15:33:43 #startmeeting 15:33:43 Meeting started Mon Apr 7 15:33:43 2014 UTC. The chair is dgilmore. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:33:43 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:33:51 #meetingname releng 15:33:51 The meeting name has been set to 'releng' 15:34:19 #chair nirik sharkcz dwa masta tyll 15:34:19 Current chairs: dgilmore dwa masta nirik sharkcz tyll 15:34:28 #topic roll call 15:34:31 * masta is here 15:34:33 * sharkcz is here 15:34:41 * nirik is here 15:35:34 #topic Tickets: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/report/10 15:35:58 #topic ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5854 15:36:03 masta: any update? 15:36:20 regrettably I have no update from last week. 15:37:02 I actually still have that ticket open in my browser *from* last week, and just haven't knocked it out. 15:37:18 so I'll just do it =) 15:37:24 (ahoyhoy) 15:37:56 okay cheers 15:38:04 #action masta to knock out this ticket 15:38:16 #topic https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5362 15:38:21 * dgilmore has nothing to update 15:38:29 #action dgilmore to get it done 15:38:52 #topic ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5870 15:39:03 nirik: how did your discussions go? 15:39:09 so... 15:39:28 I talked with mitr, and he's got 0 time to work on sigul and thinks it could be hard to adjust it to automation. 15:39:46 I talked to threebean and he said fedmsg triggering signing should be fine if we wanted to. 15:40:06 Also, the stacks folks are looking at obs-signd for copr. 15:40:35 So... not sure where we go from here. We could also look at just doing obs-signd... 15:40:52 but copr and koji have pretty different setups actually. 15:41:17 Hi there 15:41:39 hi 15:41:53 ie, for koji sigul can write out to the koji store... but for copr there's no way to do that, it would need to send the rpm over and get a signed one back 15:41:57 Hi janeznemanic 15:42:02 * nirik waves 15:42:31 so, I guess we can ponder on it more and try and come up with some brilliant plan. ;) 15:42:47 nirik: we really should be using koji for stacks and not coprs 15:43:25 dgilmore: well, thats something to take up with them I guess. They wanted to make it easy to create a collection of coprs for a 'playground' thing. 15:43:39 #note mitr got 0 time to work on sigul and thinks it could be hard to adjust it to automation 15:43:42 I think we should only have one supported buildsystem for things Fedora officially ships 15:43:55 #note stacks folks are looking at obs-signd for copr 15:44:17 nirik: I will have to take it up with them I guess 15:44:35 #note all offical fedora builds should be done in koji 15:44:40 yeah, the playground stuff I think should be coming as a change... will get discussed more widely then 15:45:06 #action dgilmore to wirk with the stacks working group to bring them back to building in koji 15:45:34 nirik: guess it depends on what playground is and if its supported by fedora 15:45:48 or just somewhere for people to test things out and not really part of Fedora 15:45:49 yeah 15:48:23 anyway lets table for now. 15:48:33 #topic open floor 15:48:54 dgilmore: did you see threebean's mash patches? ;) 15:49:06 Just wanted to say that I got oz/imagefactory up and running in koji after we updated koji last week 15:49:09 nirik: I did not 15:49:29 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081622 (I think you already merged this one?) 15:49:46 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082830 (needs more discussion I think) 15:50:04 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082832 (might be ready to go) 15:51:07 nirik: the last one I really do not like. and the way we do composes we really need to update the multilib policy by doing a build 15:51:48 dgilmore: ok, bummer. I was hoping we could avoid builds when changing that, seems like a waste (but I'm probibly missing why 15:51:52 I am not the biggest fan of keeping old updates in the repo, but I get why it may be needed 15:52:18 I think a time limit could be a good compromise. 15:52:22 and help people a lot 15:53:25 we probably need to sit down and work out a list of features we want from releng tools 15:53:41 sure. I just thought these were low lying fruit... 15:54:49 do you know when you might do a new mash release? (with the drpms patch at least) 15:55:08 was going to work on appliance-tools and mash updates today 15:56:01 cool. If the old updates thing + time looks sane it would be cool to have that too... :) 15:56:01 dgilmore: then please apply the signing key fix from https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/buildsys/2014-March/004267.html 15:56:35 sharkcz: okay, thought it was already, I need to change that list 15:56:45 just have f20 and f21 keys in rawhide 15:57:12 dgilmore: you did larger part of the changes I sent some time ago, but skipped the key list in rawhide config 15:57:28 sharkcz: okay, that needs trimmed 15:57:32 ok 15:57:34 i was planning to do so today 15:57:43 no need to keep ancient keys there 15:57:53 yep, EFE550F5 is the correct f20 key 15:58:20 thanks 15:58:22 anyone else have anything to bring up? 15:58:24 another open floor item: locking in pungi -> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083287 15:58:59 threebean: ill review the patch 15:59:05 and try get it some testing 15:59:16 Id like to start trying to do f21compsoes 15:59:19 composes 15:59:31 cool - thanks :) 15:59:42 just to see what things will look like 16:00:39 threebean: I also filed a few things on releng dash... 16:00:54 that just came out of the qa meeting. Want to make it easier for people to get to rawhide. 16:01:48 * dgilmore has rawhide running on 7 machines here 16:02:08 nirik: sure. I'll take a look at the qa meeting notes 16:02:21 anyone have anything else? 16:02:41 threebean: I filed github issues for the 2 they came up with. ;) 16:02:56 thanks :) 16:04:11 will finish the meeting early if there is nothing else 16:05:40 #endmeeting