#fedora-meeting-1: Fedora Packaging Committee

Meeting summary

1. Roll Call (spot, 17:02:57)
   
2. Change BR: maven to BR: maven-local - https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/251 (spot, 17:05:22)
   1. ACTION: Approved (+1:8, 0:0, -1:0) (spot, 17:10:50)
   
   
3. Drop Fedora Vendor tag from Desktop files in F19+ - https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/247 (spot, 17:11:30)
   1. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage (tibbs, 17:13:56)
   2. ACTION: spot's proposal approved (+1:8, 0:0, -1:0) (spot, 17:17:00)
   
   
4. NodeJS reopened - https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/246 (spot, 17:18:10)
   
5. Consider a ban on SysVinit scripts - https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/243 (spot, 17:24:05)
   1. ACTION: FPC has considered a ban and feels that the optional sysvinit subpackage guideline that exists is sufficient. (+1:5, 0:0, -1:0) (spot, 17:42:58)
   
   
6. Open Floor (spot, 17:44:11)
   
7. Simplify github guidelines - https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/252 (spot, 17:44:39)
   
8. Clarification request: Acceptable use of explicit Conflicts - https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/241 (spot, 17:47:49)
   1. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum#5._Make_sure_Fedora_is_upgraded is the closest thing to guidance we have, so if anyone wants to insert "turn on the updates repo", it would be appreciated. (spot, 17:59:36)
   2. ACTION: No Conflicts, use proper Provides/Obsoletes, and turn on updates repo when dist-upgrading (+1:8, 0:0, -1:0) (spot, 18:03:15)
   
   
9. Open Floor (spot, 18:04:11)
   1. ACTION: addendum to vendor tag item approved (+1:5, 0:0, -1:0) (spot, 18:08:33)

Action items

1. Approved (+1:8, 0:0, -1:0)
2. spot's proposal approved (+1:8, 0:0, -1:0)
3. FPC has considered a ban and feels that the optional sysvinit subpackage guideline that exists is sufficient. (+1:5, 0:0, -1:0)
4. No Conflicts, use proper Provides/Obsoletes, and turn on updates repo when dist-upgrading (+1:8, 0:0, -1:0)
5. addendum to vendor tag item approved (+1:5, 0:0, -1:0)

Action items, by person

1. spot
   1. spot's proposal approved (+1:8, 0:0, -1:0)
2. UNASSIGNED
   1. Approved (+1:8, 0:0, -1:0)
   2. FPC has considered a ban and feels that the optional sysvinit subpackage guideline that exists is sufficient. (+1:5, 0:0, -1:0)
   3. No Conflicts, use proper Provides/Obsoletes, and turn on updates repo when dist-upgrading (+1:8, 0:0, -1:0)
   4. addendum to vendor tag item approved (+1:5, 0:0, -1:0)

People present (lines said)

1. spot (102)
2. tibbs (54)
3. abadger1999 (38)
4. limburgher (36)
5. geppetto (32)
6. rdieter (20)
7. sochotni (17)
8. SmootherFrOgZ (10)
9. kalev (9)
10. racor (8)
11. zodbot (3)
12. mizdebsk (3)