#fedora-bugzappers: Fedora 14 Beta Blocker Meeting

Meeting started by poelcat at 16:02:33 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

  1. roll call (poelcat, 16:02:51)
    1. attendees nirik adamw jlaska poelcat jsmith (poelcat, 16:05:37)

  2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608992 (poelcat, 16:05:45)
    1. ACTION: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608992 waiting for a new build, needs to happen soon (poelcat, 16:07:25)

  3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621027 (poelcat, 16:07:34)
    1. ACTION: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621027 asking mizmo to update the bug and remind design team of change deadline on 2010-09-14 (poelcat, 16:12:53)

  4. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628239 (poelcat, 16:13:08)
    1. ACTION: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628239 need to continue debugging before we can figure out where it needs to be fixed (poelcat, 16:20:05)

  5. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629719 (poelcat, 16:20:22)
    1. ACTION: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629719 attempting to reproduce. If we cannot do so with TC1 testing will close INSUFFICIENT_DATA (poelcat, 16:28:36)

  6. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630490 (poelcat, 16:28:41)
    1. ACTION: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630490 fix is in hand, maintainer expects to build new package tonight (poelcat, 16:45:36)

  7. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630781 (poelcat, 16:45:48)
    1. ACTION: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630781 really need more information from reporter; if no further information or similiar reports by next week, will consider dropping (poelcat, 16:53:24)

  8. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631620 (poelcat, 16:53:32)
    1. ACTION: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631620 fix and new packages anticipated this weekend, needs testing by kde, xfce and other desktops depending on HAL (poelcat, 17:05:05)

  9. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632489 (poelcat, 17:05:25)
    1. ACTION: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632489 accepted as a blocker, fixed needed no later than 2010-09-14 (poelcat, 17:14:11)

  10. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632510 (poelcat, 17:14:18)
    1. ACTION: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632510 accepted blocker; need to ammend blocker criteria to be more specific, devel believes it's an easy fix they expect to make soon (poelcat, 17:25:40)

  11. open discussion (poelcat, 17:25:44)
    1. ACTION: jlaska to propose adjusting beta release criteria to accomodate rescue-mode + networking (see 632510) (jlaska, 17:26:18)


Meeting ended at 17:31:28 UTC (full logs).

Action items

  1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608992 waiting for a new build, needs to happen soon
  2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621027 asking mizmo to update the bug and remind design team of change deadline on 2010-09-14
  3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628239 need to continue debugging before we can figure out where it needs to be fixed
  4. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629719 attempting to reproduce. If we cannot do so with TC1 testing will close INSUFFICIENT_DATA
  5. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630490 fix is in hand, maintainer expects to build new package tonight
  6. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630781 really need more information from reporter; if no further information or similiar reports by next week, will consider dropping
  7. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631620 fix and new packages anticipated this weekend, needs testing by kde, xfce and other desktops depending on HAL
  8. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632489 accepted as a blocker, fixed needed no later than 2010-09-14
  9. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632510 accepted blocker; need to ammend blocker criteria to be more specific, devel believes it's an easy fix they expect to make soon
  10. jlaska to propose adjusting beta release criteria to accomodate rescue-mode + networking (see 632510)


Action items, by person

  1. jlaska
    1. jlaska to propose adjusting beta release criteria to accomodate rescue-mode + networking (see 632510)
  2. UNASSIGNED
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608992 waiting for a new build, needs to happen soon
    2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621027 asking mizmo to update the bug and remind design team of change deadline on 2010-09-14
    3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628239 need to continue debugging before we can figure out where it needs to be fixed
    4. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629719 attempting to reproduce. If we cannot do so with TC1 testing will close INSUFFICIENT_DATA
    5. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630490 fix is in hand, maintainer expects to build new package tonight
    6. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630781 really need more information from reporter; if no further information or similiar reports by next week, will consider dropping
    7. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631620 fix and new packages anticipated this weekend, needs testing by kde, xfce and other desktops depending on HAL
    8. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632489 accepted as a blocker, fixed needed no later than 2010-09-14
    9. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632510 accepted blocker; need to ammend blocker criteria to be more specific, devel believes it's an easy fix they expect to make soon


People present (lines said)

  1. adamw (98)
  2. jlaska (82)
  3. poelcat (67)
  4. mezcalero (43)
  5. jsmith (21)
  6. buggbot (13)
  7. bcl (7)
  8. dlehman (7)
  9. Camberwell (6)
  10. nirik (4)
  11. zodbot (3)


Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.