#fedora-bugzappers: interim beta blocker bug review meeting 2010-09-14

Meeting summary

1. intro (adamw, 18:06:07)
   
2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608992 (adamw, 18:07:23)
   1. AGREED: 633827 adamw will test bcl's proposed fix and feed back to him (adamw, 18:13:53)
   2. ACTION: adamw to test bcl fix for 633827 (adamw, 18:14:04)
   
   
3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621027 (adamw, 18:14:49)
   1. AGREED: 621027 fix is in but problem with live image bootloader background, jlaska to test potential fix from mizmo (adamw, 18:19:08)
   2. ACTION: jlaska to test 621027 fixes from mizmo (adamw, 18:19:16)
   
   
4. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622927 (adamw, 18:21:12)
   1. AGREED: 622927 ask tester to verify fix in TC1 and close the bug (adamw, 18:24:01)
   
   
5. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627014 (adamw, 18:24:33)
   1. AGREED: 627014 looks like major issues are fixed, we can drop it from blocker list or close it when 10-1+ is accepted (adamw, 18:30:15)
   
   
6. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627401 (adamw, 18:30:32)
   1. AGREED: 627401 is fixed in anaconda 14.17.1-1, anaconda team need to submit that or a later build to bodhi (adamw, 18:34:02)
   
   
7. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628239 (adamw, 18:34:26)
   1. AGREED: 628239 does not appear to be valid as described, waiting on more info from reporter, but unless we learn something new, looks like this isn't a blocker (adamw, 18:38:34)
   
   
8. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628241 (adamw, 18:39:38)
   1. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/firstboot-1.113-1.fc14 - i posted a comment asking mgracik to push it (adamw, 18:41:31)
   2. AGREED: 628241 is fixed in firstboot-1.113-1, needs to be pushed stable (adamw, 18:44:17)
   3. ACTION: mgracik or notting to push firstboot-1.113-1 stable (adamw, 18:44:30)
   
   
9. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629719 (adamw, 18:44:40)
   1. AGREED: 629719: we suspect reporter malfeasance, plan is to try and replicate in office, send out ml call to see if anyone else can, and ask reporter to try once more; if we get no more info on this bug will demote it (adamw, 19:06:20)
   2. ACTION: adamw or jlaska to send out ml testing call for 629719 (adamw, 19:06:33)
   
   
10. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630490 (adamw, 19:07:00)
    1. AGREED: 630490 testing indicates this is fixed in systemd-10, can be closed when that goes stable (adamw, 19:09:50)
    
    
11. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630952 (adamw, 19:10:32)
    1. AGREED: testing indicates 630952 fix is good, bug can be closed when systemd/initscripts update goes stable (adamw, 19:12:35)
    
    
12. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631620 (adamw, 19:12:58)
    1. AGREED: 631620 fix looks good in all important respects, can be closed when hal update is pushed (adamw, 19:18:26)
    
    
13. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632321 (adamw, 19:18:45)
    1. AGREED: 632321 is fixed in systemd 10, can be closed when it goes stable (adamw, 19:29:40)
    
    
14. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632489 (adamw, 19:29:51)
    1. AGREED: 632489 fix has been tested in updates.img, next anaconda build will include it (adamw, 19:32:20)
    
    
15. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632510 (adamw, 19:32:40)
    1. AGREED: 632510 fix is in, needs a new build to test it; can either be a quick test boot.iso or we can test it in rc1 (adamw, 19:37:56)
    
    
16. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633234 (adamw, 19:38:05)
    1. AGREED: 633234 is a blocker, top priority for anaconda team, it seems reproducible by at least two testers (adamw, 19:47:29)
    2. ACTION: anaconda team to try and investigate and fix 633234 (adamw, 19:47:37)
    
    
17. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633315 (adamw, 19:48:19)
    1. AGREED: 633315 doesn't seem like a blocker, we will reject it for now and ask radek to re-propose if he has a reason for it to be one (adamw, 20:02:24)
    
    
18. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633523 (adamw, 20:06:45)
    1. AGREED: 633523 is an accepted blocker, we cc mclasen on the bug and ask for a rebuild asap (adamw, 20:12:51)
    
    
19. open floor (adamw, 20:12:57)
    
20. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528232 (adamw, 20:14:01)
    1. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_14_Final_Release_Criteria says nothing about EFI (poelcat, 20:15:48)
    2. AGREED: 528232 isn't a blocker, Macs are explicitly excepted from efi criterion in beta criteria (adamw, 20:18:09)
    3. ACTION: adamw to check in with lennart on 630225 (adamw, 20:22:39)
    
    
21. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633523 (adamw, 20:25:36)
    1. ACTION: bpepple will try to get an empathy version bump done, if this isn't possible he will do a rebuild for tomorrow (adamw, 20:29:30)

Action items

1. adamw to test bcl fix for 633827
2. jlaska to test 621027 fixes from mizmo
3. mgracik or notting to push firstboot-1.113-1 stable
4. adamw or jlaska to send out ml testing call for 629719
5. anaconda team to try and investigate and fix 633234
6. adamw to check in with lennart on 630225
7. bpepple will try to get an empathy version bump done, if this isn't possible he will do a rebuild for tomorrow

Action items, by person

1. adamw
   1. adamw to test bcl fix for 633827
   2. adamw or jlaska to send out ml testing call for 629719
   3. adamw to check in with lennart on 630225
2. bcl
   1. adamw to test bcl fix for 633827
3. bpepple
   1. bpepple will try to get an empathy version bump done, if this isn't possible he will do a rebuild for tomorrow
4. jlaska
   1. jlaska to test 621027 fixes from mizmo
   2. adamw or jlaska to send out ml testing call for 629719
5. notting
   1. mgracik or notting to push firstboot-1.113-1 stable

People present (lines said)

1. adamw (237)
2. jlaska (51)
3. notting (26)
4. buggbot (22)
5. dlehman (21)
6. poelcat (19)
7. bcl (6)
8. michich (6)
9. bpepple (5)
10. zodbot (3)
11. jsmith (1)