36 proposed next action(s)? 16:25:43 well, accept this bug for a start 16:25:48 maybe add jkeating to CC? 16:26:03 I want to see if I can get the blackscreen stuff fixed as there have been some useful comments there. 16:26:05 and perhaps monitor the nightlies for the next week and try to keep track of exactly what's broken in each 16:26:25 Also I want to test the latest nightly composes to see if the ext3 image issue went away there. 16:26:47 we've certainly confirmed the problem exists and is widespread ... need some love to further isolate+diagnose 16:27:04 #action https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615443 approved blocker, add jkeating to CC, monitor the nightlies for the next week and try to keep track of exactly what's broken in each 16:27:06 Bug 615443: high, low, ---, dhuff, NEW, boot from liveusb fails (can't mount root filesystem) 16:27:15 #info we've certainly confirmed the problem exists and is widespread ... need some love to further isolate+diagnose 16:27:25 okay to move on? 16:27:51 sure 16:27:51 btw could someone update the bugs to reflect our agreed on actions for each? 16:28:16 i've done the firefox one and now this one 16:28:32 I can take a few, but could use some help ... err thanks adamw! 16:28:32 i missed 613695 16:28:35 is anyone else willing to help? 16:28:40 I'll get that one 16:28:43 thanks adamw 16:29:12 #topic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616090 16:29:13 Bug 616090: medium, low, ---, bcl, MODIFIED, Rescue mode fails 16:29:25 it's that jlaska guy again ;-) 16:29:41 same deal, I'll update the bz 16:29:56 I'll retest this with the new rawhide acceptance images when they land 16:30:35 "# The rescue mode of the installer must start successfully and be able to detect and mount an existing default installation " 16:30:48 any objections? 16:30:52 #action https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616090 jlaska will retest this with the new rawhide acceptance images when they land 16:30:53 Bug 616090: medium, low, ---, bcl, MODIFIED, Rescue mode fails 16:31:01 jlaska: add the AcceptedBlocker whiteboard field... 16:31:06 adamw: you got it, thx 16:31:28 #topic #topic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617115 16:31:29 Bug 617115: medium, low, ---, dhuff, NEW, rawhide live spins showing black screen instead of syslinux boot menu 16:31:38 this is the other bug brunowolff was referencing 16:31:48 Yes 16:31:48 seems to be the issue discussed in that other bug 16:31:48 yeah 16:32:06 nirik: did you have some ideas as to what might be causing this? 16:32:12 I'm not sure if livecd-tools is the right component 16:32:33 I think it's a change in anaconda. 16:32:34 or if this is also related to fedora-logos changes 16:32:38 nirik: oh 16:32:40 it's putting the image in the wrong place or not at all. 16:32:51 or not updating the syslinux files with the new path or something. 16:33:16 my strategy in such cases is usually to add the world to CC 16:33:25 logos maintainer, livecd-tools maintainer, anaconda maintainer 16:33:32 bash enough heads together and eventually you get somewhere =) 16:33:34 sounds awefully similar to a previous F14Alpha blocker about the boot graphic not showing up when booting installer 16:33:51 that got closed by spot as fixed in the current fedora-logos package ... but this bug report uses that package 16:33:57 so still broken, or wrong component 16:34:14 The other bug had some discussion of this, but spun off a separate bug after we decided there were two issues. 16:34:36 * jlaska thinking about bug#614488 16:34:37 Bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=614488 medium, low, ---, tcallawa, CLOSED RAWHIDE, syslinux-vesa-splash.jpg installed to wrong location 16:35:02 they seem related 16:35:27 but like adamw already said ... we need some help from maintainers fedora-logos and/or anaconda? 16:35:50 as for F14Alpha blocker ... 16:35:56 I think this impacts "# The installer must boot (if appropriate) and run on all primary architectures from default live image, DVD, and boot.iso install media " 16:36:02 yeah, it's straightforward enough 16:36:41 shall i update the bug and add some CCs? 16:36:42 alright, so ApprovedBlocker and enact adamw bug resolution strategy#48 ? 16:36:46 =) 16:36:57 go for it! 16:37:06 not #48! NEVER #48! there's a reason it's under double key security, y'know 16:37:18 :P 16:38:13 * jlaska just noticed /topic isn't set ... is zodbot upset? 16:38:28 oh, double #topic perhaps? 16:38:32 #topic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617115 16:38:33 Bug 617115: medium, low, ---, dhuff, NEW, rawhide live spins showing black screen instead of syslinux boot menu 16:38:48 proposed-action https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617115 ApprovedBlocker, add "the world" to the CC list so we can get some more help attention and help on this critical issue 16:38:49 Bug 617115: medium, low, ---, dhuff, NEW, rawhide live spins showing black screen instead of syslinux boot menu 16:39:07 poelcat: you got the #action 16:39:12 the +t flag is set so it can't set the topic. 16:39:24 #action https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617115 ApprovedBlocker, add "the world" to the CC list so we can get some more help attention and help on this critical issue 16:39:25 Bug 617115: medium, low, ---, dhuff, NEW, rawhide live spins showing black screen instead of syslinux boot menu 16:39:33 nirik: aha, you always have the channel foo :) 16:39:40 #topic open discussion 16:39:46 that's all the bugs for today 16:39:47 nirik, what system is the nightly compose builder running? Could the recent glibc change to support 2.6.32+ have an effect? 16:39:51 * jlaska tips hat to nirik 16:39:59 anything else we should cover? 16:40:08 brunowolff: it's a rawhide xen guest. 16:40:15 F14Beta is empty 16:40:24 it's running the f13 kernel tho, as the rawhide one was blowing up last I tried it. 16:40:28 could it be kernel related? 16:41:05 F13 kernels should be fine. 16:42:11 I'll be able to do some testing over the weekend. But I have a lot of Fedora stuff to do, and some of it probably isn't going to get done as soon as I had hopped. 16:42:57 brunowolff: is this something we could ask for general testing feedback on from test@ list? 16:43:27 or do we know the problem well enough that we don't need more test failures 16:44:07 Right now probably not. By Monday I might have a different opinion. 16:44:19 brunowolff: okay 16:44:25 poelcat: no other topics from me 16:44:35 nirik: adamw: brunowolff: howabout you guys? 16:44:40 Done 16:44:43 nope 16:44:56 alrighty ... let's end with a quick friday joke 16:45:06 * jlaska might regret that request 16:45:17 someone has to have a funny link or story? :) 16:45:31 * nirik has nothing. 16:45:40 * adamw can't think of anything that wouldn't potentially get him fired 16:45:49 haha 16:45:50 thanks for your help jlaska brunowolff adamw nirik 16:45:53 #endmeeting