16:02:53 #startmeeting Fedora 14 Alpha blocker bug review meeting 16:02:53 Meeting started Fri Aug 13 16:02:53 2010 UTC. The chair is adamw. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:02:53 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 16:02:59 #topic gathering 16:03:04 who's here? am i on my own? =) 16:04:15 hi, jsmith 16:04:19 Howdy adamw 16:04:31 * jsmith has to leave early, unfortunately 16:06:56 * nirik is lurking around. 16:07:10 so we have me, nirik and a leaving-early jsmith 16:07:15 * adamw wonders if that makes a quorum =) 16:10:28 well, let's go for it 16:10:54 we have exactly one bug on the Alpha tracker 16:10:56 #topic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596985 16:10:57 Bug 596985: urgent, low, ---, jglisse, NEW, hang at start of X11 on fresh install from DVD 16:12:02 * nirik is still trying to get past -devel list, so haven't seen new info on this. 16:12:05 do we have more info? 16:12:50 yes 16:12:58 it's not particularly conclusive though :/ 16:13:09 for some people, it's okay. so we haven't broken every radeon in history. 16:13:16 however, a rather large number of people do have problems. 16:13:27 hold a sec, let me get some links 16:13:48 at least with xdriver=vesa they can work around it? 16:14:05 http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=249981 16:14:07 has two fails 16:14:25 http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-August/092681.html 16:15:12 has one pass and three fails 16:15:41 so it looks like we do have quite a lot of trouble here. 16:15:53 nirik: not much data on that yet (as much of the testing was with rc3). 16:16:54 yeah, I guess maintainer is looking into it... 16:17:05 do we have time for another rc before go/nogo next week? 16:17:56 yes, we do 16:18:08 the only tricky thing is getting it built 16:18:17 oxf13 is out of action and dgilmore is pto till tuesday 16:18:22 ideally we'd want it composed monday, really 16:18:41 i'll try and get those experiencing fails to attach logs in the bug if they can 16:21:19 the sheer number of fails here does worry me a bit. it feels like if we don't fix this we're pushing an alpha where nearly all radeon users have to use a workaround, which seems to rather suck. 16:21:29 do you guys have feelings on blockeriness? 16:21:48 this counts as a judgment call under the criteria, btw - we leave room for judgment on hardware-dependent fails 16:22:04 not sure. I guess if we can get maintainer(s) info and they can dig in we can ask them more monday... 16:22:44 Right... 16:22:48 I think we need more info 16:23:00 okay...i'll ask dave and jerome to prioritize this and if possible get us more info over the weekend 16:23:08 Sounds good 16:23:09 and see if we can get more details from some of the reporters 16:24:21 ok 16:24:46 so, poelcat put the beta bugs on the agenda 16:25:03 but i'm not sure it's worth going through them with just us...wdyt? 16:25:20 #agreed 596985 still awaiting data, but worrying 16:25:36 #action adamw to continue trying to squeeze out data on 596985 from reporters and maintainers 16:27:35 yeah, not sure it is... 16:27:44 anything super worrying in there yet? 16:28:46 it's not that long, which is good 16:28:53 the bugs on it are clearly blockers but ought to be fixable stuff. 16:41:22 okay, then, let's just wrap it up (sorry, got lost in emails) 16:41:32 we'll look at this bug again monday 16:41:37 thanks folks! 16:41:39 #endmeeting