=============================================
#fedora-meeting-1: Fedora Packaging Committee
=============================================


Meeting started by spot at 17:02:46 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2013-02-06/fpc.2013-02-06-17.02.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call  (spot, 17:02:57)

* Change BR: maven to BR: maven-local -
  https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/251  (spot, 17:05:22)
  * ACTION: Approved (+1:8, 0:0, -1:0)  (spot, 17:10:50)

* Drop Fedora Vendor tag from Desktop files in F19+ -
  https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/247  (spot, 17:11:30)
  * LINK:
    http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage
    (tibbs, 17:13:56)
  * ACTION: spot's proposal approved (+1:8, 0:0, -1:0)  (spot, 17:17:00)

* NodeJS reopened - https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/246  (spot,
  17:18:10)

* Consider a ban on SysVinit scripts -
  https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/243  (spot, 17:24:05)
  * ACTION: FPC has considered a ban and feels that the optional
    sysvinit subpackage guideline that exists is sufficient. (+1:5, 0:0,
    -1:0)  (spot, 17:42:58)

* Open Floor  (spot, 17:44:11)

* Simplify github guidelines - https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/252
  (spot, 17:44:39)

* Clarification request: Acceptable use of explicit Conflicts -
  https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/241  (spot, 17:47:49)
  * LINK:
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum#5._Make_sure_Fedora_is_upgraded
    is the closest thing to guidance we have, so if anyone wants to
    insert "turn on the updates repo", it would be appreciated.  (spot,
    17:59:36)
  * ACTION: No Conflicts, use proper Provides/Obsoletes, and turn on
    updates repo when dist-upgrading (+1:8, 0:0, -1:0)  (spot, 18:03:15)

* Open Floor  (spot, 18:04:11)
  * ACTION: addendum to vendor tag item approved (+1:5, 0:0, -1:0)
    (spot, 18:08:33)

Meeting ended at 18:09:06 UTC.




Action Items
------------
* Approved (+1:8, 0:0, -1:0)
* spot's proposal approved (+1:8, 0:0, -1:0)
* FPC has considered a ban and feels that the optional sysvinit
  subpackage guideline that exists is sufficient. (+1:5, 0:0, -1:0)
* No Conflicts, use proper Provides/Obsoletes, and turn on updates repo
  when dist-upgrading (+1:8, 0:0, -1:0)
* addendum to vendor tag item approved (+1:5, 0:0, -1:0)




Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* spot
  * spot's proposal approved (+1:8, 0:0, -1:0)
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * Approved (+1:8, 0:0, -1:0)
  * FPC has considered a ban and feels that the optional sysvinit
    subpackage guideline that exists is sufficient. (+1:5, 0:0, -1:0)
  * No Conflicts, use proper Provides/Obsoletes, and turn on updates
    repo when dist-upgrading (+1:8, 0:0, -1:0)
  * addendum to vendor tag item approved (+1:5, 0:0, -1:0)




People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* spot (102)
* tibbs (54)
* abadger1999 (38)
* limburgher (36)
* geppetto (32)
* rdieter (20)
* sochotni (17)
* SmootherFrOgZ (10)
* kalev (9)
* racor (8)
* zodbot (3)
* mizdebsk (3)




Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4

.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot