16:00:12 <jcajka> #startmeeting Go SIG meeting
16:00:12 <zodbot> Meeting started Tue Aug  6 16:00:12 2019 UTC.
16:00:12 <zodbot> This meeting is logged and archived in a public location.
16:00:12 <zodbot> The chair is jcajka. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:12 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
16:00:12 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'go_sig_meeting'
16:00:17 <jcajka> #chair eclipseo
16:00:17 <zodbot> Current chairs: eclipseo jcajka
16:00:21 <eclipseo> .hello2
16:00:22 <zodbot> eclipseo: eclipseo 'Robert-André Mauchin' <zebob.m@gmail.com>
16:04:20 <jcajka> Let's wait a bit to see if other will be able to join
16:04:33 <jcajka> others...
16:05:07 <jcajka> But generally speaking there are not scheduled topics
16:05:23 <jcajka> not-> no
16:05:56 * jcajka needs coffee
16:06:28 <eclipseo> just grabbed one
16:06:52 <jcajka> :)
16:07:05 <eclipseo> no topic, but on my part I've been fixing FTBFS following the mnass rebuild
16:07:33 <eclipseo> There are a few remaining where I'm waiting for upstream
16:07:36 <jcajka> and Open floor
16:07:38 <jcajka> #topic Open Floor
16:08:10 <eclipseo> also need help for reviews needed for upgrading packages
16:08:15 <jcajka> eclipseo: cool, any big issues with stdlib?
16:11:29 <eclipseo> no issue
16:12:05 <eclipseo> haven't touched binary packages yet too, delve dep and so on are FTBFS
16:12:12 <jcajka> ok :), thanks a lot for the hard work on the rebuilds
16:13:54 <jcajka> FYI deparker, has commented that the next release(rebase) of delve will be ready for rc version of 1.13 and current state is kind of expected
16:14:21 <eclipseo> pretty nuce to test the beta before hand, we can raise bugs to upstream more easily
16:15:12 <jcajka> he is kind of upstream for the delve ;)
16:15:32 <eclipseo> oh ok i didn't know
16:17:01 <jcajka> for the record https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735071
16:20:26 <eclipseo> ok that's all from me
16:23:01 <jcajka> I guess that also from my side, maybe there just to mention that there has been pretty extensive discussion about Go generics proposal on upstream Go devel list/group golang-dev
16:23:45 <jcajka> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/golang-dev
16:23:55 <eclipseo> for Go 2.0?
16:24:39 <jcajka> AFAIK yes
16:26:37 <eclipseo> are they planning to keep backward compatibility?
16:28:59 <jcajka> with 2.0 not really, but they will incrementally roll out changes that are in to the 1.XX, some are already in for 1.13
16:29:30 <jcajka> source https://blog.golang.org/go2-here-we-come haven't seen yet anything official that is more recent
16:31:11 <eclipseo> ok
16:31:47 <jcajka> any more topics? :)
16:32:55 <jcajka> oh... missed https://blog.golang.org/go2-next-steps
16:33:22 <eclipseo> no more topic from me
16:33:53 <jcajka> ok
16:33:59 <jcajka> #endmeeting