15:35:00 #startmeeting Fedora CI SIG 15:35:00 Meeting started Wed Mar 11 15:35:00 2020 UTC. 15:35:00 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 15:35:00 The chair is bookwar. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:35:00 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:35:00 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_ci_sig' 15:35:07 #topic Init 15:35:12 .hello2 15:35:13 bookwar: bookwar 'Aleksandra Fedorova' 15:35:18 .hello2 15:35:19 jimbair: jimbair 'Jim Bair' 15:35:24 .hello2 15:35:25 bgoncalv: bgoncalv 'Bruno Goncalves' 15:35:25 .hello2 15:35:27 .hello2 15:35:28 msrb: msrb 'Michal Srb' 15:35:31 tflink: tflink 'Tim Flink' 15:36:07 thanks everyone for coming 15:36:11 let's get started 15:36:43 #link https://etherpad.gnome.org/p/fedora-ci 15:36:55 .hello2 15:36:56 dcantrell: dcantrell 'David Cantrell' 15:36:58 add your talking points if you want to get the floor time 15:37:07 #topic Fedora CI work 15:37:24 So i've send a mail today summarizing some of the work items 15:37:37 and i ralized it is hard to track them 15:38:19 so i identified some people and docs and sources, but basically we have a proper landing page only for the Zuul effort and a bit of it for CI 15:38:40 what do you think we should do about this? 15:39:19 the one option is to have each effort tracked by taiga, the other is to have me writing the digest mails like today 15:39:36 has anyone used Taiga before? any reason not to use it? 15:40:05 the potential duplication of tickets is the only thing I can think of 15:40:26 between taiga and Pagure? 15:41:24 between taiga and wherever the work is being tracked 15:41:33 but that may already be figured out 15:41:51 ie, no duplication. I don't pretend to know a whole lot about what's going on 15:42:35 ok, so i think we don't have that much of alternative tracking yet anyway, so I would suggest to everyone to take a look at Taiga and create a high level Epic for the task you do, or update the one you already have 15:42:45 so that we use it as a communication channel 15:43:27 let's try it and discuss next meeting if it works 15:43:49 I've never used it, but I'm on board to try it 15:43:59 taiga is teams.fp.org? 15:44:02 yes 15:44:03 https://teams.fedoraproject.org/discover yeah 15:44:12 I googled "Fedora Taiga" and found it :) 15:44:23 there is CI project, if you don't have invite, i can send it to you 15:45:00 #link https://teams.fedoraproject.org/project/ci/ 15:45:17 bookwar, I think I need added 15:45:34 #action Everyone, ask bookwar for the invite and edit rights to the project 15:45:44 will do it after the meeting 15:45:52 so moving on 15:46:17 #topic Taskotron Going EOL on 2020-04-30 15:46:57 So we have a dead for the Taskotron tests which we would like to replace with new Jenkins master and piepline setup 15:47:10 a dead? 15:47:13 have a deadline* 15:47:24 sorry, don't know how i missed that part ) 15:47:37 typing is hard 15:47:50 eh, I've been having more typos than usual today, I can't complain :) 15:48:22 tflink: we talked about it briefly but i forgot the outcome, do we have a full list of tests we need to migrate? 15:48:36 we have rpmdeplint, rpminspect and installability on the radar 15:48:38 just rpmdeplint and python-versions 15:49:13 python-versions - is it a static analysis of sorts? 15:49:37 yeah, it looks at whether python packages are correctly referring to python2 and python3 15:49:58 msrb: i guess it is coming your way 15:50:04 ack 15:50:21 #action msrb Look into python-version test implementation and add it to the generic tests setup 15:50:24 mhroncok talked about it on devel@ yesterday, I think he may want to make changes if/when it's ported 15:50:59 ok 15:51:20 I'd like to be a bit more clear on who's doing that work so I'm not duplicating what seems to be already in progress 15:51:40 * tflink has another meeting at the top of the hour, not sure if we're going to get that far by then 15:52:01 tflink: msrb is working on the pipeline setup - trigger, run something, get result, publish 15:52:15 the "something" part is a black-box (kind of) 15:52:36 so is there a need to change this part? 15:52:45 ok, does that mean I shouldn't be working on any of that? 15:53:02 tflink, I think we should sync :) 15:53:14 maybe you can take the task of writing a TMT definition for the test? 15:53:25 yeah, that would be helpful. I'm wondering why I even bothered working on the rpminspect or generic stuff 15:53:57 because now we have the rpminspect up and running and getting feedback ) 15:54:02 which is thanks to you 15:54:16 yes, thanks tflink! 15:54:17 otherwise we would be delayed for half a year more 15:54:17 only to be duplicated while I'm pestering folks about getting a testing instance 15:54:56 * tflink will sync with msrb later and hopefully get some of this figured out 15:55:10 I haven't touched rpminspect yet, so no duplication so far :) 15:56:14 tflink: that's how the iteration process goes, I think, you had some problems solved which Jim has only started to look at, like Jenkins auth for example. We don't completely remove whatever you did, we make a lift to next level 15:56:18 and we just starting 15:56:44 some more communication on that would be helpful 15:56:50 #action msrb sync with tflink on sharing tasks 15:57:10 yes, point taken 15:57:15 so I don't get surprised by an announcement that other people are doing the work 15:57:30 Anyone has anything else for discussion? 15:58:38 tflink: i think we talked about the work we are going to do in January, I was just late to summarize it in a this way. Sorry it took so long. 15:58:47 #topic Open floor 15:59:56 ok, closing in a minute 16:00:44 oh one thing 16:00:55 sure 16:01:03 just to post it here, communishift will be down from 2020-04-10 to 2020-05-01 for the datacenter move 16:01:27 not sure how widely that's been posted, figured that I would mention it here 16:01:32 #info communishift will be down from 2020-04-10 to 2020-05-01 for the datacenter move 16:01:32 ty for the heads up 16:02:22 ok, thank you Tim, and thanks everyone else for coming. Let's make our work more open :) 16:02:27 #endmeeting