#fedora-meeting-1: Go/No Go Continuation, Round Two, RC3, F17
Meeting started by rbergeron at 15:00:38 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- Who's up (rbergeron, 15:01:03)
- Test Results (rbergeron, 15:11:31)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_17_Beta_RC3_Install
(rbergeron,
15:11:37)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_17_Beta_RC3_Base
(rbergeron,
15:12:11)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_17_Beta_RC3_Desktop
(rbergeron,
15:12:22)
- AGREED: we are okay
with the level of test coverage as of now on RC3 (rbergeron,
15:16:31)
- Blockers (rbergeron, 15:16:41)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741594 (adamw, 15:18:19)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741594#c14
(Martix,
15:18:54)
- AGREED: 741594 does
not hit any of the criteria and the cited scenarios are not
significant enough to worry about delaying the beta (adamw,
15:29:18)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810226 (adamw, 15:31:12)
- http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/9198/
(adamw,
15:40:55)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810161 (adamw, 15:48:57)
- AGREED: 810161 is
rejected as a blocker because the impact is minor (it's essentially
a cosmetic bug, desktop is still usable), also it only hits one
specific virt configuration so it can at least be worked around.
accepted as NTH and will be commonbugs'ed if we ship with it
(adamw,
16:13:56)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810289 (adamw, 16:14:24)
- AGREED: #810289 is
rejected as a blocker on the basis that we've never actually checked
for low space on upgrade (and hence have implictly never considered
it a blocking issue). anaconda will just try to upgrade and explode.
so this isn't in fact a regression compared to earlier releases, and
we don't have a specific requirement for a low space check in
criteria or anywhere else. accepted as NTH (adamw,
16:31:38)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810136 (adamw, 16:31:59)
- AGREED: 810136 turns
out to be a dupe of 810005, moving discussion (adamw,
19:45:37)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810005 (adamw, 19:45:42)
- AGREED: 810005 is
accepted as a blocker per criterion "The installer must be able to
successfully complete an upgrade installation from a clean, fully
updated default installation (from any official install medium) of
the previous stable Fedora release, either via preupgrade or by
booting to the installer manually. The upgraded system must meet all
release criteria". the known workaround has too many limitations to
be considered 'good enough' (adamw,
19:53:23)
- Go or no-go? (rbergeron, 19:54:12)
- we have a blocker. (rbergeron,
19:54:27)
- qa votes no-go, ass do various others from
engineering, fesco, pm (rbergeron,
19:55:18)
- AGREED: we are no-go
on F17 Beta RC3 sadly (adamw,
19:58:27)
- ACTION: rbergeron to
update schedule.... again (rbergeron,
19:58:55)
- ACTION: rbergero to
send slip mail (rbergeron,
20:00:19)
- ACTION: tflink to do
blocker meeting mail following slip notice (rbergeron,
20:00:38)
- ACTION: qa heroes of
awesome to get some rest plz (rbergeron,
20:03:09)
- ACTION: adamw to get
a hole in one (rbergeron,
20:03:23)
- we will re-convene tomorrow or monday
(adamw,
20:08:56)
Meeting ended at 20:08:59 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- rbergeron to update schedule.... again
- rbergero to send slip mail
- tflink to do blocker meeting mail following slip notice
- qa heroes of awesome to get some rest plz
- adamw to get a hole in one
Action items, by person
- adamw
- adamw to get a hole in one
- rbergeron
- rbergeron to update schedule.... again
- tflink
- tflink to do blocker meeting mail following slip notice
- UNASSIGNED
- rbergero to send slip mail
- qa heroes of awesome to get some rest plz
People present (lines said)
- adamw (360)
- wwoods (99)
- rbergeron (91)
- tflink (56)
- bcl (54)
- nirik (49)
- Kevin_Kofler (37)
- ajax (32)
- Martix (19)
- rdieter_work (8)
- zodbot (6)
- cpuobsessed (5)
- pjones (5)
- ianweller (4)
- kalev (3)
- spot (3)
- satellit_laptop (1)
- pschindl_ (1)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.